World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 31 2822 2671 25 24 154 4102

Malaika Brengman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Malaika Brengman between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Malaika Brengman published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2019. 3 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2019. 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1999 2025

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Malaika Brengman: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 5
2000 4
2001 9
2002 7
2003 9
2004 10
2005 12
2006 7
2007 8
2008 6
2009 10
2010 9
2011 13
2012 6
2013 4
2014 6
2015 5
2016 4
2017 7
2018 4
2019 18
2020 11
2021 9
2022 7
2023 5
2024 1
2025 2
Total 198
Download as CSV

Malaika Brengman publications per year - data summary

  • Malaika Brengman, a Business and Management scholar from Vrije Universiteit Brussel, has 198 publications recorded across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1999 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 18 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2024, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 7.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.3 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 24 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1999-2007: 71 publications (7.9 per year); 2008-2016: 63 publications (7.0 per year); 2017-2025: 64 publications (7.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Malaika Brengman publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malaika Brengman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 150–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 154 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85 154
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Malaika Brengman publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Malaika Brengman, a Business and Management scholar from Vrije Universiteit Brussel, records 154 publications - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Malaika Brengman, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Malaika Brengman ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Malaika Brengman D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malaika Brengman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159 31
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Malaika Brengman D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Malaika Brengman, a Business and Management scholar from Vrije Universiteit Brussel, records 31 D-Index - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Malaika Brengman, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Malaika Brengman ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Best Publications

  • When brands come to life: experimental research on the vividness effect of Virtual Reality in transformational marketing communications

    Helena Kerrebroeck;Malaika Brengman;Kim Willems

  • Segmenting Internet shoppers based on their Web-usage-related lifestyle: a cross-cultural validation

    Malaika Brengman;Maggie Geuens;Maggie Geuens;Bert Weijters;Scott M. Smith

  • Escaping the crowd: An experimental study on the impact of a Virtual Reality experience in a shopping mall.

    Helena Van Kerrebroeck;Malaika Brengman;Kim Willems;Kim Willems

  • Developing a typology of airport shoppers

    Maggie Geuens;Delphine Vantomme;Malaika Brengman

  • The Effect of Website Design Dimensions on Initial Trust: A Synthesis of the Empirical Literature

    Farhod P. Karimov;Malaika Brengman;Leo Van Hove

  • The path-to-purchase is paved with digital opportunities: An inventory of shopper-oriented retail technologies

    Kim Willems;Kim Willems;Annelien Smolders;Malaika Brengman;Kris Luyten

  • Food retailing, now and in the future: a consumer perspective

    Maggie Geuens;Malaika Brengman;Rosette S’Jegers

  • The effect of web communities on consumers' initial trust in B2C e‐commerce websites

    Malaika Brengman;Farhod P. Karimov

  • The effects of urban retail greenery on consumer experience: Reviewing the evidence from a restorative perspective

    Yannick Joye;Kim Willems;Malaika Brengman;Kathleen Wolf

  • The Four Dimensional Impact of Color on ShopperS Emotions

    Malaika Brengman;Maggie Geuens

  • The Impact of In-Store Greenery on Customers

    Malaika Brengman;Kim Willems;Yannick Joye

  • Determinants of fashion store personality: a consumer perspective

    Malaika Brengman;Kim Willems

  • The impact of representation media on customer engagement in tourism marketing among millennials

    Kim Willems;Malaika Brengman;Helena Van Kerrebroeck

  • The impact of consumer characteristics and campaign related factors on brand confusion in print advertising

    Malaika Brengman;Maggie Geuens;Patrick De Pelsmacker

  • Can’t touch this: the impact of augmented reality versus touch and non-touch interfaces on perceived ownership

    Malaika Brengman;Kim Willems;Kim Willems;Helena Van Kerrebroeck

  • Leveraging advertising to a higher dimension: experimental research on the impact of virtual reality on brand personality impressions

    Laurens De Gauquier;Malaika Brengman;Malaika Brengman;Kim Willems;Kim Willems;Helena Van Kerrebroeck

  • From stopping to shopping: An observational study comparing a humanoid service robot with a tablet service kiosk to attract and convert shoppers

    Malaika Brengman;Laurens De Gauquier;Kim Willems;Bram Vanderborght

  • From Armani to Zara: Impression Formation Based on Fashion Store Patronage

    Kim Willems;Kim Willems;Wim Janssens;Gilbert Swinnen;Malaika Brengman

  • Are culturally congruent websites more effective? An overview of a decade of empirical evidence

    Femke Vyncke;Malaika Brengman

  • An Exploratory Study of Grocery Shopping Motivations

    Maggie Geuens;Malaika Brengman;Rosette SJegers

Frequent Co-Authors

Maggie Geuens
Maggie Geuens Ghent University
Bram Vanderborght
Bram Vanderborght Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Frédéric Leroy
Frédéric Leroy Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Cathy Macharis
Cathy Macharis Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Johannes Schöning
Johannes Schöning University of St. Gallen
Paul Matthyssens
Paul Matthyssens University of Milano-Bicocca
Patrick De Pelsmacker
Patrick De Pelsmacker University of Antwerp
Romain Meeusen
Romain Meeusen Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Luc Steels
Luc Steels Spanish National Research Council
Dirk Lefeber
Dirk Lefeber Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Malaika Brengman

Recently Published Articles