World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
6484
World Ranking
9278
National Ranking
3916

Paul J. Shaw publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Shaw sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 74 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul J. Shaw D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Shaw sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul J. Shaw is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of neuroscience. Their work encompasses several subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, endocrine and autonomic systems, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, and cell biology.

The main topics of Paul J. Shaw's research include:

  • Neurobiology and insect physiology research
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Sleep and wakefulness research
  • Insect and arachnid ecology and behavior
  • Zebrafish biomedical research applications
  • Plant molecular biology research
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research

Recent papers authored by Paul J. Shaw illustrate a focus on sleep, circadian rhythms, and neurobiology, often using Drosophila as a model organism. Notable publications include:

  • "A Paradoxical Kind of Sleep in Drosophila melanogaster" (2020) published in Current Biology
  • "Sleep-promoting neurons remodel their response properties to calibrate sleep drive with environmental demands" (2022) published in PLoS Biology
  • "Experimentally induced active and quiet sleep engage non-overlapping transcriptional programs in Drosophila" (2023) published in eLife
  • "Disrupting flight increases sleep and identifies a novel sleep-promoting pathway in Drosophila" (2020) published in Science Advances
  • "Weekend Light Shifts Evoke Persistent Drosophila Circadian Neural Network Desynchrony" (2021) published in Journal of Neuroscience

Paul J. Shaw has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Bruno van Swinderen
  • Lucy A.L. Tainton-Heap
  • Eleni Notaras
  • Stephane Dissel
  • Melanie Ford

Their publications appear regularly in prominent scientific venues, particularly:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS Biology
  • eLife
  • Current Biology
  • Science Advances

Best Publications

  • Correlates of Sleep and Waking in Drosophila melanogaster

    Paul J. Shaw;Chiara Cirelli;Ralph J. Greenspan;Giulio Tononi

  • Stress response genes protect against lethal effects of sleep deprivation in Drosophila.

    Paul J. Shaw;Giulio Tononi;Giulio Tononi;Ralph J. Greenspan;Donald F. Robinson

  • INDUCING SLEEP BY REMOTE CONTROL FACILITATES MEMORY CONSOLIDATION IN DROSOPHILA

    J M Donlea;M Thimgan;Y Suzuki;L Gottschalk

  • Waking Experience Affects Sleep Need in Drosophila

    Indrani Ganguly-Fitzgerald;Jeff Donlea;Paul J. Shaw

  • Use-dependent plasticity in clock neurons regulates sleep need in Drosophila.

    Jeffrey M. Donlea;Narendrakumar Ramanan;Paul J. Shaw

  • D1 Receptor Activation in the Mushroom Bodies Rescues Sleep-Loss-Induced Learning Impairments in Drosophila

    Laurent Seugnet;Yasuko Suzuki;Lucy Vine;Laura Gottschalk

  • Essentials of sleep recordings in Drosophila: Moving beyond sleep time

    Rozi Andretic;Paul J. Shaw

  • Sleep Restores Behavioral Plasticity to Drosophila Mutants

    Stephane Dissel;Veena Angadi;Leonie Kirszenblat;Yasuko Suzuki

  • How deeply does your mutant sleep? Probing arousal to better understand sleep defects in Drosophila

    R. Faville;B. Kottler;G. J. Goodhill;P. J. Shaw

  • Oscillatory brain activity in spontaneous and induced sleep stages in flies

    Melvyn H. W. Yap;Martyna J. Grabowska;Chelsie Rohrscheib;Rhiannon Jeans

  • The Perilipin homologue, Lipid storage droplet 2, regulates sleep homeostasis and prevents learning impairments following sleep loss

    Matthew S. Thimgan;Yasuko Suzuki;Laurent Seugnet;Laura Gottschalk

  • Identification of a biomarker for sleep drive in flies and humans

    Laurent Seugnet;Jaime Boero;Laura Gottschalk;Stephen P. Duntley

  • Sleep and the fruit fly.

    Ralph J. Greenspan;Giulio Tononi;Chiara Cirelli;Paul J. Shaw

  • Sleep deprivation during early-adult development results in long-lasting learning deficits in adult Drosophila.

    Laurent Seugnet;Yasuko Suzuki;Jeff M. Donlea;Laura Gottschalk

  • Models of Insomnia

    Michael Perlis;Paul J. Shaw;Georgina Cano;Colin A. Espie

  • Notch Signaling Modulates Sleep Homeostasis and Learning after Sleep Deprivation in Drosophila

    Laurent Seugnet;Yasuko Suzuki;Gabriel Merlin;Laura Gottschalk

  • No evidence of brain cell degeneration after long-term sleep deprivation in rats.

    Chiara Cirelli;Paul J Shaw;Allan Rechtschaffen;Giulio Tononi

  • Identifying Sleep Regulatory Genes Using a Drosophila Model of Insomnia

    Laurent Seugnet;Yasuko Suzuki;Matthew S. Thimgan;Jeffrey Donlea

  • Perchance to dream: solving the mystery of sleep through genetic analysis.

    Paul J. Shaw;Paul Franken

  • Self-reported sleep quality in college students: a repeated measures approach.

    James Hawkins;Paul Shaw

  • foraging alters resilience/vulnerability to sleep disruption and starvation in Drosophila

    Jeffrey Donlea;Averi Leahy;Matthew S. Thimgan;Yasuko Suzuki

Frequent Co-Authors

Giulio Tononi
Giulio Tononi University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ralph J. Greenspan
Ralph J. Greenspan University of California, San Diego
Chiara Cirelli
Chiara Cirelli University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bruno van Swinderen
Bruno van Swinderen University of Queensland
Neal S. Silverman
Neal S. Silverman University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
James M. Krueger
James M. Krueger Washington State University Spokane
Thomas Preat
Thomas Preat PSL University
Nirinjini Naidoo
Nirinjini Naidoo University of Pennsylvania
George M. Church
George M. Church Harvard University
Ying-Hui Fu
Ying-Hui Fu University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens the door to many interdisciplinary career paths, especially in mental health and counseling. Many students pursue advanced or complementary degrees online for added flexibility. If you're interested in counseling, consider enrolling in one of the cacrep accredited counseling programs to ensure a rigorous, recognized education.

Cost is a major factor for prospective students. Exploring the cheapest online counseling degree options can help keep your education affordable while preparing you for meaningful work. Those seeking a specialty in family dynamics should look into earning an mft degree (Marriage and Family Therapy), another area closely aligned with neuroscience concepts.

If you’re drawn to research and clinical roles, a master's in psychology expands your opportunities. Learn more about how much does a masters in psychology cost to plan your career path effectively. Neuro-focused graduates are highly valued within counseling, therapy, and research roles, particularly as the need for advanced mental healthcare professionals continues to grow.

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Shaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles