World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
8372
World Ranking
8249
National Ranking
3538

Michael B. Miller publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael B. Miller sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 83 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael B. Miller D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael B. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael B. Miller is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research contributions span several key fields including Neuroscience and Medicine, with specific focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Social Psychology, Molecular Biology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their work addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Memory Processes and Influences

Michael B. Miller has published research in multiple respected venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • NeuroImage
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Recent papers by Miller showcase work across different aspects of cognitive neuroscience and physiological studies. Notable publications include:

  • "Functional reorganization of brain networks across the human menstrual cycle," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Habituation of the stress response multiplex to repeated cold pressor exposure," 2023, Frontiers in Physiology
  • "Who gives a criterion shift? A uniquely individualistic cognitive trait," 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • "Towards optimized methodological parameters for maximizing the behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation," 2024, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "Widespread frontoparietal fMRI activity is greatly affected by changes in criterion placement, not discriminability, during recognition memory and visual detection tests," 2023, NeuroImage

Their collaborative network includes frequent coauthors such as Tyler Santander, Barry Giesbrecht, Scott T. Grafton, Jessica M. Simonson, and Evan Layher, reflecting a diverse multidisciplinary approach with coauthor counts ranging from four to twelve joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Controllability of structural brain networks.

    Shi Gu;Fabio Pasqualetti;Matthew Cieslak;Qawi K. Telesford

  • How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Craig M. Bennett;Michael B. Miller

  • Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain

    Ann M. Hermundstad;Danielle S. Bassett;Kevin S. Brown;Kevin S. Brown;Elissa M. Aminoff

  • Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: an argument for multiple comparisons correction

    Craig M. Bennett;Michael B. Miller;George L. Wolford

  • The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging

    Craig M. Bennett;George L. Wolford;Michael B. Miller

  • Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies

    Benjamin O. Turner;Erick J. Paul;Michael B. Miller;Aron K. Barbey

  • The Left Hemisphere's Role in Hypothesis Formation

    George Wolford;Michael B. Miller;Michael Gazzaniga

  • Theoretical commentary: The role of criterion shift in false memory.

    Michael B. Miller;George L. Wolford

  • Functional reorganization of brain networks across the human menstrual cycle.

    Laura Pritschet;Tyler Santander;Caitlin M. Taylor;Evan Layher

  • Extensive Individual Differences in Brain Activations Associated with Episodic Retrieval are Reliable Over Time

    Michael B. Miller;John Darrell Van Horn;George L. Wolford;Todd C. Handy

  • Creating false memories for visual scenes.

    Michael B. Miller;Michael S. Gazzaniga

  • Detection of functional brain network reconfiguration during task-driven cognitive states.

    Qawi K. Telesford;Mary-Ellen Lynall;Jean M. Vettel;Michael B. Miller

  • Theory of mind broad and narrow: Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not

    Elsa Ermer;Scott A. Guerin;Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • Individual differences in cognitive style and strategy predict similarities in the patterns of brain activity between individuals.

    Michael B. Miller;Christa-Lynn Donovan;Craig M. Bennett;Elissa M. Aminoff

  • Neural Correlates of Detecting Pretense: Automatic Engagement of the Intentional Stance under Covert Conditions

    Tim P. German;Jeffrey L. Niehaus;Meghan P. Roarty;Barry Giesbrecht

  • Brain Network Adaptability across Task States

    Elizabeth N. Davison;Elizabeth N. Davison;Kimberly J. Schlesinger;Danielle S. Bassett;Mary-Ellen Lynall

  • fMRI reliability: influences of task and experimental design.

    Craig M. Bennett;Michael B. Miller

  • Modulation of neural activity by angle of rotation during imagined spatial transformations

    Madeleine Keehner;Scott A. Guerin;Michael B. Miller;David J. Turk

  • Individual Variability in Brain Activity: A Nuisance or an Opportunity?

    John Darrell Van Horn;Scott T. Grafton;Michael B. Miller

  • Searching for Patterns in Random Sequences

    George Wolford;Sarah E. Newman;Michael B. Miller;Gagan S. Wig

  • Structurally-constrained relationships between cognitive states in the human brain.

    Ann M. Hermundstad;Kevin S. Brown;Danielle S. Bassett;Elissa M. Aminoff

  • The year in cognitive neuroscience

    Alan Kingstone;Michael B. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott T. Grafton
Scott T. Grafton University of California, Santa Barbara
Michael S. Gazzaniga
Michael S. Gazzaniga University of California, Santa Barbara
George L. Wolford
George L. Wolford Dartmouth College
Alan Kingstone
Alan Kingstone University of British Columbia
Danielle S. Bassett
Danielle S. Bassett University of Pennsylvania
Jean M. Vettel
Jean M. Vettel United States Army Research Laboratory
John D. Van Horn
John D. Van Horn University of Virginia
Todd C. Handy
Todd C. Handy University of British Columbia
Aron K. Barbey
Aron K. Barbey University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
George J. Pappas
George J. Pappas University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens the door to diverse career opportunities, especially when combined with related fields through online study. For those passionate about clinical practice, there are flexible online accredited psyd programs that allow students to earn a doctorate in psychology, preparing them for high-level therapeutic roles.

If you’re interested in relationships and behavioral therapy, consider the many online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy), which can be completed quickly and provide entry into in-demand counseling careers.

Those seeking to join the workforce sooner may benefit from accelerated bachelors options, allowing for a faster completion time without compromising quality. These are ideal for driven students eager to start their careers.

Finally, for long-term value, it’s important to consider programs identified as the most valuable degree in the world. Combining neuroscience with these high-value degrees can open pathways to some of the most rewarding and lucrative positions in healthcare, research, and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Michael B. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles