World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan Mellon

Jonathan Mellon

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
24
Citations
2796
World Ranking
1690
National Ranking
849

Jonathan Mellon publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Mellon sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 105 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Jonathan Mellon D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Mellon sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 24 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: Political attitudes and demographics of British social media users:

    Jonathan Mellon;Christopher Prosser

  • Internet Search Data and Issue Salience: The Properties of Google Trends as a Measure of Issue Salience

    Jonathan Mellon

  • Electoral Shocks: The Volatile Voter in a Turbulent World

    Edward Fieldhouse;Jane Green;Geoffrey Evans;Jonathan Mellon

  • Working class votes and Conservative losses: solving the UKIP puzzle

    Geoffrey Evans;Jon Mellon

  • Immigration, Euroscepticism, and the rise and fall of UKIP:

    Geoffrey Evans;Jonathan Mellon

  • The Effect of Bureaucratic Responsiveness on Citizen Participation

    Fredrik M. Sjoberg;Jonathan Mellon;Tiago Peixoto

  • Where and When Can We Use Google Trends to Measure Issue Salience

    Jonathan Mellon

  • Brexit or Corbyn?: Campaign and Inter-Election Vote Switching in the 2017 UK General Election

    Jonathan Mellon;Geoffrey Evans;Edward Fieldhouse;Jane Green

  • Effects of the internet on participation : study of a public policy referendum in Brazil

    Paolo Spada;Jonathan Mellon;Tiago Carneiro Peixoto;Fredrik Matias Sjoberg

  • Electoral Shocks

    Unknown

  • The Twilight of the Polls? A Review of Trends in Polling Accuracy and the Causes of Polling Misses

    Christopher Prosser;Jonathan Mellon

  • Do AIs know what the most important issue is? Using language models to code open-text social survey responses at scale

    Unknown

  • A Get-Out-the-Vote Experiment on the World’s Largest Participatory Budgeting Vote in Brazil

    Tiago Peixoto;Fredrik M Sjoberg;Jonathan Mellon

  • Missing Nonvoters and Misweighted Samples: Explaining the 2015 Great British Polling Miss

    Jonathan Mellon;Christopher Prosser

  • The skills premium and the ethnic premium: a cross-national experiment on European attitudes to immigrants

    Robert Ford;Jonathan Mellon

  • Tremors but no Youthquake: Measuring changes in the age and turnout gradients at the 2015 and 2017 British General Elections

    Christopher Prosser;Edward Fieldhouse;Jane Green;Jonathan Mellon

  • Social Class: Identity, awareness and political attitudes: why are we still working class?

    Geoffrey Evans;Jonathan Mellon

  • The puzzle of high political partisanship among ethnic minority young people in Great Britain

    Nicole Martin;Jonathan Mellon

  • Brexit or Corbyn? Campaign and Inter-Election Vote Switching in the 2017 UK General Election

    Jonathan Mellon;Geoffrey Evans;Edward A. Fieldhouse;Jane Green

  • Do Mobile Phone Surveys Work in Poor Countries

    Benjamin Leo;Benjamin Leo;Robert Morello;Jonathan Mellon;Tiago Peixoto

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey M. Evans
Geoffrey M. Evans University of Newcastle Australia
Edward Fieldhouse
Edward Fieldhouse University of Manchester
John Curtice
John Curtice University of Strathclyde
Robert Ford
Robert Ford University of Manchester
Holli A. Semetko
Holli A. Semetko Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Mellon

Recently Published Articles