World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
68
Citations
50108
World Ranking
2380
National Ranking
1071

Mark S. Boguski publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Boguski sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 105 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Mark S. Boguski D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Boguski sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Mark S. Boguski was affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the scientific community primarily through research activities conducted within this institution.

Mark S. Boguski was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2001. This designation reflects their involvement in the medical and health sciences research domain.

As no specific details about their research fields, subfields, main topics, publication venues, frequent co-authors, or individual papers were provided, this profile focuses on the verified information regarding their affiliation and award.

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain

    Ed S. Lein;Michael J. Hawrylycz;Nancy Ao;Mikael Ayres

  • Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21

    Kenneth W. Kinzler;Mef C. Nilbert;Li Kuo Su;Bert Vogelstein

  • Sequence diversity in CYP3A promoters and characterization of the genetic basis of polymorphic CYP3A5 expression.

    Peter Kuehl;Jiong Zhang;Yvonne Lin;Jatinder Lamba

  • The transcriptional program in the response of human fibroblasts to serum.

    Vishwanath R. Iyer;Michael B. Eisen;Douglas T. Ross;Greg Schuler

  • Proteins regulating Ras and its relatives.

    Mark S. Boguski;Frank McCormick

  • Detecting Subtle Sequence Signals: A Gibbs Sampling Strategy for Multiple Alignment

    Charles E. Lawrence;Stephen F. Altschul;Mark S. Boguski;Jun S. Liu

  • Positional Cloning of the Gene for Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia-Type 1

    Settara C. Chandrasekharappa;Siradanahalli C. Guru;Pachiappan Manickam;Shodimu Emmanuel Olufemi

  • Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes

    Gerald M. Rubin;Mark D. Yandell;Jennifer R. Wortman;George L. Gabor

  • dbEST — database for “expressed sequence tags”

    Mark S. Boguski;Todd M.J. Lowe;Carolyn M. Tolstoshev

  • A gene map of the human genome

    G. D. Schuler;M. S. Boguski;E. A. Stewart;L. D. Stein

  • Issues in searching molecular sequence databases.

    Stephen F. Altschul;Mark S. Boguski;Warren Gish;John C. Wootton

  • The NF1 locus encodes a protein functionally related to mammalian GAP and yeast IRA proteins.

    Roymarie Ballester;Douglas A. Marchuk;Douglas A. Marchuk;Mark Boguski;Ann M. Saulino;Ann M. Saulino

  • A Physical Map of 30,000 Human Genes

    P. Deloukas;G. D. Schuler;G. Gyapay;E. M. Beasley

  • A repeating amino acid motif in CDC23 defines a family of proteins and a new relationship among genes required for mitosis and RNA synthesis.

    Robert S. Sikorski;Mark S. Boguski;Mark Goebl;Philip Hieter

  • Gene expression informatics--it's all in your mine.

    Douglas E. Bassett;Michael B. Eisen;Mark S. Boguski

  • Experimental annotation of the human genome using microarray technology

    D. D. Shoemaker;E. E. Schadt;C. D. Armour;Y. D. He

  • Functional Genomics: It's All How You Read It

    Philip Hieter;Mark Boguski

  • ESTablishing a human transcript map.

    Mark S. Boguski;Gregory D. Schuler

  • Evolutionary parameters of the transcribed mammalian genome: An analysis of 2,820 orthologous rodent and human sequences

    Wojciech Makałowski;Mark S. Boguski

  • cDNA cloning of the type 1 neurofibromatosis gene: Complete sequence of the NF1 gene product

    Douglas A. Marchuk;Ann M. Saulino;Roxanne Tavakkol;Manju Swaroop

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey I. Gordon
Jeffrey I. Gordon Washington University in St. Louis
Wojciech Makalowski
Wojciech Makalowski University of Münster
Philip Hieter
Philip Hieter University of British Columbia
Francis S. Collins
Francis S. Collins National Institutes of Health
Thomas J. Hudson
Thomas J. Hudson Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Bruce A. Roe
Bruce A. Roe University of Oklahoma
Lincoln Stein
Lincoln Stein Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Richard M. Myers
Richard M. Myers HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine
Eric S. Lander
Eric S. Lander Broad Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in genetics opens doors to a range of related fields in healthcare and life sciences. Many students pursuing genetics also consider roles in medical administration, patient care, and health data management.

If you’re interested in the administrative side, an accelerated healthcare administration degree online can help you fast-track your leadership potential in hospitals, research labs, or public health organizations. Those seeking a more affordable pathway might consider a health administration degree to gain foundational business and management skills tailored to healthcare settings.

Prefer clinical or patient-focused roles? Look for the easiest nursing schools to get into and start a fulfilling hands-on healthcare career. Alternatively, if you’re interested in the growing field of health information, medical billing and coding certification programs offer flexible options to work closely with medical data and insurance processing.

Each of these online degrees provides unique pathways that complement genetics and can expand your options in the rapidly evolving healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Boguski

Recently Published Articles