World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 23 1778 1634 1 1 136 2272

Horacio Larreguy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Horacio Larreguy between 2012 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Horacio Larreguy published across 15 years, from 2012 to 2026, averaging 15.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 90 publications in 2020. 16 of the 232 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2012 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 90. Peak 90 publications in 2020. 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 56 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 90 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
2012 2026

232 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Horacio Larreguy: publications per year, 2012 to 2026
Year Publications
2012 2
2013 1
2014 10
2015 3
2016 5
2017 56
2018 6
2019 15
2020 90
2021 8
2022 4
2023 7
2024 9
2025 15
2026 1
Total 232
Download as CSV

Horacio Larreguy publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Horacio Larreguy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 136–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 136 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45 136
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Horacio Larreguy D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Horacio Larreguy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 23 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 23 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68 23
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Deliberate disengagement: How education decreases political participation in electoral authoritarian regimes

    Kevin Croke;Guy Grossman;Horacio A. Larreguy;John Marshall

  • Parties, Brokers, and Voter Mobilization: How Turnout Buying Depends Upon the Party’s Capacity to Monitor Brokers

    Horacio Larreguy;John Marshall;Pablo Querubín

  • Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation

    Unknown

  • Agents of the Regime? Traditional Leaders and Electoral Politics in South Africa

    Daniel de Kadt;Horacio A. Larreguy

  • Countering misinformation via WhatsApp: Preliminary evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe.

    Jeremy Bowles;Horacio Larreguy;Shelley Liu

  • Voter information campaigns and political accountability: Cumulative findings from a preregistered meta-analysis of coordinated trials.

    Thad Dunning;Guy Grossman;Macartan Humphreys;Susan D. Hyde

  • Testing Models of Social Learning on Networks: Evidence From Two Experiments

    Arun G. Chandrasekhar;Horacio Larreguy;Juan Pablo Xandri

  • The Effect of Education on Civic and Political Engagement in Nonconsolidated Democracies: Evidence from Nigeria

    Horacio A. Larreguy;John Marshall

  • Testing Models of Social Learning on Networks: Evidence from a Lab Experiment in the Field

    Arun G Chandrasekhar;Horacio Larreguy;Juan Pablo Xandri

  • Political Brokers: Partisans or Agents? Evidence from the Mexican Teachers' Union

    Horacio Larreguy;Cesar E. Montiel Olea;Pablo Querubin

  • Social Networks as Contract Enforcement: Evidence from a Lab Experiment in the Field

    Arun G Chandrasekhar;Cynthia Kinnan;Horacio Larreguy

  • Toolbox of Interventions Against Online Misinformation

    Unknown

  • Priors Rule : When do Malfeasance Revelations Help and Hurt Incumbent Parties

    Unknown

  • Publicising Malfeasance: When the Local Media Structure Facilitates Electoral Accountability in Mexico

    Horacio Larreguy;John Marshall;James M Snyder

  • How Weakly Institutionalized Parties Monitor Brokers in Developing Democracies: Evidence from Postconflict Liberia

    Jeremy Bowles;Horacio Larreguy;Shelley Liu

  • Information Provision, Voter Coordination, and Electoral Accountability: Evidence from Mexican Social Networks

    Eric Arias;Pablo Balán;Horacio Larreguy;John Marshall

  • An Informational Theory of Electoral Targeting in Young Clientelistic Democracies: Evidence from Senegal

    Jessica Gottlieb;Horacio Larreguy

  • Monitoring Political Brokers: Evidence from Clientelistic Networks in Mexico

    Horacio Alejandro Larreguy

  • Deliberate Disengagement: How Education Can Decrease Political Participation in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes

    Unknown

  • Leveling the Playing Field: How Campaign Advertising Can Help Non-Dominant Parties

    Horacio A. Larreguy;John Marshall;James Snyder

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. Snyder
James M. Snyder Harvard University
Guy Grossman
Guy Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Craig McIntosh
Craig McIntosh University of California, San Diego
Macartan Humphreys
Macartan Humphreys Social Science Research Center Berlin
Daniel L. Nielson
Daniel L. Nielson Brigham Young University
Eric Kramon
Eric Kramon George Washington University
John Lusingu
John Lusingu University of Copenhagen
Günther Fink
Günther Fink Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
James E. Alt
James E. Alt Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Horacio Larreguy

Recently Published Articles