World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
9595
World Ranking
6365
National Ranking
3062

Linda E. Saltzman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda E. Saltzman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 64 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Linda E. Saltzman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda E. Saltzman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda E. Saltzman is affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. This association places them within a leading public health institution focused on disease control and health promotion on a national scale.

Details of their recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, specific fields of study, subfields, and main research topics are not available. Similarly, there is no available information on any awards received by this researcher.

Despite the absence of detailed publication and research topic data, the affiliation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggests involvement in public health, epidemiology, or related research domains, given the institution's core mission. However, specific contributions or thematic areas cannot be identified from the current dataset.

Linda E. Saltzman is currently active and not deceased according to available information.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of Violence Against Pregnant Women

    Julie A. Gazmararian;Suzanne Lazorick;Alison M. Spitz;Terri J. Ballard

  • Intimate partner violence surveillance : uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 1.0

    Linda E. Saltzman;Janet L. Fanslow;Pamela M. McMahon;Gene A. Shelley

  • Screening for intimate partner violence by health care providers. Barriers and interventions

    Jill Waalen;Mary M Goodwin;Alison M Spitz;Ruth Petersen

  • Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter?

    Raymond Paternoster;Linda E. Saltzman;Gordon P. Waldo;Theodore G. Chiricos

  • The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns.

    J. A. Gazmararian;M. M. Adams;Linda E. Saltzman;C. H. Johnson

  • Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions.

    Julie A. Gazmararian;Ruth Petersen;Alison M. Spitz;Mary M. Goodwin

  • Sexual violence surveillance; uniform definitions and recommended data elements

    Kathleen C. Basile;Linda E. Saltzman

  • Physical Abuse Around the Time of Pregnancy: An Examination of Prevalence and Risk Factors in 16 States

    Linda E. Saltzman;Christopher H. Johnson;Brenda Colley Gilbert;Mary M. Goodwin

  • Attempted suicide among young adults: progress toward a meaningful estimate of prevalence.

    Patrick J. Meehan;Jane A. Lamb;Linda E. Saltzman;Patrick W. O'Carroll

  • Fatal violence among spouses in the United States, 1976-85.

    James A. Mercy;Linda E. Saltzman

  • Pregnancy intendedness and physical abuse around the time of pregnancy: findings from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 1996-1997. PRAMS Working Group. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

    Mary M. Goodwin;Julie A. Gazmararian;Christopher H. Johnson;Brenda Colley Gilbert

  • Homicide: A Leading Cause of Injury Deaths Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the United States, 1991–1999

    Jeani Chang;Cynthia J. Berg;Linda E. Saltzman;Joy Herndon

  • Deterrent and Experiential Effects: the Problem of Causal Order in Perceptual Deterrence Research

    Linda Saltzman;Raymond Paternoster;Gordon P. Waldo;Theodore G. Chiricos

  • Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence victimization among U.S. adults, 2001-2003.

    Kathleen C. Basile;Jianfeng Chen;Michele C. Black;Linda E. Saltzman

  • Self-reported childhood and adolescent sexual abuse among adult homosexual and bisexual men☆

    Lynda S. Doll;Dan Joy;Brad N. Bartholow;Janet S. Harrison

  • Violence and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature and directions for future research.

    Ruth Petersen;Julie A. Gazmararian;Alison M. Spitz;Diane L. Rowley

  • Surveillance for homicide among intimate partners--United States, 1981-1998.

    Leonard J. Paulozzi;Linda E. Saltzman;Martie P. Thompson;P. Holmgreen

  • Weapon Involvement and Injury Outcomes in Family and Intimate Assaults

    Linda E. Saltzman;James A. Mercy;Patrick W. O'Carroll;Mark L. Rosenberg

  • Stalking in the United States recent national prevalence estimates

    Kathleen C. Basile;Monica H. Swahn;Jianfeng Chen;Linda E. Saltzman

  • The Association between Self-Reported Lifetime History of Forced Sexual Intercourse and Recent Health-Risk Behaviors: Findings from the 2003 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey

    Kathleen C. Basile;Michele C. Black;Thomas R. Simon;Ileana Arias

Frequent Co-Authors

Martie P. Thompson
Martie P. Thompson Appalachian State University
James A. Mercy
James A. Mercy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Raymond Paternoster
Raymond Paternoster University of Maryland, College Park
Ted Chiricos
Ted Chiricos Florida State University
Kathleen C. Basile
Kathleen C. Basile Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Jacquelyn C. Campbell
Jacquelyn C. Campbell Johns Hopkins University
Ileana Arias
Ileana Arias Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Thomas R. Simon
Thomas R. Simon Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Monica H. Swahn
Monica H. Swahn Kennesaw State University
Ronet Bachman
Ronet Bachman University of Delaware

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in social sciences and humanities opens the door to diverse and rewarding professions, many of which can be accessed conveniently online. Those interested in mental health, education, advocacy, or social change will find an array of flexible academic pathways.

For students looking into counseling, cacrep accredited online masters counseling programs provide rigorous training that meets high professional standards and licensure requirements. If your interests lie in helping families and couples, you may want to explore mft programs that prepare graduates for specialized family therapy practice.

Those seeking broad foundations in human behavior and research may consider a psychology degree online. Many of these programs are flexible and affordable, offering a gateway to careers in mental health, business, or social services.

If social work is your passion, there are msw programs with high acceptance rate available for those seeking to make an impact through community advocacy or clinical roles. Each path offers different opportunities to create positive change in society.

Best Scientists Citing Linda E. Saltzman