World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5363 4978 251 247 133 13493
Neuroscience 52 5230 4804 436 411 142 13840

Ilya M. Veer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ilya M. Veer between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ilya M. Veer published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 17 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 12 publications
2008 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ilya M. Veer: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 6
2012 2
2013 10
2014 8
2015 16
2016 11
2017 19
2018 7
2019 8
2020 19
2021 14
2022 12
2023 17
2024 5
2025 12
Total 172
Download as CSV

Ilya M. Veer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilya M. Veer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 142 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456 142
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Ilya M. Veer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilya M. Veer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418 52
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Ilya M. Veer is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research spans multiple domains within psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, contributing extensively to the understanding of brain and mental health. The primary fields of study in which they have published include Psychology, Neuroscience, and Medicine, with notable work in subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Applied Psychology.

The researcher's work focuses on key topics including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Mental Health Research Topics, Resilience and Mental Health, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ilya M. Veer cover a range of subjects and have appeared in various scientific journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group (2020, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown (2021, Translational Psychiatry)
  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing (2020, Translational Psychiatry)
  • Positive Cognitive Reappraisal in Stress Resilience, Mental Health, and Well-Being: A Comprehensive Systematic Review (2022, Emotion Review)
  • Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders (2020, Molecular Psychiatry)

Ilya M. Veer collaborates frequently with several researchers in the field. Among the most frequent co-authors are Henrik Walter, Raffaël Kalisch, Lea Waller, Dan J. Stein, and Antje Riepenhausen.

Their research outputs appear regularly in a variety of scientific venues. Frequently used publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Psychiatry, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Human Brain Mapping, and Scientific Reports.

Best Publications

  • Cortical abnormalities in adults and adolescents with major depression based on brain scans from 20 cohorts worldwide in the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder Working Group.

    L Schmaal;D P Hibar;P G Sämann;G B Hall

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder : findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    Tiffany C. Ho;Boris Gutman;Elena Pozzi;Hans J. Grabe

  • The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders

    Raffael Kalisch;Dewleen G. Baker;Dewleen G. Baker;Ulrike Basten;Ulrike Basten;Marco P. Boks

  • Whole brain resting-state analysis reveals decreased functional connectivity in major depression

    Ilya M. Veer;Ilya M. Veer;Christian F. Beckmann;Christian F. Beckmann;Marie-Jose van Tol;Marie-Jose van Tol;Luca Ferrarini

  • Strongly reduced volumes of putamen and thalamus in Alzheimer's disease: an MRI study.

    L. W. de Jong;K. van der Hiele;I. M. Veer;J. J. Houwing

  • ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries

    Paul M Thompson;Neda Jahanshad;Christopher R K Ching;Lauren E Salminen

  • ENIGMA and Global Neuroscience: A Decade of Large-Scale Studies of the Brain in Health and Disease Across More Than 40 Countries

    Paul Thompson

  • White matter disturbances in major depressive disorder: a coordinated analysis across 20 international cohorts in the ENIGMA MDD working group

    Laura S. van Velzen;Sinead Kelly;Sinead Kelly;Dmitry Isaev;Andre Aleman

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    L. Schmaal;D.J. Veltman;T.G.M. van Erp;P.G. Sämann

  • Beyond acute social stress: increased functional connectivity between amygdala and cortical midline structures.

    Ilya M. Veer;Nicole Y.L. Oei;Philip Spinhoven;Mark A. van Buchem

  • Cortical thickness across the lifespan: Data from 17,075 healthy individuals aged 3-90 years

    Sophia Frangou;Amirhossein Modabbernia;Steven C. R. Williams;Efstathios Papachristou

  • Deconstructing and Reconstructing Resilience: A Dynamic Network Approach:

    Raffael Kalisch;Angélique O J Cramer;Harald Binder;Jessica Fritz

  • Hierarchical functional modularity in the resting‐state human brain

    Luca Ferrarini;Ilya M. Veer;Evelinda Baerends;Marie-Jose van Tol

  • Structural and functional brain connectivity in presymptomatic familial frontotemporal dementia

    E.G.P. Dopper;S.A.R.B. Rombouts;L.C. Jiskoot;T. den Heijer

  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing

    Lianne Schmaal;Elena Pozzi;Tiffany C Ho;Tiffany C Ho;Laura S van Velzen

  • Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown.

    Ilya M Veer;Antje Riepenhausen;Matthias Zerban;Carolin Wackerhagen

  • Endogenous cortisol is associated with functional connectivity between the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex

    Ilya M. Veer;Ilya M. Veer;Nicole Y.L. Oei;Nicole Y.L. Oei;Philip Spinhoven;Mark A. van Buchem;Mark A. van Buchem

  • Resting-state functional connectivity in adults with childhood emotional maltreatment

    S. J. A. van der Werff;J. N. Pannekoek;I. M. Veer;van Marie Jose Tol

  • Resting-state functional connectivity abnormalities in limbic and salience networks in social anxiety disorder without comorbidity

    J. Nienke Pannekoek;J. Nienke Pannekoek;Ilya M. Veer;Ilya M. Veer;Marie-José van Tol;Marie-José van Tol;Steven J.A. van der Werff;Steven J.A. van der Werff

  • Aberrant resting-state functional connectivity in limbic and salience networks in treatment--naïve clinically depressed adolescents.

    Justine Nienke Pannekoek;S.J.A. van der Werff;Paul H.F. Meens;Bianca G. van den Bulk

Frequent Co-Authors

Henrik Walter
Henrik Walter Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts Leiden University
Thomas Frodl
Thomas Frodl Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Lianne Schmaal
Lianne Schmaal University of Melbourne
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Neda Jahanshad
Neda Jahanshad University of Southern California
André Aleman
André Aleman University Medical Center Groningen
Nic J.A. van der Wee
Nic J.A. van der Wee Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Neuroscience have a variety of related online programs and career directions to consider. Many choose to further their studies through psyd programs, which prepare graduates for advanced clinical and research roles in psychology and mental health.

Another popular choice is pursuing a counseling path. The best online mft programs allow for flexible study in marriage and family therapy, equipping students with skills to support mental wellbeing in diverse settings.

For those looking for quicker entry into the workforce, an accelerated bachelor's degree can fast-track your qualifications. These programs are ideal for motivated learners ready to begin their careers sooner.

Choosing your degree can also influence your earning potential. Neuroscience, psychology, and related fields are included among the highest paid degrees, especially when combined with clinical or research specializations.

Whether you’re interested in clinical practice, therapy, or research, exploring these online degree pathways can help you achieve your academic and professional goals in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ilya M. Veer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles