World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter N. Burns

Peter N. Burns

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
56
Citations
12819
World Ranking
2796
National Ranking
117

Peter N. Burns publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter N. Burns sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 163 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Peter N. Burns D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter N. Burns sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents

    Unknown

  • Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role?

    Unknown

  • American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography.

    Sharon L. Mulvagh;Harry Rakowski;Mani A. Vannan;Sahar S. Abdelmoneim

  • Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast.

    Unknown

  • Harmonic hepatic US with microbubble contrast agent: initial experience showing improved characterization of hemangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastasis.

    Unknown

  • SONOPORATION BY ULTRASOUND-ACTIVATED MICROBUBBLE CONTRAST AGENTS: EFFECT OF ACOUSTIC EXPOSURE PARAMETERS ON CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY AND CELL VIABILITY

    Unknown

  • How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS).

    Christoph F. Dietrich;Michalakis Averkiou;Michael Bachmann Nielsen;Richard G. Barr

  • Contrast echocardiography: Current and future applications

    Unknown

  • Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US.

    Unknown

  • Improved detection of hepatic metastases with pulse-inversion US during the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A: multicenter study.

    Unknown

  • Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography: Left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion

    Unknown

  • Enhancement Patterns of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Contrast-enhanced US: Comparison with Histologic Differentiation

    Unknown

  • Blood flow in deep abdominal and pelvic vessels: ultrasonic pulsed-Doppler analysis.

    Unknown

  • Artifacts in ultrasonic contrast agent studies.

    F. Forsberg;Ji-Bin Liu;P. N. Burns;D. A. Merton

  • Optimising phase and amplitude modulation schemes for imaging microbubble contrast agents at low acoustic power.

    Unknown

  • Focal hepatic masses: enhancement patterns with SH U 508A and pulse-inversion US.

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with US: Imaging, Doppler, and contrast agents

    Katherine W. Ferrara;Christopher R.B. Merritt;Peter N. Burns;F. Stuart Foster

  • Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature

    Unknown

  • High-frequency Doppler ultrasound monitors the effects of antivascular therapy on tumor blood flow.

    David E. Goertz;Joanne L. Yu;Robert S. Kerbel;Peter N. Burns

  • Dynamic Microbubble Contrast-enhanced US to Measure Tumor Response to Targeted Therapy: A Proposed Clinical Protocol with Results from Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Antiangiogenic Therapy

    Ross Williams;John M. Hudson;Brendan A. Lloyd;Ahthavan R. Sureshkumar

Frequent Co-Authors

F. Stuart Foster
F. Stuart Foster University of Toronto
Barry B. Goldberg
Barry B. Goldberg Thomas Jefferson University
Roberto M. Lang
Roberto M. Lang University of Chicago
Dalane W. Kitzman
Dalane W. Kitzman Wake Forest University
Samuel A. Wickline
Samuel A. Wickline University of South Florida
Itzhak Kronzon
Itzhak Kronzon Lenox Hill Hospital
John A. Rowlands
John A. Rowlands Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Katherine W. Ferrara
Katherine W. Ferrara Stanford University
Anne L. Martel
Anne L. Martel University of Toronto
Paul A. Dayton
Paul A. Dayton University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter N. Burns