World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
11242
World Ranking
11526
National Ranking
416

J. Mark Cock publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Mark Cock sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 152 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

J. Mark Cock D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Mark Cock sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Mark Cock is affiliated with Sorbonne University in France and has contributed to multiple research areas primarily within Earth and Planetary Sciences, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The main subfields of their work include Oceanography, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Ecology, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. Their research topics show a strong focus on Marine and coastal plant biology, Algal biology and biofuel production, Marine Biology and Ecology Research, Protist diversity and phylogeny, Plant Molecular Biology Research, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, and Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds.

Frequent collaboration is noted with several coauthors, including:

  • Susana M. Coelho
  • Olivier Godfroy
  • Akira F. Peters
  • Delphine Scornet
  • Jean-Marc Aury

Publication venues where J. Mark Cock has frequently published include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Phycology
  • Genes
  • Genome biology
  • New Phytologist

Among recent papers are the following works:

  • Phylogeny and Evolution of the Brown Algae, 2020, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
  • Evolution of life cycles and reproductive traits: Insights from the brown algae, 2021, Journal of Evolutionary Biology
  • Role and Evolution of the Extracellular Matrix in the Acquisition of Complex Multicellularity in Eukaryotes: A Macroalgal Perspective, 2021, Genes
  • Targeted CRISPR-Cas9-based gene knockouts in the model brown alga Ectocarpus, 2021, New Phytologist
  • instaGRAAL: chromosome-level quality scaffolding of genomes using a proximity ligation-based scaffolder, 2020, Genome biology

Best Publications

  • The Ectocarpus genome and the independent evolution of multicellularity in brown algae

    J. Mark Cock;Lieven Sterck;Pierre Rouzé;Delphine Scornet

  • Pan genome of the phytoplankton Emiliania underpins its global distribution

    Betsy A. Read;Jessica Kegel;Mary J. Klute;Alan Kuo

  • The cell wall polysaccharide metabolism of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. Insights into the evolution of extracellular matrix polysaccharides in Eukaryotes.

    Gurvan Michel;Thierry Tonon;Delphine Scornet;J. Mark Cock

  • A large family of genes that share homology with CLAVATA3.

    J. Mark Cock;Sheila McCormick

  • Genome structure and metabolic features in the red seaweed Chondrus crispus shed light on evolution of the Archaeplastida.

    Jonas Collén;Betina Porcel;Betina Porcel;Wilfrid Carré;Steven G Ball

  • The S-locus receptor kinase is inhibited by thioredoxins and activated by pollen coat proteins

    Didier Cabrillac;J. Mark Cock;Christian Dumas;Thierry Gaude

  • BIGPETALp, a bHLH transcription factor is involved in the control of Arabidopsis petal size

    Judit Szécsi;Caroline Joly;Karim Bordji;Emilie Varaud

  • HECTAR: A method to predict subcellular targeting in heterokonts

    Bernhard Gschloessl;Yann Guermeur;J Mark Cock

  • Central and storage carbon metabolism of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus: insights into the origin and evolution of storage carbohydrates in Eukaryotes.

    Gurvan Michel;Thierry Tonon;Delphine Scornet;J. Mark Cock

  • Complex life cycles of multicellular eukaryotes: new approaches based on the use of model organisms.

    Susana M. Coelho;Akira F. Peters;Bénédicte Charrier;Denis Roze

  • PROPOSAL OF ECTOCARPUS SILICULOSUS (ECTOCARPALES, PHAEOPHYCEAE) AS A MODEL ORGANISM FOR BROWN ALGAL GENETICS AND GENOMICS1,2

    Akira F. Peters;Dominique Marie;Delphine Scornet;Bernard Kloareg

  • Global expression analysis of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus (Phaeophyceae) reveals large-scale reprogramming of the transcriptome in response to abiotic stress

    Simon M Dittami;Delphine Scornet;Jean-Louis Petit;Jean-Louis Petit;Béatrice Ségurens;Béatrice Ségurens

  • A Haploid System of Sex Determination in the Brown Alga Ectocarpus sp.

    Sophia Ahmed;Sophia Ahmed;J. Mark Cock;Eugenie Pessia;Remy Luthringer

  • Development and physiology of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus: two centuries of research.

    Bénédicte Charrier;Susana M. Coelho;Aude Le Bail;Thierry Tonon

  • Characterization of the S locus genes, SLG and SRK, of the Brassica S3 haplotype: identification of a membrane‐localized protein encoded by the S locus receptor kinase gene

    Valerie Delorme;Jean-Loic Giranton;Yves Hatzfeld;Aline Friry

  • The integral membrane S-locus receptor kinase of Brassica has serine/threonine kinase activity in a membranous environment and spontaneously forms oligomers in planta

    Jean-Loïc Giranton;Christian Dumas;J. Mark Cock;Thierry Gaude

  • Both the adaxial and abaxial epidermal layers of the rose petal emit volatile scent compounds.

    Véronique Bergougnoux;Jean-Claude Caissard;Frédéric Jullien;Jean-Louis Magnard

  • Interaction of Calmodulin, a Sorting Nexin and Kinase-Associated Protein Phosphatase with the Brassica oleracea S Locus Receptor Kinase

    Vincent Vanoosthuyse;Gabrielle Tichtinsky;Christian Dumas;Thierry Gaude

  • Sexual Dimorphism and the Evolution of Sex-Biased Gene Expression in the Brown Alga Ectocarpus

    Agnieszka Lipinska;Alexandre Cormier;Rémy Luthringer;Akira F. Peters

  • GeneFarm, structural and functional annotation of Arabidopsis gene and protein families by a network of experts

    Sébastien Aubourg;Véronique Brunaud;Clémence Bruyère;J. Mark Cock

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Dumas
Christian Dumas École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Yves Van de Peer
Yves Van de Peer Ghent University
Philippe Potin
Philippe Potin Sorbonne University
Gurvan Michel
Gurvan Michel Université Paris Cité
Myriam Valero
Myriam Valero Sorbonne University
Bernard Kloareg
Bernard Kloareg Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Marc Aury
Jean-Marc Aury University of Paris-Saclay
Pierre Rouzé
Pierre Rouzé Ghent University
Julie Poulain
Julie Poulain French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
Corinne Da Silva
Corinne Da Silva University of Paris-Saclay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing J. Mark Cock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles