World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
35
Citations
4478
World Ranking
2688
National Ranking
945

Paul G. Allison publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G. Allison sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 217 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Paul G. Allison D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G. Allison sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Microstructures and mechanical behavior of Inconel 625 fabricated by solid-state additive manufacturing

    O.G. Rivera;P.G. Allison;J.B. Jordon;O.L. Rodriguez

  • Microstructure-deformation relationship of additive friction stir-deposition Al–Mg–Si

    B.J. Phillips;D.Z. Avery;T. Liu;O.L. Rodriguez

  • Microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welding of 6061-to-7050 aluminum alloys

    R.I. Rodriguez;J.B. Jordon;P.G. Allison;T. Rushing

  • Influence of texture and grain refinement on the mechanical behavior of AA2219 fabricated by high shear solid state material deposition

    O.G. Rivera;P.G. Allison;L.N. Brewer;O.L. Rodriguez

  • Process-structure-property relations for as-deposited solid-state additively manufactured high-strength aluminum alloy

    C.J.T. Mason;R.I. Rodriguez;D.Z. Avery;B.J. Phillips

  • Influence of Grain Refinement and Microstructure on Fatigue Behavior for Solid-State Additively Manufactured Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy

    D. Z. Avery;B. J. Phillips;C. J. T. Mason;M. Palermo

  • A meshfree computational framework for the numerical simulation of the solid-state additive manufacturing process, additive friction stir-deposition (AFS-D)

    G.G. Stubblefield;K. Fraser;B.J. Phillips;J.B. Jordon

  • Elucidating the Effect of Additive Friction Stir Deposition on the Resulting Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Alloy WE43

    M. B. Williams;T. W. Robinson;C. J. Williamson;R. P. Kinser

  • Direct recycling of machine chips through a novel solid-state additive manufacturing process

    J.B. Jordon;P.G. Allison;B.J. Phillips;D.Z. Avery

  • Characterization of the fatigue behavior of additive friction stir-deposition AA2219

    K. Anderson-Wedge;D.Z. Avery;S.R. Daniewicz;J.W. Sowards

  • Effect of parallel deposition path and interface material flow on resulting microstructure and tensile behavior of Al-Mg-Si alloy fabricated by additive friction stir deposition

    B.J. Phillips;C.J.T. Mason;S.C. Beck;D.Z. Avery

  • Evaluation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy Repaired via Additive Friction Stir Deposition

    Unknown

  • Effect of thermomechanical processing on fatigue behavior in solid-state additive manufacturing of Al-Mg-Si alloy

    Unknown

  • Dynamic tensile behavior of electron beam additive manufactured Ti6Al4V

    Unknown

  • Use of nanoindentation phase characterization and homogenization to estimate the elastic modulus of heterogeneously decalcified cement pastes

    Unknown

  • Fatigue Behavior of Solid-State Additive Manufactured Inconel 625

    D. Z. Avery;O. G. Rivera;C. J. T. Mason;B. J. Phillips

  • Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of Additive Friction Stir-Deposition of Aluminum Alloy 5083 Effect of Lubrication on Material Anisotropy.

    Unknown

  • Mechanical properties and structure of the biological multilayered material system, Atractosteus spatula scales.

    P.G. Allison;M.Q. Chandler;R.I. Rodriguez;B.A. Williams

  • The effect of solutionizing and artificial aging on the microstructure and mechanical properties in solid-state additive manufacturing of precipitation hardened Al–Mg–Si alloy

    S.C. Beck;B.A. Rutherford;D.Z. Avery;B.J. Phillips

  • Capturing the effect of temperature, strain rate, and stress state on the plasticity and fracture of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) steel

    W.R. Whittington;A.L. Oppedal;S. Turnage;Y. Hammi

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark F. Horstemeyer
Mark F. Horstemeyer Liberty University
Haitham El Kadiri
Haitham El Kadiri Mississippi State University
Sean R. Agnew
Sean R. Agnew University of Virginia
Tirumalai S. Srivatsan
Tirumalai S. Srivatsan University of Akron
Robert F. Cook
Robert F. Cook National Institute of Standards and Technology
Arun M. Gokhale
Arun M. Gokhale Georgia Institute of Technology
Naresh Thadhani
Naresh Thadhani Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which can be enhanced through related online degree programs. For example, understanding the financial aspects of education is crucial, as seen in the comprehensive overview of online speech pathology degree programs cost, which helps prospective students budget for their studies effectively.

Veterans interested in advancing their education alongside their engineering skills can find tailored options. Many institutions offer online speech pathology degree programs for veterans, providing flexible scheduling and support tailored to military backgrounds, which can similarly benefit those transitioning into engineering fields.

For students eager to accelerate their academic journey, it’s worth examining expedited options. Programs like the 5-year accelerated speech pathology programs demonstrate how focused coursework and online flexibility can shorten degree completion time, a model increasingly adopted in engineering disciplines.

Additionally, specialized career paths such as forensic engineering or security-related roles may align with interests in behavioral sciences. Insights from fields like the FBI behavioral analysis unit reveal how multidisciplinary knowledge can expand career possibilities beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Paul G. Allison

Recently Published Articles