What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Wetland
Ecology, Macrophyte, Eutrophication, Zooplankton and Nutrient are his primary areas of study.
Ecology is a component of his Biomass, Phytoplankton, Daphnia, Biomanipulation and Phoslock studies.
His Macrophyte study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Ecology and Functional ecology.
Jens Peder Jensen interconnects Seasonality, Waves and shallow water, Inlet and Animal science in the investigation of issues within Eutrophication.
As a part of the same scientific study, Jens Peder Jensen usually deals with the Zooplankton, concentrating on Pelagic zone and frequently concerns with Trophic cascade and Lake ecosystem.
In his study, Arctic is strongly linked to Temperate climate, which falls under the umbrella field of Nutrient.
His most cited work include:
- Role of sediment and internal loading of phosphorus in shallow lakes (1015 citations)
- Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading - an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies (858 citations)
- Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: changes along a phosphorus gradient (718 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ecology, Zooplankton, Eutrophication, Macrophyte and Phytoplankton.
His Ecology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Animal science and Chlorophyll a.
His Zooplankton research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Catch per unit effort, Pelagic zone and Grazing.
His studies in Eutrophication integrate themes in fields like Drainage basin, Inlet and Fish kill.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Water quality, Biomanipulation and Hypolimnion in addition to Macrophyte.
His work deals with themes such as Biomass, Grazing pressure and Plankton, which intersect with Phytoplankton.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (60.78%)
- Zooplankton (41.18%)
- Eutrophication (37.25%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2003-2009)?
- Ecology (60.78%)
- Drainage basin (17.65%)
- Trend analysis (11.76%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Ecology, Drainage basin, Trend analysis, Apportionment and Eutrophication.
When carried out as part of a general Ecology research project, his work on Nutrient and Temperate climate is frequently linked to work in Danish, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
His study looks at the relationship between Nutrient and topics such as Animal science, which overlap with Stratification and Seasonality.
The various areas that Jens Peder Jensen examines in his Eutrophication study include Macrophyte, Phytoplankton, Zooplankton, Biomass and Fish kill.
His research in Phytoplankton intersects with topics in Daphnia and Plankton.
His Plankton study combines topics in areas such as Dominance, Catch per unit effort, Rutilus and Perch.
Between 2003 and 2009, his most popular works were:
- Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading - an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies (858 citations)
- Shallow lake restoration by nutrient loading reduction—some recent findings and challenges ahead (249 citations)
- Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes (202 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Wetland
Jens Peder Jensen mostly deals with Macrophyte, Eutrophication, Ecology, Zooplankton and Biomass.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Nutrient, Periphyton, Water Framework Directive, Species richness and Daphnia.
His Nutrient research includes themes of Temperate climate and Chlorophyll a.
His research links Algal bloom with Daphnia.
Jens Peder Jensen integrates many fields, such as Ecology and Latitude, in his works.
Zooplankton and Phytoplankton are commonly linked in his work.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
