World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Paul L. Heller publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Heller sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Paul L. Heller D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Heller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul L. Heller was affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States during their academic career. Their professional record indicates a focus on academic research, but specific areas of study, including main fields, subfields, and topics, have not been documented in available records.

The publication history of Paul L. Heller does not list any recent papers, nor is there detailed information about frequent publication venues or co-authors. Likewise, there are no recorded book publications attributed to them.

Available data do not document any awards received or notable distinctions during their career. Due to their deceased status, all information is presented in the past tense, respecting their legacy based on what is accessible.

Best Publications

  • The large-scale dynamics of grain-size variation in alluvial basins, 1: Theory

    Chris Paola;Paul L. Heller;Charles L. Angevine

  • Two-phase stratigraphic model of foreland-basin sequences

    Paul L. Heller;Charles L. Angevine;Nancy S. Winslow;Christopher Paola

  • Interpreting avulsion process from ancient alluvial sequences: Guadalope-Matarranya system (northern Spain) and Wasatch Formation (western Colorado)

    David Mohrig;Paul L. Heller;Chris Paola;William J. Lyons

  • Downstream Changes In Alluvial Architecture: An Exploration of Controls on Channel-stacking Patterns

    Paul L. Heller;Chris Paola

  • Quantitative Sedimentary Basin Modeling

    Charles L. Angevine;Paul L. Heller;Chris Paola

  • Plate tectonics and basin subsidence history

    Xiangyang Xie;Paul L. Heller

  • Submarine ramp facies model for delta-fed, sand-rich turbidite systems

    Paul L. Heller;William R. Dickinson

  • Fluvial response to abrupt global warming at the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary

    Brady Z. Foreman;Paul L. Heller;Mark T. Clementz

  • Time of initial thrusting in the Sevier orogenic belt, Idaho-Wyoming and Utah

    P. L. Heller;S. S. Bowdler;H. P. Chambers;J. C. Coogan

  • The relative contribution of accretion, shear, and extension to Cenozoic tectonic rotation in the Pacific Northwest

    Ray E. Wells;Paul L. Heller

  • History and causes of post-Laramide relief in the Rocky Mountain orogenic plateau

    Margaret E. McMillan;Paul L. Heller;Scott L. Wing

  • The large-scale dynamics of grain-size variation in alluvial basins, 2: Application to syntectonic conglomerate

    Paul L. Heller;Paul L. Heller;Chris Paola;Chris Paola

  • Significance of channel-belt clustering in alluvial basins

    Elizabeth A. Hajek;Elizabeth A. Hajek;Paul L. Heller;Benjamin A. Sheets

  • Postdepositional tilt of the Miocene-Pliocene Ogallala Group on the western Great Plains: Evidence of late Cenozoic uplift of the Rocky Mountains

    Margaret E. McMillan;Charles L. Angevine;Paul L. Heller

  • Time lag of syntectonic sedimentation across an alluvial basin: theory and example from the Ebro Basin, Spain

    Merren A. Jones;Paul L. Heller;Eduard Roca;Miguel Garcés

  • The paradox of Lower Cretaceous gravels and the initiation of thrusting in the Sevier orogenic belt, United States Western Interior

    Paul L. Heller;Chris Paola

  • Geomorphology and sequence stratigraphy due to slow and rapid base-level changes in an experimental subsiding basin (XES 96-1)

    Paul L. Heller;Chris Paola;In-Gul Hwang;Barbara John

  • Isotopic provenance of sandstones from the Eocene Tyee Formation, Oregon Coast Range

    Paul L. Heller;Zell E. Peterman;James R. O'neil;Muhammad Shafiqullah

  • Detrital modes of upper Paleozoic sandstones derived from Antler Orogen in Nevada; implications for nature of Antler Orogeny

    William R. Dickinson;Dwight W. Harbaugh;Arthur H. Saller;Paul L. Heller

  • Mesozoic Basin Development and Tectonic Evolution of the Dabieshan Orogenic Belt, Central China

    Shaofeng Liu;Shaofeng Liu;Paul L. Heller;Guowei Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Paola
Chris Paola University of Minnesota
David Mohrig
David Mohrig The University of Texas at Austin
James R. O'Neil
James R. O'Neil United States Geological Survey
William R. Dickinson
William R. Dickinson University of Arizona
Neil F. Humphrey
Neil F. Humphrey University of Wyoming
Ken Dueker
Ken Dueker University of Wyoming
Zell E. Peterman
Zell E. Peterman United States Geological Survey
Scott L. Wing
Scott L. Wing National Museum of Natural History
Scott B. Smithson
Scott B. Smithson University of Wyoming
Don L. Anderson
Don L. Anderson California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which can be further enhanced through related online degrees. For example, those interested in blending creativity with science might explore an online MFA visual arts program. This unique combination can lead to specialized roles in scientific visualization and environmental communication.

For professionals aiming to develop leadership skills within scientific organizations, pursuing the best online masters degree in human resource management programs can be invaluable. These programs provide essential knowledge for managing teams, which is crucial in large environmental firms and research institutions.

Senior learners exploring career shifts or continued education will find one year degrees for seniors especially accessible. Many of these streamlined programs offer flexible schedules tailored to diverse life stages while enhancing skills related to Earth Science.

Lastly, for those pursuing information management roles in libraries or archives related to earth and environmental data, programs from ALA accredited schools provide reputable training. These degrees ensure graduates are well-prepared to handle critical information resources supporting scientific research.

Best Scientists Citing Paul L. Heller

Recently Published Articles