World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
3739
World Ranking
3058
National Ranking
87

M.S. Shunmugam publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.S. Shunmugam sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 152 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

M.S. Shunmugam D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.S. Shunmugam sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Multi-objective optimization of wire-electro discharge machining process by Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm

    Unknown

  • Mechanistic model for prediction of cutting forces in micro end-milling and experimental comparison

    Unknown

  • Selection of optimal conditions in multi-pass face-milling using a genetic algorithm

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of circularity from coordinate and form data using computational geometric techniques

    Unknown

  • A study on the sealing performance of bolted flange joints with gaskets using finite element analysis

    Unknown

  • Surface modification in electrodischarge processing with a powder compact tool electrode

    Unknown

  • Hybrid feature recognition method for setup planning from STEP AP-203

    Unknown

  • Precipitation phenomena, thermal stability and grain growth kinetics in an ultra-fine grained Al 2014 alloy after annealing treatment

    A. Dhal;S.K. Panigrahi;M.S. Shunmugam

  • Evaluation of straightness and flatness error using computational geometric techniques

    Unknown

  • Insight into the microstructural evolution during cryo-severe plastic deformation and post-deformation annealing of aluminum and its alloys

    A. Dhal;S.K. Panigrahi;M.S. Shunmugam

  • New approach for evaluating form errors of engineering surfaces

    Unknown

  • An algorithm for form error evaluation — using the theory of discrete and linear Chebyshev approximation

    Unknown

  • Investigation into magnetorheological abrasive honing (MRAH)

    Unknown

  • Processing of 3D sheet metal components in STEP AP-203 format. Part I: feature recognition system

    Unknown

  • Data mining applied to wire-EDM process

    Unknown

  • Improvement of wear resistance by EDM with tungsten carbide P/M electrode

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of form data using computational geometric techniques—Part I: Circularity error

    Unknown

  • Criteria for Computer-Aided Form Evaluation

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of circularity and sphericity from coordinate measurement data

    Unknown

  • Geometrical aspects of double enveloping worm gear drive

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Sushanta Kumar Panigrahi
Sushanta Kumar Panigrahi Indian Institute of Technology Madras

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offer exciting career opportunities, related fields can broaden your skills and professional options. For example, an accelerated applied behavior analysis masters online program can complement engineering expertise by developing analytical and problem-solving skills in behavioral science, a growing interdisciplinary area.

If you're interested in communication aspects within technology and healthcare industries, exploring slp graduate programs can provide insight into Speech-Language Pathology fields. These programs demand specific admissions requirements but lead to impactful careers, often intersecting with engineering in assistive technologies and human-computer interaction design.

Relatedly, communication sciences and disorders programs offer pathways to understanding speech and hearing challenges, expanding scope for engineers working on biomedical devices or adaptive tools.

When considering these options, it's important to weigh the financial commitment. Detailed information on the speech pathology online program cost can help you evaluate the investment against your career goals. Combining engineering with these fields can lead to unique and rewarding career trajectories.

Best Scientists Citing M.S. Shunmugam

Recently Published Articles