World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5492
World Ranking
9859
National Ranking
1239

Lining Xing publications per year

2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 26 publications 2026: 1 publications
2006 2026

265 publications in total across all disciplines

Lining Xing publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lining Xing sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 214 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lining Xing D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lining Xing sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A Knowledge-Based Ant Colony Optimization for Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problems

    Li-Ning Xing;Ying-Wu Chen;Peng Wang;Qing-Song Zhao

  • Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns

    Jian Xiong;Jian Xiong;Li-ning Xing;Ying-wu Chen

  • Behavior of crossover operators in NSGA-III for large-scale optimization problems

    Jiao-Hong Yi;Jiao-Hong Yi;Li-Ning Xing;Gai-Ge Wang;Junyu Dong

  • A Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm for Scheduling a Single Batch-Processing Machine With Arbitrary Job Sizes and Release Times

    Shengchao Zhou;Lining Xing;Xu Zheng;Ni Du

  • Agile Earth Observation Satellite Scheduling Over 20 Years: Formulations, Methods, and Future Directions

    Xinwei Wang;Guohua Wu;Lining Xing;Witold Pedrycz

  • Multi-objective flexible job shop schedule: Design and evaluation by simulation modeling

    Li-Ning Xing;Ying-Wu Chen;Ke-Wei Yang

  • An efficient search method for multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problems

    Li-Ning Xing;Ying-Wu Chen;Ke-Wei Yang

  • RL-GA: A Reinforcement Learning-based Genetic Algorithm for Electromagnetic Detection Satellite Scheduling Problem

    Unknown

  • A Generic Markov Decision Process Model and Reinforcement Learning Method for Scheduling Agile Earth Observation Satellites

    Yongming He;Lining Xing;Yingwu Chen;Witold Pedrycz

  • An Improved Ant Colony Optimization algorithm to the Periodic Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Window and Service Choice

    Yuan Wang;Ling Wang;Guangcai Chen;Zhaoquan Cai

  • An improved genetic algorithm for the integrated satellite imaging and data transmission scheduling problem

    Unknown

  • A Data-Driven Parallel Scheduling Approach for Multiple Agile Earth Observation Satellites

    Yonghao Du;Tao Wang;Bin Xin;Ling Wang

  • Agile earth observation satellite scheduling: An orienteering problem with time-dependent profits and travel times

    Guansheng Peng;Guansheng Peng;Reginald Dewil;Cédric Verbeeck;Aldy Gunawan

  • A Hybrid Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for the Extended Capacitated Arc Routing Problem

    Li-Ning Xing;P. Rohlfshagen;Ying-Wu Chen;Xin Yao

  • An Evolutionary Approach to the Multidepot Capacitated Arc Routing Problem

    Lining Xing;Philipp Rohlfshagen;Yingwu Chen;Xin Yao

  • An Adaptive Resource Allocation Strategy for Objective Space Partition-Based Multiobjective Optimization

    Huangke Chen;Guohua Wu;Witold Pedrycz;Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan

  • Hierarchical scheduling for real-time agile satellite task scheduling in a dynamic environment

    Lei He;Xiao-Lu Liu;Ying-Wu Chen;Li-Ning Xing

  • Improved ant colony optimization for the vehicle routing problem with split pickup and split delivery

    Unknown

  • An exact algorithm for Agile Earth Observation Satellite Scheduling with time-dependent profits

    Guansheng Peng;Guansheng Peng;Guopeng Song;Guopeng Song;Lining Xing;Aldy Gunawan

  • Deep reinforcement learning method for satellite range scheduling problem

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Ling Wang
Ling Wang Tsinghua University
Witold Pedrycz
Witold Pedrycz University of Alberta
Yongquan Zhou
Yongquan Zhou Guangxi University for Nationalities
Hisao Ishibuchi
Hisao Ishibuchi Southern University of Science and Technology
Xin Yao
Xin Yao Lingnan University
Athanasios V. Vasilakos
Athanasios V. Vasilakos University of Agder
Amir H. Alavi
Amir H. Alavi University of Pittsburgh
Gai-Ge Wang
Gai-Ge Wang Ocean University of China

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Lining Xing

Recently Published Articles