World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
31
Citations
6320
World Ranking
7443
National Ranking
3629

Greg Pogarsky publications per year

1996: 1 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publications 2000: 1 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publications 2008: 1 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publications 2013: 1 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publications 2017: 1 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 1 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publications
1996 2025

59 publications in total across all disciplines

Greg Pogarsky publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Pogarsky sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 59 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Greg Pogarsky D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Pogarsky sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • INTEGRATING CELERITY, IMPULSIVITY, AND EXTRALEGAL SANCTION THREATS INTO A MODEL OF GENERAL DETERRENCE: THEORY AND EVIDENCE*

    Daniel S. Nagin;Greg Pogarsky

  • AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF DETERRENCE: CHEATING, SELF‐SERVING BIAS, AND IMPULSIVITY*

    Daniel S. Nagin;Greg Pogarsky

  • Identifying “deterrable” offenders: Implications for research on deterrence

    Greg Pogarsky

  • Rational choice, agency and thoughtfully reflective decision making: The short and long-term consequences of making good choices.

    Ray Paternoster;Greg Pogarsky

  • Beyond Stafford and Warr's Reconceptualization of Deterrence: Personal and Vicarious Experiences, Impulsivity, and Offending Behavior

    Alex R. Piquero;Greg Pogarsky

  • Can Punishment Encourage Offending? Investigating The “resetting” Effect:

    Greg Pogarsky;Alex R. Piquero

  • Elaborating the Individual Difference Component in Deterrence Theory

    Alex R. Piquero;Raymond Paternoster;Greg Pogarsky;Thomas Loughran

  • Self-control Depletion and the General Theory of Crime

    Mark Muraven;Greg Pogarsky;Dikla Shmueli

  • Time and Punishment: Delayed Consequences and Criminal Behavior

    Daniel S. Nagin;Greg Pogarsky

  • PROJECTED OFFENDING AND CONTEMPORANEOUS RULE‐VIOLATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR HETEROTYPIC CONTINUITY*

    Greg Pogarsky

  • Modeling Change in Perceptions about Sanction Threats: The Neglected Linkage in Deterrence Theory

    Greg Pogarsky;Alex R. Piquero;Ray Paternoster

  • Adolescent mothers and the criminal behavior of their children.

    Daniel S. Nagin;Greg Pogarsky;David P. Farrington

  • Developmental Outcomes for Children of Young Mothers

    Greg Pogarsky;Terence P. Thornberry;Alan J. Lizotte

  • ON AMBIGUITY IN PERCEPTIONS OF RISK:IMPLICATIONS FOR CRIMINAL DECISION MAKING AND DETERRENCE*

    Thomas A. Loughran;Raymond Paternoster;Alex R. Piquero;Greg Pogarsky

  • Studying the reach of deterrence: Can deterrence theory help explain police misconduct?

    Greg Pogarsky;Alex R. Piquero

  • Deterrence and Individual Differences Among Convicted Offenders

    Greg Pogarsky

  • TOWARD A BIFURCATED THEORY OF EMOTIONAL DETERRENCE

    Justin T. Pickett;Sean Patrick Roche;Greg Pogarsky

  • HEURISTICS AND BIASES, RATIONAL CHOICE, AND SANCTION PERCEPTIONS*

    Greg Pogarsky;Sean Patrick Roche;Justin T. Pickett

  • Offender Decision-Making in Criminology: Contributions from Behavioral Economics

    Greg Pogarsky;Sean Patrick Roche;Justin T. Pickett

  • Prior Police Contact and Subsequent Victim Reporting: Results from the NCVS

    Min Xie;Greg Pogarsky;James P. Lynch;David McDowall

Frequent Co-Authors

Justin T. Pickett
Justin T. Pickett University at Albany, State University of New York
Alex R. Piquero
Alex R. Piquero University of Miami
Daniel S. Nagin
Daniel S. Nagin Carnegie Mellon University
Raymond Paternoster
Raymond Paternoster University of Maryland, College Park
Terence P. Thornberry
Terence P. Thornberry University of Maryland, College Park
Alan J. Lizotte
Alan J. Lizotte University at Albany, State University of New York
David P. Farrington
David P. Farrington University of Cambridge
David McDowall
David McDowall University at Albany, State University of New York
Mark Muraven
Mark Muraven University at Albany, State University of New York
Min Xie
Min Xie City University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Greg Pogarsky

Recently Published Articles