World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
24
Citations
2582
World Ranking
1701
National Ranking
1

Jason Gainous publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason Gainous sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 97 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Jason Gainous D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason Gainous sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 24 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics

    Jason Gainous;Kevin M. Wagner

  • Core Values, Value Conflict, and Citizens' Ambivalence about Gay Rights

    Stephen C. Craig;Michael D. Martinez;James G. Kane;Jason Gainous

  • Winners, Losers, and Election Context: Voter Responses to the 2000 Presidential Election

    Stephen C. Craig;Michael D. Martinez;Jason Gainous;James G. Kane

  • Civic education and democratic capacity : how do teachers teach and what works?

    Allison M. Martens;Jason Gainous

  • The Effectiveness of Civic Education Are “Good” Teachers Actually Good for “All” Students?

    Jason Gainous;Allison M. Martens

  • Gender and the Digital Divide in Latin America

    Tricia J. Gray;Jason Gainous;Kevin M. Wagner

  • Tweeting to Power

    Unknown

  • Issue-Related Learning in a Gubernatorial Campaign: A Panel Study

    Stephen C. Craig;James G. Kane;Jason Gainous

  • Electronic Grassroots: Does Online Campaigning Work?

    Kevin M. Wagner;Jason Gainous

  • Digital uprising : the Internet revolution in the Middle East.

    Kevin M. Wagner;Jason Gainous

  • Traditional Cleavages or a New World: Does Online Social Networking Bridge the Political Participation Divide?

    Jason Gainous;Adam David Marlowe;Kevin M. Wagner

  • I Am Woman, Hear Me Tweet! Gender Differences in Twitter Use among Congressional Candidates

    Kevin M. Wagner;Jason Gainous;Mirya R. Holman

  • Why Does Voting Get So Complicated? A Review of Theories for Analyzing Democratic Participation

    Jeff Gill;Jason Gainous

  • Civic disobedience : does Internet use stimulate political unrest in East-Asia?

    Jason Gainous;Kevin M. Wagner;Jason P. Abbott

  • Digital media and political opposition in authoritarian systems: Russia’s 2011 and 2016 Duma elections

    Jason Gainous;Kevin M. Wagner;Charles E. Ziegler

  • Internet freedom and social media effects: democracy and citizen attitudes in Latin America

    Jason Gainous;Kevin Wagner;Tricia Gray

  • Social Welfare Attitudes and Ambivalence about the Role of Government

    Jason Gainous;Stephen C. Craig;Michael D. Martinez

  • Critical social media information flows: political trust and protest behaviour among Kazakhstani college students

    Amanzhol Bekmagambetov;Kevin M. Wagner;Jason Gainous;Zhaxylyk Sabitov

  • Is the equalization/normalization lens dead? Social media campaigning in US congressional elections

    Jason Gainous;Andrew Segal;Kevin Wagner

  • Traditional Versus Internet Media in a Restricted Information Environment: How Trust in the Medium Matters

    Jason Gainous;Jason P. Abbott;Kevin M. Wagner

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen C. Craig
Stephen C. Craig University of Florida
Mirya R. Holman
Mirya R. Holman University of Houston
Wesley O. Johnson
Wesley O. Johnson University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jason Gainous

Recently Published Articles