World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
13313
World Ranking
17868
National Ranking
7312

Michael S. Barker publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Barker sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 140 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Michael S. Barker D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Barker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael S. Barker is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within biology, focusing largely on genetics, molecular biology, and plant sciences. They have made contributions to fields including biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, and agricultural and biological sciences.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Among the subfields they specialize in are molecular biology, plant science, genetics, and ecology, with particular emphasis on the areas of ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

  • Molecular Biology
  • Plant Science
  • Genetics
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

The scientist's research topics cover key aspects of plant genomics and genetics including genomics and phylogenetic studies, chromosomal and genetic variations, and genetic diversity and population structure. Additional topics of focus include genetic mapping and diversity, plant tissue culture and regeneration, plant diversity and evolution, as well as plant disease resistance and genetics.

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Plant Diversity and Evolution
  • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics

The scientist has contributed articles to various scientific venues, prominently appearing in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 19 publications, followed by Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 10, alongside multiple publications in the American Journal of Botany, Applications in Plant Sciences, and Nature Plants.

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • American Journal of Botany
  • Applications in Plant Sciences
  • Nature Plants

Michael S. Barker frequently collaborates with several peers, including Michael T. W. McKibben, Katrina M. Dlugosch, Zheng Li, Paul D. Blischak, and Hannah E. Marx.

  • Michael T. W. McKibben
  • Katrina M. Dlugosch
  • Zheng Li
  • Paul D. Blischak
  • Hannah E. Marx

Selected recent publications include the following:

  • "Anthoceros genomes illuminate the origin of land plants and the unique biology of hornworts," 2020, Nature Plants
  • "Patterns and Processes of Diploidization in Land Plants," 2021, Annual Review of Plant Biology
  • "Dynamic genome evolution in a model fern," 2022, Nature Plants
  • "Analysis of the Coptis chinensis genome reveals the diversification of protoberberine-type alkaloids," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Underwater CAM photosynthesis elucidated by Isoetes genome," 2021, Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns

    Eric Schuettpelz;Harald Schneider;Alan R. Smith;Peter Hovenkamp

  • The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants

    Troy E. Wood;Naoki Takebayashi;Michael S. Barker;Michael S. Barker;Itay Mayrose

  • Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants

    Norman J. Wickett;Siavash Mirarab;Nam Nguyen;Tandy Warnow

  • The Selaginella genome identifies genetic changes associated with the evolution of vascular plants.

    Jo Ann Banks;Tomoaki Nishiyama;Mitsuyasu Hasebe;Mitsuyasu Hasebe;John L. Bowman;John L. Bowman

  • Data access for the 1,000 Plants (1KP) project.

    Naim Matasci;Ling Hong Hung;Zhixiang Yan;Eric J. Carpenter

  • The butterfly plant arms-race escalated by gene and genome duplications.

    Patrick P. Edger;Patrick P. Edger;Patrick P. Edger;Hanna M. Heidel-Fischer;Michaël Bekaert;Jadranka Rota

  • Recently Formed Polyploid Plants Diversify at Lower Rates

    Itay Mayrose;Shing H. Zhan;Carl J. Rothfels;Karen Magnuson-Ford

  • Fern genomes elucidate land plant evolution and cyanobacterial symbioses

    Fay Wei Li;Fay Wei Li;Paul Brouwer;Lorenzo Carretero-Paulet;Shifeng Cheng

  • On the relative abundance of autopolyploids and allopolyploids.

    Michael S. Barker;Nils Arrigo;Nils Arrigo;Anthony E. Baniaga;Zheng Li

  • Multiple Paleopolyploidizations during the Evolution of the Compositae Reveal Parallel Patterns of Duplicate Gene Retention after Millions of Years

    Michael S. Barker;Nolan C. Kane;Nolan C. Kane;Marta Matvienko;Alexander Kozik

  • Anthoceros genomes illuminate the origin of land plants and the unique biology of hornworts

    Fay Wei Li;Tomoaki Nishiyama;Manuel Waller;Eftychios Frangedakis

  • Impact of whole-genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms.

    Jacob B. Landis;Douglas E. Soltis;Zheng Li;Hannah E. Marx

  • Early genome duplications in conifers and other seed plants.

    Zheng Li;Anthony E. Baniaga;Emily B. Sessa;Moira Scascitelli

  • Rarely successful polyploids and their legacy in plant genomes.

    Nils Arrigo;Michael S Barker

  • Paleopolyploidy in the Brassicales: Analyses of the Cleome Transcriptome Elucidate the History of Genome Duplications in Arabidopsis and Other Brassicales

    Michael S. Barker;Heiko Vogel;M. Eric Schranz

  • Probabilistic models of chromosome number evolution and the inference of polyploidy

    Itay Mayrose;Michael S. Barker;Michael S. Barker;Sarah P. Otto

  • Multiple large-scale gene and genome duplications during the evolution of hexapods

    Zheng Li;George P. Tiley;George P. Tiley;Sally R. Galuska;Chris R. Reardon

  • Access to RNA-sequencing data from 1,173 plant species: The 1000 Plant transcriptomes initiative (1KP)

    Eric J Carpenter;Naim Matasci;Saravanaraj Ayyampalayam;Shuangxiu Wu

  • Polyploid plants have faster rates of multivariate niche differentiation than their diploid relatives

    Anthony E. Baniaga;Hannah E. Marx;Hannah E. Marx;Nils Arrigo;Nils Arrigo;Michael S. Barker

  • COMPARATIVE GENOMIC AND POPULATION GENETIC ANALYSES INDICATE HIGHLY POROUS GENOMES AND HIGH LEVELS OF GENE FLOW BETWEEN DIVERGENT HELIANTHUS SPECIES

    Nolan C. Kane;Nolan C. Kane;Matthew G. King;Michael S. Barker;Michael S. Barker;Andrew Raduski

Frequent Co-Authors

Loren H. Rieseberg
Loren H. Rieseberg University of British Columbia
J. Chris Pires
J. Chris Pires Colorado State University
Paul G. Wolf
Paul G. Wolf University of Alabama in Huntsville
Nolan C. Kane
Nolan C. Kane University of Colorado Boulder
Fay-Wei Li
Fay-Wei Li Cornell University
Claude W. dePamphilis
Claude W. dePamphilis Pennsylvania State University
Patrick P. Edger
Patrick P. Edger Michigan State University
Gane Ka-Shu Wong
Gane Ka-Shu Wong University of Alberta
Douglas E. Soltis
Douglas E. Soltis University of Florida
Sean W. Graham
Sean W. Graham University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael S. Barker

Trending Scientists