World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
59
Citations
9855
World Ranking
2092
National Ranking
136

Michiel M Rutgers van der Loeff publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel M Rutgers van der Loeff sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 341 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Michiel M Rutgers van der Loeff D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel M Rutgers van der Loeff sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michiel M Rutgers van der Loeff is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with significant contributions to Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, and Geology.

The scientist's recent publications cover a variety of topics related to oceanographic and geochemical processes, including riverine and shelf-derived trace elements, particle-seawater interactions, and trace metal distribution in polar and marine environments. Notable recent papers include:

  • The Transpolar Drift as a Source of Riverine and Shelf-Derived Trace Elements to the Central Arctic Ocean (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans)
  • Particle-Seawater Interaction of Neodymium in the North Atlantic (2020, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry)
  • Mercury Export Flux in the Arctic Ocean Estimated from 234Th/238U Disequilibria (2020, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry)
  • Dissolved Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Zn in the Arctic Ocean (2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans)
  • Separating individual contributions of major Siberian rivers in the Transpolar Drift of the Arctic Ocean (2021, Scientific Reports)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Michiel M Rutgers van der Loeff include:

  • Dorothea Bauch
  • Ronja Paffrath
  • Walter Geibert
  • Loes J. A. Gerringa
  • Ole Valk

Michiel M Rutgers van der Loeff publishes regularly in several scientific journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • Scientific Reports
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Nature Communications

Their main research topics include:

  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Radioactive contamination and transfer
  • Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research

Best Publications

  • An assessment of the use of sediment traps for estimating upper ocean particle fluxes

    Ken O. Buesseler;Avan N. Antia;Min Chen;Scott W. Fowler

  • 230Th-normalization: an essential tool for interpreting sedimentary fluxes during the late Quaternary

    Roger Francois;Martin Frank;Michiel M. Rutgers van der Loeff;Michael P. Bacon

  • The GEOTRACES Intermediate Data Product 2017

    Reiner Schlitzer;Robert F. Anderson;Elena Masferrer Dodas;Maeve Lohan

  • GEOTRACES – An international study of the global marine biogeochemical cycles of trace elements and their isotopes

    G.M. Henderson;R.F. Anderson;J. Adkins;P. Andersson

  • Sampling and Sample-handling Protocols for GEOTRACES Cruises

    G. Cutter;P. Andersson;Lou Codispoti;P. Croot

  • Trapping efficiency of bottom-tethered sediment traps estimated from the intercepted fluxes of 230Th and 231Pa

    Ein-Fen Yu;R. Francois;M. P. Bacon;S. Honjo

  • Comparison of summer and winter inorganic carbon, oxygen and nutrient concentrations in Antarctic sea ice brine

    Markus Gleitz;Michiel Rutgers v.d. Loeff;David N. Thomas;Gerhard S. Dieckmann

  • Similar glacial and interglacial export bioproductivity in the Atlantic Sector of the Southern Ocean: Multiproxy evidence and implications for glacial atmospheric CO2

    Martin Frank;Rainer Gersonde;Michiel Rutgers van der Loeff;Gerhard Bohrmann

  • Oxygen uptake kinetics in the benthic boundary layer

    Per O. J. Hall;Leif G. Anderson;Michiel M. Rutgers van der Loeff;Bjørn Sundby

  • Benthic fluxes of cadmium, copper, nickel, zinc and lead in the coastal environment

    Stig F.G. Westerlund;Leif G. Anderson;Per O.J. Hall;Åke Iverfeldt

  • Trapping efficiencies of sediment traps from the deep Eastern North Atlantic:: the 230Th calibration

    Jan Scholten;Jan Fietzke;S. Vogler;M. Rutgers van der Loeff

  • Ecology and biogeochemistry of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current during austral spring a summary of Southern Ocean JGOFS cruise ANT X/6 of R. V. Polarstern

    V. Smetacek;de Henricus Baar;U. Bathmann;K. Lochte

  • Low dissolved Fe and the absence of diatom blooms in remote Pacific waters of the Southern Ocean

    Hein J.W. de Baar;Jeroen T.M. de Jong;Rob F. Nolting;Klaas R. Timmermans

  • Scavenging of 230Th and 231Pa near the antarctic polar front in the South Atlantic

    Michiel M. Rutgers van der Loeff;Gijs W. Berger

  • Carbon export during the spring bloom at the Antarctic Polar Front, determined with the natural tracer 234Th

    Michiel M. Rutgers Van Der Loeff;Jana Friedrich;Ulrich V. Bathmann

  • The asphyxiation technique: An approach to distinguishing between molecular diffusion and biologically mediated transport at the sediment—water interface

    Michiel M. Rutgers van der Loeff;Leif G. Anderson;Per O. J. Hall;Åke Iverfeldt

  • A two-tracer (210Po-234Th) approach to distinguish organic carbon and biogenic silica export flux in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current

    Jana Friedrich;Michiel M. Rutgers van der Loeff

  • Provenance and transport of terrigenous sediment in the south Atlantic Ocean and their relations to glacial and interglacial cycles: Nd and Sr isotopic evidence

    H.J Walter;E Hegner;B Diekmann;G Kuhn

  • An intercomparison of small- and large-volume techniques for thorium-234 in seawater

    Ken O. Buesseler;Claudia Benitez-Nelson;Michiel Rutgers van der Loeff;John Andrews

  • The Transpolar Drift as a Source of Riverine and Shelf-Derived Trace Elements to the Central Arctic Ocean

    Matthew A. Charette;Lauren E. Kipp;Lauren E. Kipp;Laramie T. Jensen;Jessica S. Dabrowski

  • Transportation of water, particulate and dissolved organic and inorganic matter between a salt marsh and the Ems-Dollard estuary, The Netherlands

    Norbert Dankers;Michel Binsbergen;Koos Zegers;Remi Laane

  • The GEOTRACES Intermediate Data Product 2014

    Edward Mawji;Reiner Schlitzer;Elena Masferrer Dodas;Cyril Abadie

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich Bathmann
Ulrich Bathmann Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Hein J W de Baar
Hein J W de Baar University of Groningen
Astrid Bracher
Astrid Bracher University of Bremen
Pere Masqué
Pere Masqué Edith Cowan University
Augusto Mangini
Augusto Mangini Heidelberg University
Dorothea Bauch
Dorothea Bauch GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Nicolas Cassar
Nicolas Cassar Duke University
Ken O. Buesseler
Ken O. Buesseler Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Benjamin Rabe
Benjamin Rabe Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Humberto E. González
Humberto E. González Austral University of Chile

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Earth Science, several related fields offer promising online degree options. Professionals looking to enhance their leadership skills and manage teams in environmental organizations might consider pursuing an accredited online masters degree in human resource management. This degree provides valuable knowledge in workforce management, essential for coordinating complex projects and diverse teams.

Online education also offers flexibility for a wide range of learners. Notably, there are tailored online degrees for seniors, allowing experienced professionals or retirees to continue their education in related fields at their own pace, which can be a great way to stay engaged and contribute expertise.

Library science intersects with Earth Science through the management of scientific data and research materials. For those interested, pursuing an online mlis degree ala accredited offers a pathway to specialize in information organization and accessibility, critical for supporting environmental research.

Before committing, it’s wise to assess the value of further study. Understanding whether is a masters in library science worth it can help you make an informed decision about your educational investment and career trajectory.

Best Scientists Citing Michiel M Rutgers van der Loeff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles