World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
9982
World Ranking
8245
National Ranking
3535

Lawrence A. Rowe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Rowe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 116 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lawrence A. Rowe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Rowe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - ACM Fellow For seminal contributions to programming languages, relational database technology, user interfaces and multimedia systems.

Overview

Lawrence A. Rowe is affiliated with FX Palo Alto Laboratory in the United States. Their professional work is connected to this institution, which focuses on advanced research and development in computer science and related areas.

In 1998, Lawrence A. Rowe was recognized as an ACM Fellow. The award citation notes contributions spanning programming languages, relational database technology, user interfaces, and multimedia systems.

There is no detailed record available of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues linked to this researcher. Similarly, no specific book publications are listed for Lawrence A. Rowe.

The main fields of study, subfields, and primary topics of work associated with Lawrence A. Rowe have not been specified in the current data. Without these details, it is not possible to map out their precise areas of technical focus or research themes.

Best Publications

  • The design of POSTGRES

    Michael Stonebraker;Lawrence A. Rowe

  • Comparison of video shot boundary detection techniques

    John S. Boreczky;Lawrence A. Rowe

  • The POSTGRES data model

    Lawrence A. Rowe;Michael Stonebraker

  • The implementation of POSTGRES

    M. Stonebraker;L.A. Rowe;M. Hirohama

  • Multimedia storage servers: a tutorial

    D.J. Gemmell;H.M. Vin;D.D. Kandlur;P. Venkat Rangan

  • Third-generation database system manifesto

    Michael Stonebraker;Lawrence A. Rowe;Bruce G. Lindsay;Jim Gray

  • A Continuous Media Player

    Lawrence A. Rowe;Brian C. Smith

  • Performance of a software MPEG video decoder

    Ketan Patel;Brian C. Smith;Lawrence A. Rowe

  • Algorithms for manipulating compressed images

    B.C. Smith;L.A. Rowe

  • Composable ad-hoc mobile services for universal interaction

    Todd D. Hodes;Randy H. Katz;Edouard Servan-Schreiber;Lawrence Rowe

  • Visual similarity of pen gestures

    A. Chris Long;James A. Landay;Lawrence A. Rowe;Joseph Michiels

  • Cache consistency and concurrency control in a client/server DBMS architecture

    Yongdong Wang;Lawrence A. Rowe

  • Implications for a gesture design tool

    Allan Christian Long;James A. Landay;Lawrence A. Rowe

  • Data abstraction, views and updates in RIGEL

    Lawrence A. Rowe;Kurt A. Shoens

  • Toward a common infrastructure for multimedia-networking middleware

    S. McCanne;E. Brewer;R. Katz;L. Rowe

  • Indexes for user access to large video databases

    Lawrence A. Rowe;John S. Boreczky;Charles A. Eads

  • Distributed hierarchical storage manager for a video-on-demand system

    Craig Federighi;Lawrence A. Rowe

  • Parallel implementation of an MPEG-1 encoder: faster than real time

    Ke Shen;Lawrence A. Rowe;Edward J. Delp

  • MPEG Video in Software: Representation, Transmission, and Playback

    Lawrence A. Rowe;Ketan D. Patel;Brian C. Smith;Kim Liu

  • ACM SIGMM retreat report on future directions in multimedia research

    Lawrence A. Rowe;Ramesh Jain

  • Third-generation database system manifesto

    Michael Stonebraker;Lawrence A. Rowe;Bruce Lindsay;James Gray

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce G. Lindsay
Bruce G. Lindsay IBM (United States)
James A. Landay
James A. Landay Stanford University
Jim Gray
Jim Gray Microsoft (United States)
Philip A. Bernstein
Philip A. Bernstein Microsoft (United States)
Joseph A. Konstan
Joseph A. Konstan University of Minnesota
Michael J. Carey
Michael J. Carey University of California, Irvine
David Hutchison
David Hutchison Lancaster University
Matthias Jarke
Matthias Jarke RWTH Aachen University
Vijay Kumar
Vijay Kumar University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA is just one pathway in the world of technology and innovation. Many students are also exploring related fields through flexible online degree options. For those interested in the practical side of engineering, the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online programs offer an affordable route into this high-demand profession.

Students drawn to the fundamental principles of science may consider earning an online theoretical physics degree, where they can develop advanced analytical and problem-solving skills. Alternatively, the booming tech industry continues to create a strong need for skilled data specialists, making accredited data science programs a smart choice for a future-proof career.

Finally, for students interested in the backbone of modern technology, an online master’s in electrical engineering degree provides advanced expertise for roles in electronics, communications, and energy systems. These related online degrees broaden your career options and ensure you have the flexibility to specialize in your area of interest.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence A. Rowe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles