World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Johann Greilhuber

Johann Greilhuber

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
12983
World Ranking
16006
National Ranking
146

Johann Greilhuber publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johann Greilhuber sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 114 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Johann Greilhuber D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johann Greilhuber sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johann Greilhuber is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria. The research work primarily spans several interdisciplinary fields, including Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Decision Sciences, and Computer Science.

The scientist's research encompasses a range of specialized subfields, notably:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

Main topics of work reflect an emphasis on strategic and mathematical aspects of decision making and analysis, with contributions focused on:

  • Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Game Theory and Applications
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research

Collaborative efforts include joint work with several frequent coauthors, illustrating interdisciplinary cooperation. These coauthors are:

  • Sophia Schober
  • Enrico Iurlano
  • Günther R. Raidl

Though there is no detailed list of recent papers or specific publication venues, the range of fields and subfields indicates an engagement with diverse academic communities across economics, decision sciences, and computer science disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry.

    Jaroslav Dole zcaron;Johann Greilhuber;Jan Suda;Jan Suda

  • Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human.

    Dolezel J;Bartos J;Voglmayr H;Greilhuber J

  • The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents

    Johann Greilhuber;Jaroslav Doležel;Martin A. Lysák;Michael D. Bennett

  • Plant Genome Size Estimation by Flow Cytometry: Inter-laboratory Comparison

    J. Doležel;J. Greilhuber;S. Lucretti;A. Meister

  • Eukaryotic genome size databases

    T. Ryan Gregory;James A. Nicol;Heidi Tamm;Bellis Kullman

  • Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size in Angiosperms: Identifying its Existence

    Johann Greilhuber

  • Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size: A Critical Reassessment

    J. Greilhuber

  • Flow Cytometry with Plant Cells

    Jaroslav Doleel;Johann Greilhuber;Jan Suda

  • Smallest angiosperm genomes found in lentibulariaceae, with chromosomes of bacterial size.

    J. Greilhuber;T. Borsch;K. Müller;A. Worberg

  • C-banded karyotypes in theScilla hohenackeri group,S. persica, andPuschkinia (Liliaceae)

    Johann Greilhuber;Franz Speta

  • Genome size variation in Pisum sativum.

    J. Greilhuber;I. Ebert

  • Nuclear DNA Content Measurement

    Johann Greilhuber;Eva M. Temsch;João C. M. Loureiro

  • Flow cytometry with plant cells : analysis of genes, chromosomes and genomes

    Jaroslav Doležel;Johann Greilhuber;Jan Suda

  • Analysis of nuclear DNA content in Capsicum (Solanaceae) by flow cytometry and Feulgen densitometry.

    Eduardo A. Moscone;Monika Baranyi;Irma Ebert;Johann Greilhuber

  • Self-tanning ― a new and important source of stoichiometric error in cytophotometric determination of nuclear DNA content in plants

    Johann Greilhuber

  • Nuclear genome size: are we getting closer?

    Jaroslav Dolezel;Johann Greilhuber

  • Characterization of heterochromatin in different species of the Scilla siberica group (Liliaceae) by in situ hybridization of satellite DNAs and fluorochrome banding

    Barbara Deumling;Johann Greilhuber

  • Patterns, sources and ecological implications of clonal diversity in apomictic Ranunculus carpaticola (Ranunculus auricomus complex, Ranunculaceae).

    O. Paun;J. Greilhuber;E. M. Temsch;E. Hörandl

  • Evolution of genome size and chromosome number in the carnivorous plant genus Genlisea (Lentibulariaceae), with a new estimate of the minimum genome size in angiosperms.

    Andreas Fleischmann;Todd P. Michael;Fernando Rivadavia;Aretuza Sousa

  • Flow Cytometry with Plants: An Overview

    Jaroslav Doležel;Johann Greilhuber;Jan Suda;Jan Suda

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Suda
Jan Suda Charles University
Jaroslav Doležel
Jaroslav Doležel Czech Academy of Sciences
Elvira Hörandl
Elvira Hörandl University of Göttingen
Ilia J. Leitch
Ilia J. Leitch Royal Botanic Gardens
Hermann Voglmayr
Hermann Voglmayr University of Vienna
Friedrich Ehrendorfer
Friedrich Ehrendorfer University of Vienna
Boris Vyskot
Boris Vyskot Czech Academy of Sciences
Martin A. Lysak
Martin A. Lysak Masaryk University
Jonathan F. Wendel
Jonathan F. Wendel Iowa State University
Michael D. Bennett
Michael D. Bennett Royal Botanic Gardens

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and evolving career pathways, especially in healthcare and life sciences. For those seeking to enter the nutrition field, consider exploring a fast track nutrition degree. These accelerated programs enable you to build expertise quickly and start making an impact on public health sooner.

Professionals aiming for managerial roles can boost their credentials with an mba healthcare management online. This opens up leadership opportunities in hospitals, research centers, and biotech companies by focusing on the business side of health and science organizations.

Another pathway is medical coding—a vital support profession in healthcare. If you’re considering certification, it's important to understand the differences and career benefits by comparing certified coding specialist credentials. Interested in the financial prospects of this role? Find out what is medical coding salary and prepare for a rewarding career supporting clinical and research institutions.

Best Scientists Citing Johann Greilhuber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles