What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Klaus Rohde spends much of his time researching Ecology, Zoology, Species richness, Monogenea and Interspecific competition.
His Ecology research focuses on Latitudinal gradients in species diversity, Niche, Species diversity, Host and Rapoport's rule.
His studies in Zoology integrate themes in fields like Sister group, Clade, Monophyly, Molecular phylogenetics and Monopisthocotylea.
His Species richness research integrates issues from Range, Abundance, Biological dispersal and Zoogeography.
Klaus Rohde combines subjects such as Taxonomy and Digenea with his study of Monogenea.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Ultrastructure, Anatomy and Amphilinidea in addition to Digenea.
His most cited work include:
- Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause (1186 citations)
- Aspects of the ecology of metazoan ectoparasites of marine fishes (276 citations)
- A Critical Evaluation of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Responsible for Niche Restriction in Parasites (255 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Anatomy, Zoology, Ecology, Ultrastructure and Monogenea.
The various areas that Klaus Rohde examines in his Anatomy study include Cilium and Aspidogastrea.
His Zoology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Sister group, Host and Monophyly.
His work in Species richness, Ecological niche, Species diversity, Ecology and Interspecific competition are all subfields of Ecology research.
His Interspecific competition research includes themes of Intraspecific competition and Competition.
The concepts of his Ultrastructure study are interwoven with issues in Cytoplasm, Cell biology and Turbellaria.
He most often published in these fields:
- Anatomy (35.41%)
- Zoology (33.46%)
- Ecology (31.52%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2000-2016)?
- Ecology (31.52%)
- Ecological niche (5.45%)
- Biodiversity (3.11%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Ecology, Ecological niche, Biodiversity, Zoology and Ecology are his primary areas of study.
His study in Ecology focuses on Interspecific competition, Habitat, Ecosystem, Rapoport's rule and Latitudinal gradients in species diversity.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Aspidogastrea and Morphology.
Within one scientific family, Klaus Rohde focuses on topics pertaining to Ecosystem model under Ecological niche, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Climatology and Species diversity.
His research in Zoology focuses on subjects like Niche, which are connected to Host specificity.
His Ecology research includes elements of Competition and Biogeography.
Between 2000 and 2016, his most popular works were:
- Co‐occurrence of ectoparasites of marine fishes: a null model analysis (154 citations)
- Ecology and biogeography of marine parasites. (107 citations)
- A Paedomorphic Parasite Associated with a Neotenic Amphibian Host: Phylogenetic Evidence Suggests a Revised Systematic Position for Sphyranuridae within Anuran and Turtle Polystomatoineans (54 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His main research concerns Ecology, Zoology, Ecology, Biodiversity and Competition.
Many of his research projects under Ecology are closely connected to Measure and Animal species with Measure and Animal species, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
His biological study focuses on Neoteny.
His Ecology study incorporates themes from Niche, Functional ecology and Latitudinal gradients in species diversity.
His Biodiversity study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Environmental change, Environmental resource management, Disturbance, Alternative stable state and Balance of nature.
His study in Competition is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Interspecific competition, Species distribution, Species diversity, Nestedness and Community.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
