World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 38 2326 2169 838 739 186 4514

Kausik Sarkar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kausik Sarkar between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kausik Sarkar published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2011. 7 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2011. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kausik Sarkar: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 4
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 3
2002 3
2003 6
2004 7
2005 10
2006 10
2007 5
2008 6
2009 9
2010 8
2011 17
2012 13
2013 9
2014 10
2015 4
2016 12
2017 17
2018 16
2019 17
2020 9
2021 4
2022 10
2023 8
2024 6
2025 6
2026 1
Total 240
Download as CSV

Kausik Sarkar publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kausik Sarkar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 177–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 186 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130 186
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Kausik Sarkar D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kausik Sarkar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130 38
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Kausik Sarkar is affiliated with George Washington University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the field of Engineering, with particular emphasis on Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, and Materials Chemistry. Their work also covers Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes as well as Biomaterials, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to engineering challenges.

Their research topics span several key areas, including:

  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
  • Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
  • Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies

Sarkar has contributed to multiple research papers in prominent venues with a notable volume of publications in:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
  • Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics
  • Soft Matter
  • Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Recent publications exemplify the breadth of their research interests:

  • Modified Bovine Milk Exosomes for Doxorubicin Delivery to Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells (2022), ACS Applied Bio Materials
  • Three-Dimensional Printing: A Catalyst for a Changing Orthopaedic Landscape (2020), JBJS Reviews
  • Inhibition of Human Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation by Low-Intensity Ultrasound Stimulation (2020), Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
  • Echogenic exosomes as ultrasound contrast agents (2020), Nanoscale Advances
  • Material Properties, Dissolution and Time Evolution of PEGylated Lipid-Shelled Microbubbles: Effects of the Polyethylene Glycol Hydrophilic Chain Configurations (2022), Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Sarkar collaborates frequently with a group of coauthors who have contributed significantly to their research outputs. Notable frequent collaborators include:

  • Jenna Osborn
  • Lijie Grace Zhang
  • Anik Tarafder
  • Roozbeh Hassanzadeh Azami
  • Flemming Forsberg

Best Publications

  • 4D printing of polymeric materials for tissue and organ regeneration

    Shida Miao;Nathan Castro;Nathan Castro;Margaret Nowicki;Lang Xia

  • Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation.

    Kausik Sarkar;William T. Shi;Dhiman Chatterjee;Flemming Forsberg

  • A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents.

    Dhiman Chatterjee;Kausik Sarkar

  • Stereolithographic 4D Bioprinting of Multiresponsive Architectures for Neural Engineering.

    Shida Miao;Haitao Cui;Margaret Nowicki;Lang Xia

  • Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: Strain-softening interfacial elasticity model

    Shirshendu Paul;Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar;Dhiman Chatterjee

  • Deformation and breakup of a viscoelastic drop in a Newtonian matrix under steady shear

    Nishith Aggarwal;Kausik Sarkar

  • Front tracking simulation of deformation and buckling instability of a liquid capsule enclosed by an elastic membrane

    Xiaoyi Li;Kausik Sarkar

  • Multifunctional polymersomes for cytosolic delivery of gemcitabine and doxorubicin to cancer cells

    Rahul Nahire;Manas K. Haldar;Shirshendu Paul;Avinash H. Ambre

  • Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

    Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar

  • Boundary element techniques for efficient 2-D and 3-D electrical impedance tomography

    Ramani Duraiswami;Georges L. Chahine;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of encapsulation elasticity on the stability of an encapsulated microbubble.

    Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar;Pankaj Jain

  • Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery

    Shirshendu Paul;Rahul Nahire;Sanku Mallik;Kausik Sarkar

  • Deformation of a two-dimensional drop at non-zero Reynolds number in time-periodic extensional flows: numerical simulation

    Kausik Sarkar;William R. Schowalter

  • Efficient 2D and 3D electrical impedance tomography using dual reciprocity boundary element techniques

    Ramani Duraiswami;Kausik Sarkar;Georges L. Chahine

  • Ultrasound-mediated destruction of contrast microbubbles used for medical imaging and drug delivery

    Dhiman Chatterjee;Pankaj Jain;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of matrix viscoelasticity on viscous and viscoelastic drop deformation in a shear flow

    Nishith Aggarwal;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of inertia on the rheology of a dilute emulsion of drops in shear

    Xiaoyi Li;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effective boundary conditions for Stokes flow over a rough surface

    Kausik Sarkar;Andrea Prosperetti

  • Deformation of a two-dimensional viscoelastic drop at non-zero Reynolds number in time-periodic extensional flows

    Kausik Sarkar;William R. Schowalter

  • On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles.

    Dhiman Chatterjee;Kausik Sarkar;Pankaj Jain;Nathan E. Schreppler

  • Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure

    Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar;Flemming Forsberg

  • Stability analysis of an encapsulated microbubble against gas diffusion

    Amit Katiyar;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of droplet size and perfluorocarbon boiling point on the frequency dependence of acoustic vaporization threshold.

    Mitra Aliabouzar;Krishna N Kumar;Kausik Sarkar

  • Effects of viscosity ratio on deformation of a viscoelastic drop in a Newtonian matrix under steady shear

    Swarnajay Mukherjee;Kausik Sarkar

Frequent Co-Authors

Lijie Grace Zhang
Lijie Grace Zhang George Washington University
Andrea Prosperetti
Andrea Prosperetti University of Houston
Kalpana S. Katti
Kalpana S. Katti North Dakota State University
Georges L. Chahine
Georges L. Chahine Dynaflow, Inc.
Ramani Duraiswami
Ramani Duraiswami University of Maryland, College Park
Ajay K. Prasad
Ajay K. Prasad University of Delaware
Giovanni Vozzi
Giovanni Vozzi University of Pisa
Paul K. Dayton
Paul K. Dayton Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Charles Meneveau
Charles Meneveau Johns Hopkins University
John P. Fisher
John P. Fisher University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden the opportunities available to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering students. For example, those interested in leadership roles and behavioral skills might consider pursuing the fastest bcba program. This specialization helps develop expertise in behavior analysis, which is increasingly valued in team and project management within engineering fields.

Additionally, students curious about interdisciplinary work involving communication and human factors can explore speech and language pathology programs. Understanding the slp acceptance rate is crucial when selecting a graduate school, as it indicates the competitiveness of programs. For applicants seeking accessible options, reviewing the easiest slp masters programs to get into can provide a practical starting point.

Cost considerations also play a significant role in career planning. Prospective students should understand the online speech pathology degree costs and fees to make informed decisions about funding their education. Combining knowledge from engineering and allied fields can open diverse career pathways, enhancing employability and job satisfaction.

Best Scientists Citing Kausik Sarkar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles