World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
8762
World Ranking
4784
National Ranking
62

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
51
Citations
8264
World Ranking
3939
National Ranking
50

Lisbeth M. Ottosen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisbeth M. Ottosen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 331 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Lisbeth M. Ottosen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisbeth M. Ottosen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisbeth M. Ottosen is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with specific contributions to civil and structural engineering, building and construction, electrical and electronic engineering, earth-surface processes, and mechanical engineering.

Their work explores several topics that include:

  • Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Building materials and conservation
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

Ottosen has published in multiple research venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Construction and Building Materials
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Materials
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Association Universitaire de Génie Civil

Recent papers include:

  • "Utilization of acid-washed sewage sludge ash as sand or cement replacement in concrete," 2021, Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • "Recovering rare earth elements from contaminated soils: Critical overview of current remediation technologies," 2020, Chemosphere
  • "Electrodialytically treated MSWI fly ash use in clay bricks," 2020, Construction and Building Materials
  • "Reaction mechanisms of wood ash for use as a partial cement replacement," 2021, Construction and Building Materials
  • "Phase development and mechanical response of low-level cement replacements with wood ash and washed wood ash," 2020, Construction and Building Materials

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include:

  • Gunvor M. Kirkelund
  • Ida Maria Gieysztor Bertelsen
  • Pernille Erland Jensen
  • Ana T. Lima
  • Wolfgang Kunther

Best Publications

  • Possible applications for municipal solid waste fly ash

    Celia Ferreira;Alexandra B. Ribeiro;L. Ottosen

  • Electrodialytic Remediation of Soil Polluted with Copper from Wood Preservation Industry

    Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Henrik K. Hansen;Søren Laursen;Arne Villumsen

  • Extracting phosphorous from incinerated sewage sludge ash rich in iron or aluminum.

    Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Gunvor M. Kirkelund;Pernille E. Jensen

  • Electrodialytic Removal of Cu, Cr, and As from Chromated Copper Arsenate-Treated Timber Waste

    Alexandra B. Ribeiro;Eduardo P. Mateus;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Gregers Bech-Nielsen

  • Phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge ash through an electrodialytic process

    Paula Guedes;Nazaré Couto;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Alexandra B. Ribeiro

  • Electrodialytic remediation of soils polluted with Cu, Cr, Hg, Pb and Zn†

    Henrik K. Hansen;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Bodil K. Kliem;Arne Villumsen

  • Selenium removal from petroleum refinery wastewater using an electrocoagulation technique.

    Henrik K. Hansen;Sebastián Franco Peña;Claudia Gutiérrez;Andrea Lazo

  • Electrodialytic removal of cadmium from wastewater sludge

    Mathilde R Jakobsen;Janne Fritt-Rasmussen;Signe Nielsen;Lisbeth M Ottosen

  • Water splitting at ion-exchange membranes and potential differences in soil during electrodialytic soil remediation

    L. M. Ottosen;H. K. Hansen;C. B. Hansen

  • Removal of Cu, Pb and Zn in an applied electric field in calcareous and non-calcareous soils

    Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Henrik K. Hansen;Alexandra B. Ribeiro;Arne Villumsen

  • Characterization of fly ash from bio and municipal waste

    Ana T. Lima;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Anne Juul Pedersen;Alexandra B. Ribeiro

  • Speciation and mobility of cadmium in straw and wood combustion fly ash

    Henrik K. Hansen;Anne J. Pedersen;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Arne Villumsen

  • Electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from different fly ashes: Influence of heavy metal speciation in the ashes

    Anne Juul Pedersen;Lisbeth M Ottosen;Arne Villumsen

  • Comparison of two different electrodialytic cells for separation of phosphorus and heavy metals from sewage sludge ash.

    Benjamin Ebbers;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Pernille Erland Jensen

  • Electrodialytic treatment of municipal wastewater and sludge for the removal of heavy metals and recovery of phosphorus

    Benjamin Ebbers;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Pernille Erland Jensen

  • Electrodialytic Remediation of Copper Mine Tailings

    H.K. Hansen;A. Rojo;L.M. Ottosen

  • Removal of selected heavy metals from MSW fly ash by the electrodialytic process

    Célia Maria Dias Ferreira;Pernille Erland Jensen;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Alexandra Ribeiro

  • Electrodialytic remediation of suspended mine tailings.

    Henrik K. Hansen;Adrian Rojo;Denisse Pino;Lisbeth M. Ottosen

  • Electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash using ammonium citrate as assisting agent.

    Anne Juul Pedersen;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Arne Villumsen

  • Environmental Electrokinetics for a sustainable subsurface

    A.T. Lima;A. Hofmann;D.R. Reynolds;C.J. Ptacek

  • Investigations of Cu, Pb and Zn partitioning by sequential extraction in harbour sediments after electrodialytic remediation.

    Gunvor M. Kirkelund;Lisbeth M. Ottosen;Arne Villumsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Rasmus Jakobsen
Rasmus Jakobsen Technical University of Denmark
Henrik Hauggaard-Nielsen
Henrik Hauggaard-Nielsen Roskilde University
Akram N. Alshawabkeh
Akram N. Alshawabkeh Northeastern University
X.R. Nóvoa
X.R. Nóvoa Universidade de Vigo
Bert Allard
Bert Allard Örebro University
Henrik Stang
Henrik Stang Technical University of Denmark
Marta Pazos
Marta Pazos Universidade de Vigo
Thomas Fruergaard Astrup
Thomas Fruergaard Astrup Technical University of Denmark
João A. Labrincha
João A. Labrincha University of Aveiro
Pawel Wargocki
Pawel Wargocki Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology often opens doors to a wide variety of advanced career options. Many students and professionals enhance their prospects by supplementing their technical skills with business and management education—often through flexible online degrees.

For those interested in optimizing processes and leading technical teams, an mba in operations management online can provide targeted training in operations, logistics, and resource management. This is ideal for future managers in engineering sectors.

The convenience of one year online mba programs no gmat has made advanced business education more accessible. These programs allow you to gain valuable business acumen without traditional entrance requirements.

Affordability is another key factor. If budget is a concern, consider an online mba under 35k to get quality education without high costs.

Additionally, digital transformation is creating demand across all industries for technology professionals with expertise in social platforms. Earning degrees in social media can help you combine tech skills with digital marketing, expanding your career pathways in both tech and creative industries.

Best Scientists Citing Lisbeth M. Ottosen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles