World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joseph G. H. Wessels

Joseph G. H. Wessels

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
12240
World Ranking
10366
National Ranking
270

Joseph G. H. Wessels publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph G. H. Wessels sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 131 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Joseph G. H. Wessels D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph G. H. Wessels sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph G. H. Wessels is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their academic profile does not include documented recent publications or awards, but the association with this institution situates them within a well-established European research environment.

No specific records indicate the scientist's research fields, subfields, or main topics of study. Similarly, there is no available data about recent papers, collaborative authors, or trends in publication venues related to their work.

The absence of documented book publications or notable scholarly awards also limits the scope of information on their academic contributions.

This profile reflects the known publicly available data points and does not infer beyond the provided factual details about Joseph G. H. Wessels' professional activities or scientific impact.

Best Publications

  • Hydrophobins: Proteins that Change the Nature of the Fungal Surface

    Joseph G.H. Wessels

  • DEVELOPMENTAL REGULATION OF FUNGAL CELL-WALL FORMATION

    J. G. H. Wessels

  • How a fungus escapes the water to grow into the air

    Han A.B. Wösten;Marie Anne Van Wetter;Luis G. Lugones;Henny C. Van der Mei

  • Tansley Review No. 45 Wall growth, protein excretion and morphogenesis in fungi

    Joseph G. H. Wessels

  • Interfacial self-assembly of a hydrophobin into an amphipathic protein membrane mediates fungal attachment to hydrophobic surfaces.

    H. A. B. Wosten;F. H. J. Schuren;J. G. H. Wessels

  • Interfacial Self-Assembly of a Fungal Hydrophobin into a Hydrophobic Rodlet Layer.

    Han A. B. Wosten;Onno M. H. de Vries;Joseph G. H. Wessels

  • LOCALIZATION OF GROWTH AND SECRETION OF PROTEINS IN ASPERGILLUS-NIGER

    Han A. B. Wösten;Serge M. Moukha;Johannes H. Sietsma;Joseph G. H. Wessels

  • CELL-WALL SYNTHESIS IN APICAL HYPHAL GROWTH

    J.G.H. Wessels

  • Hydrophobin Genes Involved in Formation of Aerial Hyphae and Fruit Bodies in Schizophyllum.

    Joseph G. H. Wessels;Onno M. H. de Vries;Sigridur A. Asgeirsdottir;Frank H. J. Schuren

  • Fungal Cell Walls: A Survey

    J. G. H. Wessels;J. H. Sietsma

  • INSOLUBLE HYDROPHOBIN COMPLEXES IN THE WALLS OF SCHIZOPHYLLUM-COMMUNE AND OTHER FILAMENTOUS FUNGI

    Onno M. H. de Vries;M. Peter Fekkes;Han A. B. Wösten;Joseph G. H. Wessels

  • Structural Characterization of the Hydrophobin SC3, as a Monomer and after Self-Assembly at Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Interfaces

    Marcel L. de Vocht;Karin Scholtmeijer;Eric W. van der Vegte;Onno M.H. de Vries

  • Fungal hydrophobins in medical and technical applications.

    K. Scholtmeijer;J. G. H. Wessels;H. A. B. Wösten

  • Two genes specifically expressed in fruiting dikaryons of Schizophyllum commune: homologies with a gene not regulated by mating-type genes.

    Frank H.J. Schuren;Joseph G.H. Wessels

  • Structural and functional role of the disulfide bridges in the hydrophobin SC3.

    Marcel L. de Vocht;Ilya Reviakine;Han A.B. Wösten;Alain Brisson

  • Hydrophobins, from molecular structure to multiple functions in fungal development

    Han A.B. Wösten;Joseph G.H. Wessels

  • THE FUNGAL HYDROPHOBIN SC3P SELF-ASSEMBLES AT THE SURFACE OF AERIAL HYPHAE AS A PROTEIN MEMBRANE CONSTITUTING THE HYDROPHOBIC RODLET LAYER

    H. A. B. Wösten;S. A. Asgeirsdottir;J. H. Krook;J. H. H. Drenth

  • Chemical and morphological characterization of the hyphal wall surface of the basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune.

    J.G.H. Wessels;D.R. Kreger;R. Marchant;B.A. Regensburg

  • An abundant hydrophobin (ABH1) forms hydrophobic rodlet layers in Agaricus bisporus fruiting bodies.

    L G Lugones;J S Bosscher;K Scholtmeyer;O M H de Vries

  • Surface Modifications Created by Using Engineered Hydrophobins

    Karin Scholtmeijer;Meike I. Janssen;Bertus Gerssen;Marcel L. de Vocht

Frequent Co-Authors

Han A. B. Wösten
Han A. B. Wösten Utrecht University
George T. Robillard
George T. Robillard University of Groningen
Henk J. Busscher
Henk J. Busscher University Medical Center Groningen
Martin C. Harmsen
Martin C. Harmsen University Medical Center Groningen
Marcel Asther
Marcel Asther INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Tapani Yli-Mattila
Tapani Yli-Mattila University of Turku
Henny C. van der Mei
Henny C. van der Mei University of Groningen
Rosmarie Honegger
Rosmarie Honegger University of Zurich
Paul Tudzynski
Paul Tudzynski University of Münster
Georges Hadziioannou
Georges Hadziioannou Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Biology or Biochemistry, there are several online degrees and career pathways you can explore—especially in the rapidly growing field of health information management (HIM). Many students interested in science pursue affordable online him programs to build a strong foundation in healthcare data, medical coding, and electronic health records. These programs can open doors to diverse roles in medical administration and informatics.

For those considering a career in medical coding, understanding the differences between ccs vs cpc certification is essential. Each certification leads to different job functions and salary prospects in the healthcare industry. If you’re curious about compensation, read more on how much does a medical coder make, which highlights average salaries depending on your credentials and experience.

The job outlook for medical billing and coding is promising, with above-average growth driven by the expansion of healthcare services. Online education offers flexible and cost-effective opportunities to enter this dynamic sector, making it an appealing choice for students with a background or interest in life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph G. H. Wessels

Recently Published Articles