World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
4566
World Ranking
13581
National Ranking
359

Olivier Commowick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Commowick sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 124 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Olivier Commowick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Commowick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olivier Commowick was affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France. Their research primarily dealt with topics in Medicine, with a focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientific contributions of Olivier Commowick concentrated particularly on advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, multiple sclerosis research studies, advanced MRI techniques and applications, Mycobacterium research and diagnosis, fetal and pediatric neurological disorders, bone and joint diseases, and MRI in cancer diagnosis.

Frequent publication venues for their work included:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • PLoS ONE
  • 2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)

Among their recent papers were:

  • "Multiple sclerosis lesions segmentation from multiple experts: The MICCAI 2016 challenge dataset," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Artificial intelligence to predict clinical disability in patients with multiple sclerosis using FLAIR MRI," 2020, Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
  • "New OFSEP recommendations for MRI assessment of multiple sclerosis patients: Special consideration for gadolinium deposition and frequent acquisitions," 2020, Journal of Neuroradiology
  • "Unsupervised Domain Adaptation With Optimal Transport in Multi-Site Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions From MRI Data," 2020, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
  • "Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

They also contributed to a book published by Frontiers Media titled "Automatic methods for multiple sclerosis new lesions detection and segmentation" (2023).

Olivier Commowick collaborated frequently with researchers including François Cotton, Romain Casey, Frédéric Cervenansky, Michel Dojat, and Benoît Combès.

Best Publications

  • A log-euclidean framework for statistics on diffeomorphisms

    Vincent Arsigny;Olivier Commowick;Xavier Pennec;Nicholas Ayache

  • Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge

    K. Murphy;B. van Ginneken;J. M. Reinhardt;S. Kabus

  • Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: Resource and challenge.

    Aaron Carass;Snehashis Roy;Amod Jog;Jennifer L. Cuzzocreo

  • Objective Evaluation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation using a Data Management and Processing Infrastructure

    Olivier Commowick;Audrey Istace;Michaël Kain;Baptiste Laurent

  • The DTI Challenge: Toward Standardized Evaluation of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography for Neurosurgery

    Sonia Pujol;William Wells;Carlo Pierpaoli;Caroline Brun

  • Evaluation of an atlas-based automatic segmentation software for the delineation of brain organs at risk in a radiation therapy clinical context

    Aurélie Isambert;Frédéric Dhermain;François Bidault;Olivier Commowick

  • Atlas-based automatic segmentation of MR images: Validation study on the brainstem in radiotherapy context

    Pierre-Yves Bondiau;Grégoire Malandain;Stéphane Chanalet;Pierre-Yves Marcy

  • A Fast and Log-Euclidean Polyaffine Framework for Locally Linear Registration

    Vincent Arsigny;Olivier Commowick;Nicholas Ayache;Xavier Pennec

  • Atlas-based delineation of lymph node levels in head and neck computed tomography images.

    Olivier Commowick;Vincent Grégoire;Grégoire Malandain

  • Using Frankenstein's Creature Paradigm to Build a Patient Specific Atlas

    Olivier Commowick;Simon K. Warfield;Grégoire Malandain

  • A pre-clinical assessment of an atlas-based automatic segmentation tool for the head and neck

    Richard Sims;Richard Sims;Aurelie Isambert;Vincent Grégoire;François Bidault

  • An efficient locally affine framework for the smooth registration of anatomical structures

    Olivier Commowick;Vincent Arsigny;Aurélie Isambert;Jimena Costa

  • Estimating A Reference Standard Segmentation With Spatially Varying Performance Parameters: Local MAP STAPLE

    O. Commowick;A. Akhondi-Asl;S. K. Warfield

  • Multiple sclerosis lesions segmentation from multiple experts: The MICCAI 2016 challenge dataset

    Olivier Commowick;Michaël Kain;Romain Casey;Roxana Ameli

  • White matter abnormalities in depression: A categorical and phenotypic diffusion MRI study

    Julie Coloigner;Jean-Marie Batail;Olivier Commowick;Isabelle Corouge

  • Non-rigid Atlas to Subject Registration with Pathologies for Conformal Brain Radiotherapy

    Radu Stefanescu;Olivier Commowick;Grégoire Malandain;Pierre-Yves Bondiau

  • Block-matching strategies for rigid registration of multimodal medical images

    Olivier Commowick;Nicolas Wiest-Daessle;Sylvain Prima

  • Automated delineation of white matter fiber tracts with a multiple region-of-interest approach

    Ralph O. Suarez;Olivier Commowick;Sanjay P. Prabhu;Simon K. Warfield

  • Efficient selection of the most similar image in a database for critical structures segmentation

    Olivier Commowick;Grégoire Malandain

  • A log-euclidean polyaffine framework for locally rigid or affine registration

    Vincent Arsigny;Olivier Commowick;Xavier Pennec;Nicholas Ayache

  • MSSEG-2 challenge proceedings: Multiple sclerosis new lesions segmentation challenge using a data management and processing infrastructure

    Olivier Commowick;Frédéric Cervenansky;François Cotton;Michel Dojat

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Barillot
Christian Barillot Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires
Simon K. Warfield
Simon K. Warfield Boston Children's Hospital
Grégoire Malandain
Grégoire Malandain French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Nicholas Ayache
Nicholas Ayache French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Xavier Pennec
Xavier Pennec French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Jean-Philippe Ranjeva
Jean-Philippe Ranjeva Aix-Marseille University
Michel Dojat
Michel Dojat French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Tristan Glatard
Tristan Glatard Concordia University
Julien Cohen-Adad
Julien Cohen-Adad Polytechnique Montréal
Charles R.G. Guttmann
Charles R.G. Guttmann Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open many new doors for students interested in Computer Science and related fields. For those who may not have a high GPA, there are online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa, allowing a second chance to start or advance a career in tech.

If you’re motivated to accelerate your education, earning a 2-year computer science degree online delivers flexibility and can be a fast track to high-demand roles like software developer, systems analyst, or IT specialist.

Interested in making a difference in the environment? Computer Science skills also pair well with environmental science and engineering. You may be surprised by what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree, including sustainability analyst or environmental data scientist.

For an affordable path, consider accredited environmental engineering online degree programs, which blend technical skills with environmental impact. This versatility ensures your education in Computer Science can lead to a wide variety of rewarding and impactful career pathways, both in the tech sector and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier Commowick

Recently Published Articles