World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul Casaer

Paul Casaer

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
6541
World Ranking
7225
National Ranking
86

Paul Casaer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Casaer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 243 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul Casaer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Casaer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Casaer was affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium during their academic career. Their work is documented in the field of neuroscience and developmental brain studies, with a focus on topics that align with pediatric neurology.

Casaer's publication record includes at least one paper titled "Obituary" published in 2020 in the journal Brain and Development. This publication is the sole recorded contribution and aligns with the primary venue in which the scientist published.

  • Brain and Development

The scientist did not have recorded frequent co-authors or a broader network of collaborators in the available data, nor were there book publications or award recognitions documented.

Their research topics, main fields, and subfields of study are unspecified in the data provided, leaving the primary focus identifiable only through their published paper and affiliated journal.

Paul Casaer is documented as deceased, and the profile reflects their academic contributions in the past tense.

Best Publications

  • De novo mutations in ATP1A3 cause alternating hemiplegia of childhood

    Erin L Heinzen;Kathryn J Swoboda;Yuki Hitomi;Fiorella Gurrieri

  • Familial psychomotor retardation with markedly fluctuating serum prolactin, FSH and GH levels, partial TBG-deficiency, increased serum arylsulphatase A and increased CSF protein: a new syndrome?: 90

    J Jaeken;M Vanderschueren-Lodeweyckx;P Casaer;L Snoeck

  • Use of Tissue Oxygenation Index and Fractional Tissue Oxygen Extraction as Non-Invasive Parameters for Cerebral Oxygenation

    Gunnar Naulaers;Bart Meyns;Marc Miserez;Veerle Leunens

  • The value of fast MR imaging as an adjunct to ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis

    L. Breysem;H. Bosmans;S. Dymarkowski;D. Van Schoubroeck

  • Evidence of a non-progressive course of alternating hemiplegia of childhood: study of a large cohort of children and adults

    Eleni Panagiotakaki;Giuseppe Gobbi;Brian Neville;Friedrich Ebinger

  • Expanded motor and psychiatric phenotype in autosomal dominant Segawa syndrome due to GTP cyclohydrolase deficiency

    J L K Van Hove;Jean Steyaert;Gert Matthijs;Eric Legius

  • Vigabatrin in GABA metabolism disorders.

    Jaak Jaeken;Paul Casaer;Paul De Cock;Baudouin Francois

  • Cerebral tissue oxygenation index in very premature infants.

    G Naulaers;G Morren;S Van Huffel;P Casaer

  • Tethered Cord Syndrome in Occult Spinal Dysraphism. Timing and Outcome of Surgical Release

    L. Cornette;C. Verpoorten;L. Lagae;F. Van Calenbergh

  • Gamma-aminobutyric Acid Transaminase Deficiency - a Newly Recognized Inborn Error of Neurotransmitter Metabolism

    J Jaeken;P Casaer;P de Cock;L Corbeel

  • Effects of long-chain PUFA supplementation in infant formula on cognitive function in later childhood

    Peter Willatts;Stewart Forsyth;Carlo Agostoni;P. Casaer

  • Rett syndrome in females with CTS hot spot deletions : A disorder profile

    Eric Smeets;P Terhal;Paul Casaer;A Peters

  • Successful use of intravenous immunoglobulins in Landau-Kleffner syndrome

    Lieven G. Lagae;Jon Silberstein;Phillippe L. Gillis;Paul J. Casaer

  • FLUNARIZINE IN ALTERNATING HEMIPLEGIA IN CHILDHOOD

    Paul Casaer;Myriam Azou

  • Continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep: a 30 months follow-up study of neuropsychological recovery and EEG findings

    Marc Boel;Paul Casaer

  • Flunarizine in alternating hemiplegia in childhood. An international study in 12 children

    Paul Casaer

  • CT and MR in infants with pericerebral collections and macrocephaly: benign enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces versus subdural collections.

    G Wilms;G Vanderschueren;P H Demaerel;M H Smet

  • Closed spinal dysraphism: A review on diagnosis and treatment in infancy

    Luc Cornette;Carla Verpoorten;Lieven Lagae;Chris Plets

  • Prognostic value of early somatosensory evoked potentials for adverse outcome in full-term infants with birth asphyxia.

    Linda S De Vries;Linda S De Vries;Véronique Pierrat;Paula Eken;Taketsugu Minami

  • Add-on therapy of fenfluramine in intractable self-induced epilepsy.

    Marc Boel;Paul Casaer

  • Neurofibromatosis type 1 in childhood: correlation of MRI findings with intelligence.

    Eric Legius;Mie-Jef Descheemaeker;Jean Steyaert;A Spaepen

Frequent Co-Authors

Lieven Lagae
Lieven Lagae KU Leuven
Jaak Jaeken
Jaak Jaeken KU Leuven
Guy Marchal
Guy Marchal KU Leuven
Herman Kingma
Herman Kingma Maastricht University Medical Centre
Eric Legius
Eric Legius KU Leuven
Victor Dubowitz
Victor Dubowitz Imperial College London
Johan S.H. Vles
Johan S.H. Vles Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Neuroscience opens doors to a variety of interconnected fields and online degree pathways. For students interested in brain health, mental well-being, or therapy, pursuing an online counseling degree is a popular choice. There are many counseling bachelor's degree online programs that provide foundational knowledge and essential skills for entry-level roles.

Advanced learners may consider enrolling in cacrep accredited programs online to meet licensure requirements and ensure high-quality training. If your interests extend to family dynamics and therapy, there are several affordable online mft programs that specialize in marriage and family therapy, a sector closely aligned with neuroscience research.

For those looking to deepen their expertise in human behavior or psychological science, an affordable online master's in psychology may be ideal. These varied pathways allow you to tailor your studies toward your long-term career goals in neuroscience and related fields, all while enjoying the flexibility and accessibility of online education.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Casaer

Recently Published Articles