World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
40
Citations
19391
World Ranking
1980
National Ranking
141

M. A. Crisfield publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. A. Crisfield sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 117 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

M. A. Crisfield D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. A. Crisfield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures

    René de Borst;M. A. Crisfield

  • Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures

    de R. Borst;M.A. Crisfield;J.J.C. Remmers;C.V. Verhoosel

  • Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues

    G. Alfano;M. A. Crisfield

  • A fast incremental/iterative solution procedure that handles “snap-through”

    Unknown

  • Progressive Delamination Using Interface Elements

    Unknown

  • A consistent co-rotational formulation for non-linear, three-dimensional, beam-elements

    M.A. Crisfield

  • An arc‐length method including line searches and accelerations

    Unknown

  • Geometrically exact 3D beam theory: implementation of a strain-invariant finite element for statics and dynamics

    Gordan Jelenić;M. A. Crisfield

  • Energy‐conserving and decaying Algorithms in non‐linear structural dynamics

    D. Kuhl;M. A. Crisfield

  • Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures: Advanced Topics

    Unknown

  • Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Essentials

    Unknown

  • Predicting Progressive Delamination of Composite Material Specimens via Interface Elements

    Jiye Chen;M. Crisfield;A. J. Kinloch;E.P. Busso

  • Dynamics of 3-D co-rotational beams

    M. A. Crisfield;U. Galvanetto;Gordan Jelenić

  • A unified co-rotational framework for solids, shells and beams

    Unknown

  • A faster modified newton-raphson iteration

    Unknown

  • A FAST INCREMENTAL/ITERATIVE SOLUTION PROCEDURE THAT HANDLES “SNAP-THROUGH”

    Unknown

  • Solution strategies for the delamination analysis based on a combination of local-control arc-length and line searches

    G. Alfano;M. A. Crisfield

  • A consistent co‐rotational formulation for shells using the constant stress/constant moment triangle

    X. Peng;M. A. Crisfield

  • A new arc-length method for handling sharp snap-backs

    Unknown

  • An interface element formulation for the simulation of delamination with buckling

    Y. Qiu;M.A. Crisfield;G. Alfano

Frequent Co-Authors

Ugo Galvanetto
Ugo Galvanetto University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering are highly specialized fields, students often explore related disciplines to diversify their career options. One such area is communication sciences and disorders, which offers growth through online programs that emphasize speech pathology and audiology skills. Exploring communication sciences and disorders programs can provide valuable insight into fields that complement engineering careers focused on human-machine interaction and ergonomics.

For those considering flexible learning options, understanding the cost of online speech pathology degree programs is vital. These programs often carry different tuition frameworks compared to traditional engineering degrees, which may influence budgeting and financial planning for students and working professionals alike.

Veterans transitioning from military service to engineering or allied fields may find support through online speech pathology degrees for veterans. These tailored programs offer flexible scheduling and veteran-friendly resources, helping to bridge the gap between military experience and civilian engineering or health science careers.

Lastly, for students eager to accelerate their education, reviewing accelerated slp programs can reveal strategies to complete degrees faster without compromising quality. Similar pathways exist in engineering education, underscoring the importance of exploring all options for timely career entry.

Best Scientists Citing M. A. Crisfield