World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maarten V. de Hoop

Maarten V. de Hoop

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 42 1796 1562 769 624 282 7074

Maarten V. de Hoop publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maarten V. de Hoop between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maarten V. de Hoop published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2019. 3 of the 341 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2019. 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

341 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maarten V. de Hoop: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 3
1992 3
1993 3
1994 2
1995 3
1996 13
1997 4
1998 3
1999 3
2000 8
2001 5
2002 8
2003 6
2004 5
2005 15
2006 11
2007 7
2008 7
2009 12
2010 15
2011 13
2012 20
2013 16
2014 11
2015 14
2016 16
2017 19
2018 14
2019 33
2020 18
2021 20
2022 3
2023 3
2024 2
2025 2
2026 1
Total 341
Download as CSV

Maarten V. de Hoop publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maarten V. de Hoop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 282–286 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 282 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31 282
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Maarten V. de Hoop D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maarten V. de Hoop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93 42
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Maarten V. de Hoop is affiliated with Rice University in the United States. Their main fields of study include Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering, with significant contributions in Geophysics, Control and Systems Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's research focuses extensively on seismic imaging and inversion techniques, seismic waves and analysis, elasticity and material modeling, seismology and earthquake studies, stability and controllability of differential equations, advanced mathematical modeling in engineering, and high-pressure geophysics and materials.

Recent publications by Maarten V. de Hoop include:

  • Recovery of wave speeds and density of mass across a heterogeneous smooth interface from acoustic and elastic wave reflection operators, 2022, GEM - International Journal on Geomathematics
  • A Non-perturbative Approach to Computing Seismic Normal Modes in Rotating Planets, 2022, Journal of Scientific Computing
  • SeisLM: a Foundation Model for Seismic Waveforms, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Interconnected Hierarchical Structures for Fast Direct Elliptic Solution, 2022, Journal of Scientific Computing
  • Higher-order Hamilton-Jacobi perturbation theory for anisotropic heterogeneous media: dynamic ray tracing in ray-centred coordinates, 2021, Geophysical Journal International

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Maarten V. de Hoop include:

  • Joonas Ilmavirta
  • Gen Nakamura
  • Vitaly Katsnelson
  • Ching-Lung Lin
  • Sombuddha Bhattacharyya

Publications by this scientist are often found in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Scientific Computing
  • Geophysical Journal International
  • GEM - International Journal on Geomathematics
  • Computers & Mathematics with Applications

Best Publications

  • Surface-wave array tomography in SE Tibet from ambient seismic noise and two-station analysis: I - Phase velocity maps

    Huajian Yao;Robert D. van der Hilst;Maarten V. de Hoop

  • Generalization of the phase-screen approximation for the scattering of acoustic waves

    Maarten V. de Hoop;Jérôme H. Le Rousseau;Ru-Shan Wu

  • Focusing in dip and AVA compensation on scattering‐angle/azimuth common image gathers

    Sverre Brandsberg-Dahl;Maarten V. de Hoop;Bjorn Ursin

  • Generalization of the Bremmer coupling series

    Maarten V. de Hoop

  • Modeling and imaging with the scalar generalized‐screen algorithms in isotropic media

    Jéro⁁me H. Le Rousseau;Maarten V. de Hoop

  • On 3D modeling of seismic wave propagation via a structured parallel multifrontal direct Helmholtz solver

    Shen Wang;Maarten V. de Hoop;Jianlin Xia

  • Leading-order seismic imaging using curvelets

    Huub Douma;Maarten V. de Hoop

  • Method of processing seismic data

    Maarten Valentijn De Hoop;Robert Burridge;Carl Peter Spencer

  • Multiparameter inversion in anisotropic elastic media

    Robert Burridge;Maarten V. de Hoop;Douglas Miller;Carl Spencer

  • Microlocal analysis of seismic inverse scattering in anisotropic elastic media

    Christiaan C. Stolk;Maarten V. De Hoop

  • Generalized Radon transform inversions for reflectivity in anisotropic elastic media

    Maarten V de Hoop;Norman Bleistein

  • Banana-doughnut kernels and mantle tomography

    Robert D. van der Hilst;Maarten V. de Hoop;Maarten V. de Hoop

  • On sensitivity kernels for ‘wave-equation’ transmission tomography

    Maarten V. de Hoop;Robert D. van der Hilst

  • Local analysis of inverse problems: Hölder stability and iterative reconstruction

    Maarten V de Hoop;Lingyun Qiu;Otmar Scherzer

  • Efficient Scalable Algorithms for Solving Dense Linear Systems with Hierarchically Semiseparable Structures

    Shen Wang;Xiaoye S. Li;Jianlin Xia;Yingchong Situ

  • The resolving power of seismic amplitude data: An anisotropic inversion/migration approach

    Maarten V. de Hoop;Carl Spencer;Robert Burridge

  • Seismic imaging with the generalized Radon transform: a curvelet transform perspective *

    M V de Hoop;H Smith;G Uhlmann;R D van der Hilst

  • Massively parallel structured multifrontal solver for time-harmonic elastic waves in 3-D anisotropic media

    Shen Wang;Maarten V. de Hoop;Jianlin Xia;Xiaoye S. Li

  • Microlocal Analysis and Global Solutions of Some Hyperbolic Equations with Discontinuous Coefficients

    G. Hörmann;Maarten V. de Hoop

  • Lipschitz Stability of an Inverse Boundary Value Problem for a Schrödinger-Type Equation

    Elena Beretta;Maarten V. de Hoop;Lingyun Qiu

Frequent Co-Authors

Gunther Uhlmann
Gunther Uhlmann University of Washington
Michel Campillo
Michel Campillo Grenoble Alpes University
Otmar Scherzer
Otmar Scherzer University of Vienna
Giovanni Alessandrini
Giovanni Alessandrini University of Trieste
Matti Lassas
Matti Lassas University of Helsinki
Xiaoye S. Li
Xiaoye S. Li Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Yousef Saad
Yousef Saad University of Minnesota
András Vasy
András Vasy Stanford University
David A. Yuen
David A. Yuen Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Mathematics, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. For example, business-oriented students often consider the fastest mba online programs to quickly gain management skills that complement analytical abilities developed in math studies.

Marketing is another popular field for math graduates, especially those focused on data-driven strategies. Exploring the cheapest online marketing degree options can lead to cost-effective ways of entering lucrative roles in digital marketing and analytics.

Time is often a key factor for working professionals as well. Opting for one year mba program offerings can accelerate career advancement while minimizing time away from the workforce.

Additionally, flexibility in education is vital. Many students wonder, can you transfer mba programs? Understanding credit transfer policies helps learners navigate changes in their academic journey without losing progress.

Overall, leveraging these related online degrees can diversify your skill set and enhance your career prospects in competitive industries.

Best Scientists Citing Maarten V. de Hoop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles