World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
39
Citations
19388
World Ranking
2341
National Ranking
1326

Jay Shanken publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay Shanken sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 74 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Jay Shanken D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay Shanken sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay Shanken is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their professional work is rooted in academic research and science, though specific details regarding their areas of study, publications, and collaborations remain limited in accessible records.

There are no recent papers listed under Jay Shanken's name. Likewise, no frequent co-authors or frequent publication venues have been documented, which provides no direct insight into their collaborative networks or preferred journals and conferences.

Information related to their main and subfields of study has not been specified, so the precise domains or disciplines to which Jay Shanken contributes are not publicly noted.

Similarly, no data on main topics of work is available, leaving the thematic focus of their research unrecorded. There is also no listing of book publications connected to their name.

There are no recorded awards or recognitions associated with Jay Shanken, which means there is no information about honors or distinctions received during their career.

Given the limited data, Jay Shanken's professional profile is primarily characterized by affiliation details without comprehensive evidence of research output, collaboration, or academic contributions in databases reviewed here.

Best Publications

  • A TEST OF THE EFFICIENCY OF A GIVEN PORTFOLIO

    Michael R. Gibbons;Stephen A. Ross;Jay Shanken

  • On the Estimation of Beta-Pricing Models

    Jay Shanken

  • Another Look at the Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns

    S. P. Kothari;Jay Shanken;Richard G. Sloan

  • A skeptical appraisal of asset pricing tests.

    Jonathan Lewellen;Stefan Nagel;Jay Shanken

  • Book-to-market, dividend yield, and expected market returns: A time-series analysis

    S.P. Kothari;Jay Shanken

  • Lack of timeliness and noise as explanations for the low contemporaneuos return-earnings association

    Daniel W. Collins;S.P. Kothari;Jay Shanken;Richard G. Sloan

  • Intertemporal asset pricing: An Empirical Investigation

    Jay Shanken

  • Multivariate tests of the zero-beta CAPM

    Jay Shanken

  • Problems in measuring portfolio performance An application to contrarian investment strategies

    Ray Ball;S.P. Kothari;Jay Shanken

  • Comparing Asset Pricing Models

    Francisco Barillas;Jay Shanken

  • Learning, Asset-Pricing Tests, and Market Efficiency

    Jonathan Lewellen;Jay Shanken

  • The Arbitrage Pricing Theory: Is it Testable?

    Jay Shanken

  • Estimating and Testing Beta Pricing Models: Alternative Methods and their Performance in Simulations

    Jay Shanken;Guofu Zhou

  • Pricing Model Performance and the Two-Pass Cross-Sectional Regression Methodology

    Raymond Kan;Cesare Robotti;Jay Shanken

  • Estimating and testing beta pricing models: Alternative methods and their performance in simulations.

    Jay Shanken;Guofu Zhou

  • Which Alpha?

    Unknown

  • A Skeptical Appraisal of Asset Pricing Tests

    Jonathan Lewellen;Jonathan Lewellen;Stefan Nagel;Jay A. Shanken;Jay A. Shanken

  • Multivariate proxies and asset pricing relations

    Jay Shanken

  • Economic forces and the stock market revisited

    Jay Shanken;Mark I. Weinstein

  • Multi‐Beta CAPM or Equilibrium‐APT?: A Reply

    Jay Shanken

  • Stock return variation and expected dividends

    S.P. Kothari;Jay Shanken

  • Another Look at the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns

    Jay A. Shanken;Jay A. Shanken;Richard G. Sloan

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Sloan
Richard G. Sloan University of Southern California
Guofu Zhou
Guofu Zhou Washington University in St. Louis
Stefan Nagel
Stefan Nagel University of Chicago
Daniel W. Collins
Daniel W. Collins University of Iowa
Tarun Chordia
Tarun Chordia Emory University
Amit Goyal
Amit Goyal University of Lausanne
David S. Scharfstein
David S. Scharfstein Harvard University
Henri Servaes
Henri Servaes London Business School
Andrei Shleifer
Andrei Shleifer Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online programs can offer flexible and efficient routes into Economics and Finance careers. For those aiming to quickly enter the workforce or advance their qualifications, an accelerated finance degree can provide an intensive curriculum that may be completed in less time than traditional programs. These fast-paced degrees focus on key topics such as investment analysis, portfolio management, and financial markets.

Ambitious professionals might also consider a fast track mba 6 months online program. These MBAs are designed for experienced learners seeking management roles in a condensed timeframe, offering advanced business strategy and leadership training.

For those interested in the foundational aspects of financial operations, earning a bookkeeping course certificate delivers practical skills in managing accounts and ledgers. Meanwhile, an office administration degree is ideal for those looking to support financial departments or manage administrative functions.

Best Scientists Citing Jay Shanken

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles