World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 35 2666 2499 940 834 210 4735

Marcus Hultmark publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcus Hultmark between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcus Hultmark published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2018. 6 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2018. 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcus Hultmark: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 5
2008 2
2009 4
2010 9
2011 13
2012 13
2013 18
2014 7
2015 15
2016 16
2017 15
2018 23
2019 22
2020 13
2021 19
2022 11
2023 7
2024 7
2025 5
2026 1
Total 225
Download as CSV

Marcus Hultmark publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Hultmark sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 210 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125 210
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcus Hultmark D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Hultmark sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158 35
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence

    Ivan Marusic;Jason Patrick Monty;Marcus Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • Turbulent pipe flow at extreme Reynolds numbers.

    Marcus Hultmark;Margit Vallikivi;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey;Alexander Smits

  • Turbulence measurements using a nanoscale thermal anemometry probe

    Sean C. C. Bailey;Gary J. Kunkel;Marcus Hultmark;Margit Vallikivi

  • Logarithmic scaling of turbulence in smooth- and rough-wall pipe flow

    Marcus Hultmark;Margit Vallikivi;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey;Alexander Smits

  • Fully resolved measurements of turbulent boundary layer flows up to

    M. Samie;I. Marusic;N. Hutchins;M. K. Fu

  • Spatial resolution correction for wall-bounded turbulence measurements

    Alexander Smits;Jason Patrick Monty;Marcus Hultmark;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey

  • Temperature corrections for constant temperature and constant current hot-wire anemometers

    Marcus Nils Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • The intermediate wake of a body of revolution at high Reynolds numbers

    Juan Jimenez;Marcus Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • Estimating the value of von Kármán’s constant in turbulent pipe flow

    Sean C C Bailey;Margit Vallikivi;Marcus Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • Turbulent boundary layer statistics at very high Reynolds number

    Margit Vallikivi;Marcus Hultmark;Alexander Smits

  • The influence of building geometry on street canyon air flow: Validation of large eddy simulations against wind tunnel experiments

    Maider Llaguno-Munitxa;Elie Bou-Zeid;Marcus Hultmark

  • Turbulence spectra in smooth- and rough-wall pipe flow at extreme Reynolds numbers

    B. J. Rosenberg;Marcus Nils Hultmark;M. Vallikivi;S. C.C. Bailey

  • Obtaining accurate mean velocity measurements in high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers using Pitot tubes

    S C C Bailey;Marcus Hultmark;Jason Patrick Monty;P H Alfredsson

  • Turbulence measurements in pipe flow using a nano-scale thermal anemometry probe

    Margit Vallikivi;Marcus Hultmark;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey;Alexander Smits

  • Scaling of near-wall turbulence in pipe flow

    Marcus Hultmark;Sean Christoper Collison Bailey;Alexander Smits

  • Vertical-axis wind turbine experiments at full dynamic similarity

    Mark A. Miller;Subrahmanyam Duvvuri;Ian Brownstein;Marcus Lee;Marcus Lee

  • Liquid-infused surfaces as a passive method of turbulent drag reduction

    M. K. Fu;I. Arenas;S. Leonardi;Marcus Nils Hultmark

  • Flowfield measurements in the wake of a robotic lamprey

    Marcus Hultmark;Marcus Hultmark;Megan Leftwich;Alexander J. Smits

  • Azimuthal structure of turbulence in high Reynolds number pipe flow

    Sean C C Bailey;Marcus Nils Hultmark;Alexander Smits;Michael P. Schultz

  • Nanoscale sensing devices for turbulence measurements

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Smits
Alexander Smits Princeton University
Sean C. C. Bailey
Sean C. C. Bailey University of Kentucky
Ivan Marusic
Ivan Marusic University of Melbourne
Howard A. Stone
Howard A. Stone Princeton University
Jason Monty
Jason Monty University of Melbourne
Nicholas Hutchins
Nicholas Hutchins University of Melbourne
Marc B. Parlange
Marc B. Parlange University of Rhode Island
Craig B. Arnold
Craig B. Arnold Princeton University
Elie Bou-Zeid
Elie Bou-Zeid Princeton University
Beverley McKeon
Beverley McKeon California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often leads students to consider various related disciplines and career pathways. For those seeking flexible education opportunities, military personnel might find military friendly online speech pathology degree programs particularly accommodating. These programs are designed to support veterans through tailored schedules and benefits.

Additionally, students interested in faster degree completion can look into the best 5 year speech pathology programs which offer accelerated paths without compromising educational quality. This option can be attractive for those eager to enter the workforce sooner.

Beyond engineering, some graduates pursue roles in specialized fields that require a blend of technical and analytical skills. Careers like forensic profiling provide unique challenges and rewards, with competitive forensic profiler salary prospects indicating strong job market potential.

For those who want to expand their horizons, different counseling degrees offer alternative pathways that incorporate interpersonal and problem-solving skills. These diverse options highlight the importance of aligning education choices with both personal interests and long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus Hultmark

Recently Published Articles