World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
38
Citations
4514
World Ranking
2326
National Ranking
838

Kausik Sarkar publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kausik Sarkar sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 186 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Kausik Sarkar D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kausik Sarkar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kausik Sarkar is affiliated with George Washington University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the field of Engineering, with particular emphasis on Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, and Materials Chemistry. Their work also covers Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes as well as Biomaterials, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to engineering challenges.

Their research topics span several key areas, including:

  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
  • Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
  • Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies

Sarkar has contributed to multiple research papers in prominent venues with a notable volume of publications in:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
  • Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics
  • Soft Matter
  • Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Recent publications exemplify the breadth of their research interests:

  • Modified Bovine Milk Exosomes for Doxorubicin Delivery to Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells (2022), ACS Applied Bio Materials
  • Three-Dimensional Printing: A Catalyst for a Changing Orthopaedic Landscape (2020), JBJS Reviews
  • Inhibition of Human Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation by Low-Intensity Ultrasound Stimulation (2020), Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
  • Echogenic exosomes as ultrasound contrast agents (2020), Nanoscale Advances
  • Material Properties, Dissolution and Time Evolution of PEGylated Lipid-Shelled Microbubbles: Effects of the Polyethylene Glycol Hydrophilic Chain Configurations (2022), Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Sarkar collaborates frequently with a group of coauthors who have contributed significantly to their research outputs. Notable frequent collaborators include:

  • Jenna Osborn
  • Lijie Grace Zhang
  • Anik Tarafder
  • Roozbeh Hassanzadeh Azami
  • Flemming Forsberg

Best Publications

  • 4D printing of polymeric materials for tissue and organ regeneration

    Shida Miao;Nathan Castro;Nathan Castro;Margaret Nowicki;Lang Xia

  • Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation.

    Kausik Sarkar;William T. Shi;Dhiman Chatterjee;Flemming Forsberg

  • A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents.

    Dhiman Chatterjee;Kausik Sarkar

  • Stereolithographic 4D Bioprinting of Multiresponsive Architectures for Neural Engineering.

    Shida Miao;Haitao Cui;Margaret Nowicki;Lang Xia

  • Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: Strain-softening interfacial elasticity model

    Shirshendu Paul;Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar;Dhiman Chatterjee

  • Deformation and breakup of a viscoelastic drop in a Newtonian matrix under steady shear

    Nishith Aggarwal;Kausik Sarkar

  • Front tracking simulation of deformation and buckling instability of a liquid capsule enclosed by an elastic membrane

    Xiaoyi Li;Kausik Sarkar

  • Multifunctional polymersomes for cytosolic delivery of gemcitabine and doxorubicin to cancer cells

    Rahul Nahire;Manas K. Haldar;Shirshendu Paul;Avinash H. Ambre

  • Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

    Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar

  • Boundary element techniques for efficient 2-D and 3-D electrical impedance tomography

    Ramani Duraiswami;Georges L. Chahine;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of encapsulation elasticity on the stability of an encapsulated microbubble.

    Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar;Pankaj Jain

  • Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery

    Shirshendu Paul;Rahul Nahire;Sanku Mallik;Kausik Sarkar

  • Deformation of a two-dimensional drop at non-zero Reynolds number in time-periodic extensional flows: numerical simulation

    Kausik Sarkar;William R. Schowalter

  • Efficient 2D and 3D electrical impedance tomography using dual reciprocity boundary element techniques

    Ramani Duraiswami;Kausik Sarkar;Georges L. Chahine

  • Ultrasound-mediated destruction of contrast microbubbles used for medical imaging and drug delivery

    Dhiman Chatterjee;Pankaj Jain;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of matrix viscoelasticity on viscous and viscoelastic drop deformation in a shear flow

    Nishith Aggarwal;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of inertia on the rheology of a dilute emulsion of drops in shear

    Xiaoyi Li;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effective boundary conditions for Stokes flow over a rough surface

    Kausik Sarkar;Andrea Prosperetti

  • Deformation of a two-dimensional viscoelastic drop at non-zero Reynolds number in time-periodic extensional flows

    Kausik Sarkar;William R. Schowalter

  • On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles.

    Dhiman Chatterjee;Kausik Sarkar;Pankaj Jain;Nathan E. Schreppler

  • Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure

    Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar;Flemming Forsberg

  • Stability analysis of an encapsulated microbubble against gas diffusion

    Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of droplet size and perfluorocarbon boiling point on the frequency dependence of acoustic vaporization threshold.

    Mitra Aliabouzar;Krishna N Kumar;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of viscosity ratio on deformation of a viscoelastic drop in a Newtonian matrix under steady shear

    Swarnajay Mukherjee;Kausik Sarkar

Frequent Co-Authors

Lijie Grace Zhang
Lijie Grace Zhang George Washington University
Andrea Prosperetti
Andrea Prosperetti University of Houston
Kalpana S. Katti
Kalpana S. Katti North Dakota State University
Georges L. Chahine
Georges L. Chahine Dynaflow, Inc.
Ramani Duraiswami
Ramani Duraiswami University of Maryland, College Park
Ajay K. Prasad
Ajay K. Prasad University of Delaware
Giovanni Vozzi
Giovanni Vozzi University of Pisa
Paul K. Dayton
Paul K. Dayton Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Charles Meneveau
Charles Meneveau Johns Hopkins University
John P. Fisher
John P. Fisher University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden the opportunities available to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering students. For example, those interested in leadership roles and behavioral skills might consider pursuing the fastest bcba program. This specialization helps develop expertise in behavior analysis, which is increasingly valued in team and project management within engineering fields.

Additionally, students curious about interdisciplinary work involving communication and human factors can explore speech and language pathology programs. Understanding the slp acceptance rate is crucial when selecting a graduate school, as it indicates the competitiveness of programs. For applicants seeking accessible options, reviewing the easiest slp masters programs to get into can provide a practical starting point.

Cost considerations also play a significant role in career planning. Prospective students should understand the online speech pathology degree costs and fees to make informed decisions about funding their education. Combining knowledge from engineering and allied fields can open diverse career pathways, enhancing employability and job satisfaction.

Best Scientists Citing Kausik Sarkar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles