World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
40
Citations
5957
World Ranking
2316
National Ranking
69

Manuela A. Joore publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuela A. Joore sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 236 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Manuela A. Joore D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuela A. Joore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

    M. Westwood;M. Joore;J.P.C. Grutters;K. Redekop

  • How costly is particle therapy? Cost analysis of external beam radiotherapy with carbon-ions, protons and photons

    Andrea Peeters;Janneke P.C. Grutters;Madelon Pijls-Johannesma;Stefan Reimoser

  • High-sensitivity troponin assays for the early rule-out or diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

    Marie Westwood;Thea van Asselt;Bram Ramaekers;Penny F Whiting

  • GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.

    Jan L Brozek;Carlos Canelo-Aybar;Elie A Akl;James M Bowen

  • Current and future medical costs of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in The Netherlands.

    M P Rutten-van Mölken;Maarten Postma;M A Joore;M L Van Genugten

  • Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) mutation testing in adults with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

    Marie Westwood;Manuela Joore;Penny F Whiting;Thea van Asselt

  • Tinnitus: a cost study.

    Iris H. L. Maes;Rilana F. F. Cima;Johannes W. Vlaeyen;Lucien J. C. Anteunis

  • Procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic therapy for the treatment of sepsis in intensive care settings and for suspected bacterial infection in emergency department settings: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Marie Westwood;Bram Ramaekers;Penny Whiting;Florian Tomini

  • Risk scores to guide referral decisions for people with suspected ovarian cancer in secondary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Marie Westwood;Bram Ramaekers;Shona Lang;Sabine Grimm

  • Joint recovery programme versus usual care: an economic evaluation of a clinical pathway for joint replacement surgery.

    Daniëlle E Brunenberg;Mike J van Steyn;Judith C Sluimer;Linda L Bekebrede

  • Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints

    Janneke P. C. Grutters;Manuela A. Joore;Frans van der Horst;Hans Verschuure

  • Cost-effectiveness of the 70-gene signature versus St. Gallen guidelines and Adjuvant Online for early breast cancer

    Valesca P. Retèl;Manuela A. Joore;Michael Knauer;Sabine C. Linn

  • Health-related quality of life in patients surviving non-small cell lung cancer

    Janneke P C Grutters;Manuela A Joore;Erwin M Wiegman;Johannes A Langendijk

  • Cost Evaluation of Dried Blood Spot Home Sampling as Compared to Conventional Sampling for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Children.

    Lisa C. Martial;Rob E. Aarnoutse;Michiel F. Schreuder;Stefanie S. Henriet

  • The cost-effectiveness of particle therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: exploring decision uncertainty and areas for future research.

    Janneke P.C. Grutters;Madelon Pijls-Johannesma;Dirk De Ruysscher;Andrea Peeters

  • Response shift in the measurement of quality of life in hearing impaired adults after hearing aid fitting.

    M.A. Joore;J. Potjewijd;A.A. Timmerman;L.J.C. Anteunis

  • The Impact of Differences in EQ-5D and SF-6D Utility Scores on the Acceptability of Cost–Utility Ratios: Results across Five Trial-Based Cost–Utility Studies

    Manuela A Joore;Danielle Brunenberg;Patricia Nelemans;Emiel Wouters

  • Acknowledging Patient Heterogeneity in Economic Evaluation A Systematic Literature Review

    Janneke P. C. Grutters;Mark Sculpher;Andrew H. Briggs;Johan L. Severens

  • Willingness to Accept versus Willingness to Pay in a Discrete Choice Experiment

    Janneke P.C. Grutters;Alfons G.H. Kessels;Carmen D. Dirksen;Debby van Helvoort-Postulart

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis of sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin A treatment for patients with idiopathic overactive bladder.

    Randall K. Leong;Stephan G. G. de Wachter;Manuela A. Joore;Philip E. V. A. Van Kerrebroeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan L. Severens
Johan L. Severens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jos Kleijnen
Jos Kleijnen Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
Dirk De Ruysscher
Dirk De Ruysscher Maastricht University
Hans Bosma
Hans Bosma Maastricht University
Martin H. Prins
Martin H. Prins Maastricht University
Philippe Lambin
Philippe Lambin Maastricht University
Annelies Boonen
Annelies Boonen Maastricht University Medical Centre
Frans R.J. Verhey
Frans R.J. Verhey Maastricht University
Emiel F.M. Wouters
Emiel F.M. Wouters Maastricht University
Arno W. Hoes
Arno W. Hoes Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Manuela A. Joore

Recently Published Articles