World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
14744
World Ranking
2766
National Ranking
955

Michael B. Prime publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael B. Prime sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 139 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Michael B. Prime D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael B. Prime sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Best Publications

  • Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review

    Scott W. Doebling;Charles R. Farrar;Michael B. Prime;D.W. Shevitz

  • A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods

    S. W. Doebling;C. R. Farrar;M. B. Prime

  • Cross-sectional mapping of residual stresses by measuring the surface contour after a cut

    Unknown

  • Residual Stress Measurement by Successive Extension of a Slot: The Crack Compliance Method

    Unknown

  • Residual stress, stress relief, and inhomogeneity in aluminum plate

    Unknown

  • Residual stress measurements in a thick, dissimilar aluminum alloy friction stir weld

    Unknown

  • Residual stresses in LENS® components using neutron diffraction and contour method

    Unknown

  • Use of Inverse Solutions for Residual Stress Measurements

    Unknown

  • Microstructure, texture and residual stress in a friction-stir-processed AZ31B magnesium alloy

    W. Woo;W. Woo;H. Choo;H. Choo;M.B. Prime;Z. Feng

  • Laser surface-contouring and spline data-smoothing for residual stress measurement

    Unknown

  • Measuring Multiple Residual-Stress Components using the Contour Method and Multiple Cuts

    Unknown

  • The Contour Method

    Unknown

  • Uncertainty, Model Error, and Order Selection for Series-Expanded, Residual-Stress Inverse Solutions

    Unknown

  • Laser surface-contouring and spline data-smoothing for residual stress measurement

    Unknown

  • Measuring Inaccessible Residual Stresses Using Multiple Methods and Superposition

    P. Pagliaro;M. B. Prime;J.S. Robinson;B. Clausen

  • The measurement of residual stress in railway rails by diffraction and other methods

    J Kelleher;M B Prime;D Buttle;Paul Mummery

  • Structural Health Monitoring Studies of the Alamosa Canyon and I-40 Bridges

    Charles R. Farrar;Phillip J. Cornwell;Scott W. Doebling;Michael B. Prime

  • Measurement of Near Surface Residual Stresses Using Electric Discharge Wire Machining

    Unknown

  • The Contour Method Cutting Assumption: Error Minimization and Correction

    Unknown

  • Encyclopedia of Iron, Steel, and Their Alloys

    Rafael Colás;George E. Totten;Eduardo Altschuler;Helen Atkinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Bjørn Clausen
Bjørn Clausen Los Alamos National Laboratory
Donald W. Brown
Donald W. Brown Los Alamos National Laboratory
George T. Gray
George T. Gray Los Alamos National Laboratory
Charles R. Farrar
Charles R. Farrar Los Alamos National Laboratory
Hahn Choo
Hahn Choo University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Thomas A. Wynn
Thomas A. Wynn Pfizer (United States)
Bruce Remington
Bruce Remington Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Philip J. Withers
Philip J. Withers University of Manchester
Mark R. Daymond
Mark R. Daymond Queen's University
Irene J. Beyerlein
Irene J. Beyerlein University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways alongside Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For example, programs like online speech pathology degree costs and fees highlight the financial considerations students face when choosing their next academic step.

Veterans specifically may find tailored options beneficial. The availability of online speech pathology degrees for veterans showcases how education providers accommodate unique needs, offering flexible paths to career advancement.

For those looking to expedite their studies, resources such as the fast track speech pathology programs provide options to graduate in less time without compromising quality, a consideration also relevant for engineering students eager to enter the workforce.

Understanding salary expectations and job outlook is crucial. While not engineering-specific, insights like the FBI criminal profiler salary article illustrate the importance of researching career viability and earnings potential in any field.

Best Scientists Citing Michael B. Prime