World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
6076
World Ranking
8290
National Ranking
4429

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
6149
World Ranking
8110
National Ranking
3479

James C. Eliassen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Eliassen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 96 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James C. Eliassen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Eliassen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James C. Eliassen is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and psychology, with specific expertise in cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The scientist has contributed to studies involving functional brain connectivity, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, anxiety and depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, advanced MRI techniques, and neural dynamics and brain function.

Eliassen's publication record shows frequent contributions to prominent venues such as Frontiers in Neuroinformatics and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Among their recent papers are:

  • FMRI study of implicit emotional face processing in patients with MDD with melancholic subtype (2023) published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Functional MRI study of feedback-based reinforcement learning in depression (2022) published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
  • Corrigendum: Functional MRI study of feedback-based reinforcement learning in depression (2023) published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Eliassen's research activities. Frequent co-authors include Almira Kustubayeva, Erik Nelson, Jane B. Allendorfer, Gerald Matthews, and Michael L. Smith. These collaborations highlight a consistent network of researchers contributing across multiple studies.

The fields of study that encapsulate Eliassen's work are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

The subfields involved in Eliassen's research encompass:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Main research topics explored include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Best Publications

  • An Event-Related fMRI Investigation of Implicit Semantic Priming

    Jesse Rissman;James C. Eliassen;Sheila E. Blumstein

  • Neuroimaging evidence for the emotional potency of odor-evoked memory

    Rachel S Herz;James Eliassen;Sophia Beland;Timothy Souza

  • Dissociation of Spatial and Temporal Coupling in the Bimanual Movements of Callosotomy Patients

    Elizabeth A. Franz;James C. Eliassen;Richard B. Ivry;Michael S. Gazzaniga

  • Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation increases prefrontal cortex activation during sustained attention in healthy boys: a placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Robert K McNamara;Jessica Able;Ronald Jandacek;Therese Rider

  • Cortical Plasticity Following Motor Skill Learning During Mental Practice in Stroke

    Stephen J. Page;Jerzy P. Szaflarski;James C. Eliassen;Hai Pan

  • Abnormal FMRI brain activation in euthymic bipolar disorder patients during a counting Stroop interference task.

    Stephen M. Strakowski;Caleb M. Adler;Scott K. Holland;Neil P. Mills

  • Frontal and Parietal Lobe Activation during Transitive Inference in Humans

    Bettina D. Acuna;James C. Eliassen;John P. Donoghue;Jerome N. Sanes

  • Inferior Frontal Regions Underlie the Perception of Phonetic Category Invariance

    Emily B. Myers;Sheila E. Blumstein;Edward Walsh;James Eliassen

  • Placebo effect of medication cost in Parkinson disease A randomized double-blind study

    Alberto J. Espay;Matthew M. Norris;James C. Eliassen;Alok Dwivedi

  • Identification and molecular cloning of a neuropeptide Y homolog that produces prolonged inhibition in Aplysia neurons.

    Sanjay M. Rajpara;Pablo D. Garcia;Radclyffe Roberts;James C. Eliassen

  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Activation in Bipolar Mania: Evidence for Disruption of the Ventrolateral Prefrontal-Amygdala Emotional Pathway

    Stephen M. Strakowski;James C. Eliassen;Martine Lamy;Michael A. Cerullo

  • Anterior and posterior callosal contributions to simultaneous bimanual movements of the hands and fingers.

    James C. Eliassen;Kathleen Baynes;Michael S. Gazzaniga

  • Enhanced neural activation with blueberry supplementation in mild cognitive impairment

    Erin L. Boespflug;James C. Eliassen;Jonathan A. Dudley;Marcelle D. Shidler

  • A longitudinal functional connectivity analysis of the amygdala in bipolar I disorder across mood states.

    Michael A Cerullo;David E Fleck;James C Eliassen;Matt S Smith

  • Neuroanatomic abnormalities in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder: a voxel-based morphometry study.

    Jeffrey R. Strawn;M B S Anna Wehry;Wen-Jang Chu;Caleb M. Adler

  • Direction information coordinated via the posterior third of the corpus callosum during bimanual movements.

    James C. Eliassen;Kathleen Baynes;Michael S. Gazzaniga

  • NEUROCIRCUITRY OF GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER IN ADOLESCENTS: A PILOT FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING AND FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY STUDY

    Jeffrey R. Strawn;Jeffrey R. Strawn;M B S Samantha Bitter;Wade A. Weber;Wen-Jang Chu

  • Brain-Mapping Techniques for Evaluating Poststroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Review

    James C. Eliassen;Erin L. Boespflug;Martine Lamy;Jane Allendorfer

  • Human brain activation accompanying explicitly directed movement sequence learning.

    James C. Eliassen;Timothy Souza;Jerome N. Sanes

  • Experience-dependent activation patterns in human brain during visual-motor associative learning

    James C. Eliassen;Timothy Souza;Jerome N. Sanes

  • Collaboration between the hemispheres of a callosotomy patient Emerging right hemisphere speech and the left hemisphere interpreter

    M S Gazzaniga;J C Eliassen;L Nisenson;C M Wessinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Strakowski
Stephen M. Strakowski The University of Texas at Austin
Caleb M. Adler
Caleb M. Adler University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Melissa P. DelBello
Melissa P. DelBello University of Cincinnati
Jerzy P. Szaflarski
Jerzy P. Szaflarski University of Alabama at Birmingham
Michael S. Gazzaniga
Michael S. Gazzaniga University of California, Santa Barbara
Jane B. Allendorfer
Jane B. Allendorfer University of Alabama School of Medicine
Jerome N. Sanes
Jerome N. Sanes Brown University
Robert K. McNamara
Robert K. McNamara University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Paula K. Shear
Paula K. Shear University of Cincinnati
Scott K. Holland
Scott K. Holland Medpace (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to related fields such as psychology, social work, and therapy. Many students consider online programs for their flexibility, affordability, and accessibility to quality education.

For those interested in mental health, careers in therapy are in high demand. If you are looking to specialize, check out some of the best online mft programs, which focus on family and marriage therapy.

If you’re considering graduate school, you may wonder, how much does masters in psychology cost? Tuition varies by institution, but with the growth of online options, affordable programs are now easier to find.

Alternatively, if you’re seeking a more general approach, a cheap psychology degree online can offer valuable preparation for multiple career pathways, including research, counseling, and education.

For those looking toward social work, there are now msw online degree options that are both accessible and easier to get into, making it convenient for working professionals to advance their careers in social services or clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing James C. Eliassen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles