World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
35
Citations
4735
World Ranking
2666
National Ranking
940

Marcus Hultmark publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Hultmark sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 210 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Marcus Hultmark D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Hultmark sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence

    Ivan Marusic;Jason Patrick Monty;Marcus Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • Turbulent pipe flow at extreme Reynolds numbers.

    Marcus Hultmark;Margit Vallikivi;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey;Alexander Smits

  • Turbulence measurements using a nanoscale thermal anemometry probe

    Sean C. C. Bailey;Gary J. Kunkel;Marcus Hultmark;Margit Vallikivi

  • Logarithmic scaling of turbulence in smooth- and rough-wall pipe flow

    Marcus Hultmark;Margit Vallikivi;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey;Alexander Smits

  • Fully resolved measurements of turbulent boundary layer flows up to

    M. Samie;I. Marusic;N. Hutchins;M. K. Fu

  • Spatial resolution correction for wall-bounded turbulence measurements

    Alexander Smits;Jason Patrick Monty;Marcus Hultmark;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey

  • Temperature corrections for constant temperature and constant current hot-wire anemometers

    Marcus Nils Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • The intermediate wake of a body of revolution at high Reynolds numbers

    Juan Jimenez;Marcus Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • Estimating the value of von Kármán’s constant in turbulent pipe flow

    Sean C C Bailey;Margit Vallikivi;Marcus Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • Turbulent boundary layer statistics at very high Reynolds number

    Margit Vallikivi;Marcus Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • The influence of building geometry on street canyon air flow: Validation of large eddy simulations against wind tunnel experiments

    Maider Llaguno-Munitxa;Elie Bou-Zeid;Marcus Hultmark

  • Turbulence spectra in smooth- and rough-wall pipe flow at extreme Reynolds numbers

    B. J. Rosenberg;Marcus Nils Hultmark;M. Vallikivi;S. C.C. Bailey

  • Obtaining accurate mean velocity measurements in high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers using Pitot tubes

    S C C Bailey;Marcus Hultmark;Jason Patrick Monty;P H Alfredsson

  • Turbulence measurements in pipe flow using a nano-scale thermal anemometry probe

    Margit Vallikivi;Marcus Hultmark;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey;Alexander Smits

  • Scaling of near-wall turbulence in pipe flow

    Marcus Hultmark;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey;Alexander Smits

  • Vertical-axis wind turbine experiments at full dynamic similarity

    Mark A. Miller;Subrahmanyam Duvvuri;Ian Brownstein;Marcus Lee;Marcus Lee

  • Liquid-infused surfaces as a passive method of turbulent drag reduction

    M. K. Fu;I. Arenas;S. Leonardi;Marcus Nils Hultmark

  • Flowfield measurements in the wake of a robotic lamprey

    Marcus Hultmark;Marcus Hultmark;Megan Leftwich;Alexander J. Smits

  • Azimuthal structure of turbulence in high Reynolds number pipe flow

    Sean C C Bailey;Marcus Nils Hultmark;Alexander Smits;Michael P. Schultz

  • Nanoscale sensing devices for turbulence measurements

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Smits
Alexander Smits Princeton University
Sean C. C. Bailey
Sean C. C. Bailey University of Kentucky
Ivan Marusic
Ivan Marusic University of Melbourne
Howard A. Stone
Howard A. Stone Princeton University
Jason Monty
Jason Monty University of Melbourne
Nicholas Hutchins
Nicholas Hutchins University of Melbourne
Marc B. Parlange
Marc B. Parlange University of Rhode Island
Craig B. Arnold
Craig B. Arnold Princeton University
Elie Bou-Zeid
Elie Bou-Zeid Princeton University
Beverley McKeon
Beverley McKeon California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often leads students to consider various related disciplines and career pathways. For those seeking flexible education opportunities, military personnel might find military friendly online speech pathology degree programs particularly accommodating. These programs are designed to support veterans through tailored schedules and benefits.

Additionally, students interested in faster degree completion can look into the best 5 year speech pathology programs which offer accelerated paths without compromising educational quality. This option can be attractive for those eager to enter the workforce sooner.

Beyond engineering, some graduates pursue roles in specialized fields that require a blend of technical and analytical skills. Careers like forensic profiling provide unique challenges and rewards, with competitive forensic profiler salary prospects indicating strong job market potential.

For those who want to expand their horizons, different counseling degrees offer alternative pathways that incorporate interpersonal and problem-solving skills. These diverse options highlight the importance of aligning education choices with both personal interests and long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus Hultmark

Recently Published Articles