World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
72
Citations
17541
World Ranking
2313
National Ranking
1096

John F. Marshall publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Marshall sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John F. Marshall D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Marshall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1956 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1931 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

John F. Marshall is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Oncology, Immunology, Molecular Biology, Immunology and Allergy, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work centers on key topics such as Cell Adhesion Molecules Research, CAR-T cell therapy research, Immunotherapy and Immune Responses, Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, Cancer Cells and Metastasis, Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation, and Virus-based gene therapy research.

John F. Marshall has contributed to several recent papers including:

  • Epidermolysis bullosa, 2020, published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Disruption of pancreatic stellate cell myofibroblast phenotype promotes pancreatic tumor invasion, 2022, published in Cell Reports
  • CEACAM7 Is an Effective Target for CAR T-cell Therapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, 2021, published in Clinical Cancer Research
  • Integrin αvβ6-specific therapy for pancreatic cancer developed from foot-and-mouth-disease virus, 2020, published in Theranostics
  • Current Perspectives on the Use of off the Shelf CAR-T/NK Cells for the Treatment of Cancer, 2021, published in Cancers

The scientist frequently publishes in journals such as Pancreatology, Cancers, npj Breast Cancer, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Cancer Research.

John F. Marshall has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including Lauren C. Cutmore, Nicholas F. Brown, Elizabeth Murray, Deepak B. Thimiri Govinda Raj, and Edward Carter.

The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) with awards received in 1931, 1956, and 2005.

Best Publications

  • Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation.

    L. Weiskrantz;Elizabeth K. Warrington;M. D. Sanders;J. Marshall

  • Further analysis of sensory inattention following lateral hypothalamic damage in rats.

    John F. Marshall;Philip Teitelbaum

  • Molecular substrates for retrieval and reconsolidation of cocaine-associated contextual memory.

    Courtney A. Miller;John F. Marshall

  • Sensory Neglect Produced by Lateral Hypothalamic Damage

    John F. Marshall;Blair H. Turner;Philip Teitelbaum

  • Fos protein expression and cocaine-seeking behavior in rats after exposure to a cocaine self-administration environment

    Janet L. Neisewander;David A. Baker;Rita A. Fuchs;Ly T. L. Tran-Nguyen

  • Somatosensory inattention after dopamine-depleting intracerebral 6-OHDA injections: spontaneous recovery and pharmacological control.

    John F. Marshall

  • Movement disorders of aged rats: reversal by dopamine receptor stimulation

    John F. Marshall;Norberto Berrios

  • Striatal Fos expression is indicative of dopamine D1/D2 synergism and receptor supersensitivity

    Gerald J. Lahoste;Jen Yu;John F. Marshall

  • Multiple methamphetamine injections induce marked increases in extracellular striatal dopamine which correlate with subsequent neurotoxicity.

    Steven J. O'Dell;Fredric B. Weihmuller;John F. Marshall

  • The mesolimbic dopamine system: From motivation to action

    Unknown

  • Time Course of Adaptations in Dopamine Biosynthesis, Metabolism, and Release Following Nigrostriatal Lesions: Implications for Behavioral Recovery from Brain Injury

    Altar Ca;Marien Mr;Marshall Jf

  • Neostriatal dopamine and sensory inattention.

    John F. Marshall;Norberto Berrios;Steven Sawyer

  • Neurotoxic methamphetamine regimen severely impairs recognition memory in rats

    Nadja Schröder;Steven J. O'Dell;John F. Marshall

  • Striatal metabolic rate and clinical response to neuroleptics in schizophrenia

    Monte S. Buchsbaum;Steven G. Potkin;Benjamin V. Siegel;James Lohr

  • Activation-induced restoration of sensorimotor functions in rats with dopamine-depleting brain lesions.

    John F. Marshall;Deborah Levitan;Edward M. Stricker

  • Supersensitivity to apomorphine following destruction of the ascending dopamine neurons: quantification using the rotational model.

    Unknown

  • Sensory inattention in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced degeneration of ascending dopaminergic neurons: apomorphine-induced reversal of deficits.

    John F. Marshall;John F. Marshall;Terry Gotthelf;Terry Gotthelf

  • Quantitative autoradiography of dopamine D2 sites in rat caudate-putamen: Localization to intrinsic neurons and not to neocortical afferents

    J.N. Joyce;J.F. Marshall

  • Dopamine high-affinity transport site topography in rat brain: major differences between dorsal and ventral striatum.

    J.F. Marshall;S.J. O'Dell;R. Navarrete;A.J. Rosenstein

  • Damage to dopamine systems differs between parkinson's disease and alzheimer's disease with parkinsonism

    Angela M. Murray;Fredric B. Weihmueller;John F. Marshall;Howard I. Hurtig

  • Striatal Efferent Fibers Play a Role in Maintaining Rotational Behavior in the Rat

    John F. Marshall;Urban Ungerstedt

  • Methamphetamine neurotoxicity: Dissociation of striatal dopamine terminal damage from parietal cortical cell body injury

    Amelia J. Eisch;Amelia J. Eisch;John F. Marshall

Frequent Co-Authors

Kim A. Neve
Kim A. Neve Oregon Health & Science University
Amelia J. Eisch
Amelia J. Eisch University of Pennsylvania
Carl W. Cotman
Carl W. Cotman University of California, Irvine
Steven G. Potkin
Steven G. Potkin University of California, Irvine
Rachael L. Neve
Rachael L. Neve Harvard University
William E. Bunney
William E. Bunney University of California, Irvine
David Baker
David Baker University of Washington
Michael Leon
Michael Leon University of California, Irvine
Monte S. Buchsbaum
Monte S. Buchsbaum University of California, San Diego
Janet L. Neisewander
Janet L. Neisewander Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John F. Marshall

Recently Published Articles