World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
15853
World Ranking
3244
National Ranking
1505

Caleb M. Adler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caleb M. Adler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 194 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Caleb M. Adler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caleb M. Adler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Caleb M. Adler is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with significant contributions to psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and pharmacology.

The scientist's work centers around several key topics within these fields. These include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies, Treatment of Major Depression, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare.

Caleb M. Adler has published extensively, including numerous articles in reputable venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Selected recent papers exemplify the focus and scope of their research:

  • Changes in the brain structural connectome after a prospective randomized clinical trial of lithium and quetiapine treatment in youth with bipolar disorder, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial of Lithium Versus Quetiapine for the Treatment of Acute Mania in Youth with Early Course Bipolar Disorder, 2021, Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
  • Effects of short-term quetiapine and lithium therapy for acute manic or mixed episodes on the limbic system and emotion regulation circuitry in youth with bipolar disorder, 2022, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Pretreatment Alterations and Acute Medication Treatment Effects on Brain Task-Related Functional Connectivity in Youth With Bipolar Disorder: A Neuroimaging Randomized Clinical Trial, 2022, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Individual prediction of symptomatic converters in youth offspring of bipolar parents using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 2020, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their research efforts, involving multiple frequent coauthors, such as:

  • Melissa P. DelBello
  • David E. Fleck
  • L. Rodrigo Patino
  • Maxwell J. Tallman
  • Jeffrey A. Welge

The research endeavours encompass clinical trials, neuroimaging studies, and investigations into the pharmacological treatment of mood disorders, particularly among youth populations. This body of work contributes data on brain connectivity changes and medication effects in psychiatric conditions, reflecting interdisciplinary approaches combining psychiatry, neuroscience, and imaging techniques.

Best Publications

  • The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a review of neuroimaging findings.

    Stephen Strakowski;M. P. DelBello;C. M. Adler

  • The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a consensus model.

    Stephen M Strakowski;Caleb M Adler;Jorge Almeida;Lori L Altshuler

  • Decreased brain volume in adults with childhood lead exposure.

    Kim M Cecil;Christopher J Brubaker;Caleb M Adler;Kim N Dietrich;Kim N Dietrich

  • Ventricular and periventricular structural volumes in first- versus multiple-episode bipolar disorder.

    Stephen M. Strakowski;Melissa P. DelBello;Molly E. Zimmerman;Glen E. Getz

  • fMRI of neuronal activation with symptom provocation in unmedicated patients with obsessive compulsive disorder

    Caleb M Adler;Patricia McDonough-Ryan;Kenji W Sax;Scott K Holland

  • Comparison of Ketamine-Induced Thought Disorder in Healthy Volunteers and Thought Disorder in Schizophrenia

    Caleb M. Adler;Anil K. Malhotra;Igor Elman;Terry Goldberg

  • Twelve-month outcome of adolescents with bipolar disorder following first hospitalization for a manic or mixed episode

    Melissa P. DelBello;Dennis Hanseman;Caleb M. Adler;David E. Fleck

  • Neuroimaging in bipolar disorder

    Stephen M Strakowski;Melissa P DelBello;Caleb Adler;Kim M Cecil

  • Effects of Ketamine on Thought Disorder, Working Memory, and Semantic Memory in Healthy Volunteers

    Caleb M. Adler;Terry E. Goldberg;Anil K. Malhotra;David Pickar

  • Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Elderly Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression-TRANSFORM-3.

    Rachel Ochs-Ross;Ella J. Daly;Yun Zhang;Rosanne Lane

  • Clozapine and risperidone in chronic schizophrenia: Effects on symptoms, Parkinsonian side effects, and neuroendocrine response

    Alan F. Breier;Alan F. Breier;Anil K. Malhotra;Tung Ping Su;Debra A. Pinals

  • A Preliminary fMRI Study of Sustained Attention in Euthymic, Unmedicated Bipolar Disorder

    Stephen M Strakowski;Caleb M Adler;Scott K Holland;Neil Mills

  • Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation increases prefrontal cortex activation during sustained attention in healthy boys: a placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Robert K McNamara;Jessica Able;Ronald Jandacek;Therese Rider

  • Clozapine Blunts N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Antagonist-Induced Psychosis: A Study with Ketamine

    Anil K Malhotra;Caleb M Adler;Sasha D Kennison;Igor Elman

  • Voxel-Based Study of Structural Changes in First-Episode Patients with Bipolar Disorder

    Caleb M. Adler;Melissa P. DelBello;Kelly Jarvis;Ari Levine

  • Volumetric MRI studies of mood disorders: do they distinguish unipolar and bipolar disorder?

    Stephen M Strakowski;Caleb M Adler;Melissa P DelBello

  • Effects of NMDA antagonism on striatal dopamine release in healthy subjects: application of a novel PET approach.

    Alan Breier;Caleb M. Adler;Neil Weisenfeld;Tung Ping Su

  • Abnormal frontal white matter tracts in bipolar disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

    Caleb M Adler;Scott K Holland;Vince Schmithorst;Marko Wilke

  • Evidence of white matter pathology in bipolar disorder adolescents experiencing their first episode of mania: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

    Caleb M. Adler;John Adams;Melissa P. DelBello;Scott K. Holland

  • Abnormal FMRI brain activation in euthymic bipolar disorder patients during a counting Stroop interference task.

    Stephen M. Strakowski;Caleb M. Adler;Scott K. Holland;Neil P. Mills

  • Changes in neuronal activation in patients with bipolar disorder during performance of a working memory task.

    Caleb M Adler;Scott K Holland;Vince Schmithorst;Michael J Tuchfarber

  • Impulsivity across the course of bipolar disorder.

    Stephen M Strakowski;Stephen M Strakowski;David E Fleck;Melissa P DelBello;Caleb M Adler

  • Changes in Gray Matter Volume in Patients with Bipolar Disorder

    Caleb M. Adler;Ari D. Levine;Melissa P. DelBello;Stephen M. Strakowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Strakowski
Stephen M. Strakowski The University of Texas at Austin
Melissa P. DelBello
Melissa P. DelBello University of Cincinnati
James C. Eliassen
James C. Eliassen University of Cincinnati Medical Center
David Pickar
David Pickar National Institutes of Health
Anil K. Malhotra
Anil K. Malhotra Hofstra University
Robert K. McNamara
Robert K. McNamara University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Scott K. Holland
Scott K. Holland Medpace (United States)
Paula K. Shear
Paula K. Shear University of Cincinnati
Alan Breier
Alan Breier Indiana University
John A. Sweeney
John A. Sweeney University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Caleb M. Adler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles