World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
64
Citations
45090
World Ranking
2730
National Ranking
1198

Glen A. Evans publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glen A. Evans sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 189 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Glen A. Evans D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glen A. Evans sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glen A. Evans was affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their academic and research career involved contributions in scientific fields, although specific details about their publications, research topics, and areas of specialization are not documented here.

Throughout their career, Evans did not have recorded frequent co-authors or commonly associated publication venues. The absence of detailed information about their recent papers, fields of study, subfields, or main research topics limits a comprehensive view of their scientific focus.

Additionally, there are no publicly available records of book publications or awards received by Evans. This suggests either limited publication output beyond articles or a lack of recorded data in these categories.

Their status is noted as deceased, and thus their body of work represents a completed academic contribution without ongoing research activities. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center served as the primary institutional affiliation during their active years.

Best Publications

  • Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

    Eric S. Lander;Lauren M. Linton;Bruce Birren;Chad Nusbaum

  • High-resolution mapping of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridization with cosmid clones.

    Peter Lichter;Chieh-Ju Chang Tang;Katherine Call;Gary Hermanson

  • ATLAS detector and physics performance : Technical Design Report, 1

    A. Airapetian;V. Dodonov;L. Micu;D. Axen

  • A trithorax-like gene is interrupted by chromosome 11q23 translocations in acute leukaemias.

    Malek Djabali;Licia Selleri;Pauline Parry;Mark Bower

  • Alterations of the PPP2R1B Gene in Human Lung and Colon Cancer

    Steven Siqing Wang;Edward D. Esplin;Jia Ling Li;Liying Huang

  • The EXT2 multiple exostoses gene defines a family of putative tumour suppressor genes

    Dominique Stickens;Dominique Stickens;Gregory Clines;David Burbee;Purita Ramos

  • Cosmid vectors for rapid genomic walking, restriction mapping, and gene transfer

    Geoffrey M. Wahl;Kathy A. Lewis;Joseph C. Ruiz;Barry Rothenberg

  • Exon shuffling: mapping polymorphic determinants on hybrid mouse transplantation antigens

    Glen A. Evans;David H. Margulies;Benjamin Shykind;J. G. Seidman

  • High efficiency vectors for cosmid microcloning and genomic analysis

    Glen A. Evans;Kathy Lewis;Barry E. Rothenberg

  • Structure and expression of a mouse major histocompatibility antigen gene, H-2Ld

    G A Evans;D H Margulies;R D Camerini-Otero;K Ozato

  • Detection and characterization of additional DNA polymorphisms in the dopamine D2 receptor gene.

    Xue Ya Hauge;David K. Grandy;James H. Eubanks;Glen A. Evans

  • Cloning and characterization of the t(X;11) breakpoint from a leukemic cell line identify a new member of the forkhead gene family.

    Pauline Parry;Yalin Wei;Glen Evans

  • Physical mapping of complex genomes by cosmid multiplex analysis

    G A Evans;K A Lewis

  • EWS-erg and EWS-Fli1 fusion transcripts in Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumors with variant translocations.

    Marco Giovannini;Jaclyn A. Biegel;Massimo Serra;Jian Ying Wang

  • Loss of heterozygosity in sporadic human breast carcinoma: a common region between 11q22 and 11q23.3.

    Hampton Gm;Mannermaa A;Winqvist R;Alavaikko M

  • Association of Dolomite and Anhydrite in the Recent Sediments of the Persian Gulf

    R. Curtis;G. Evans;D. J. J. Kinsman;D. J. Shearman

  • Expression of H-2Dd and H-2Ld mouse major histocompatibility antigen genes in L cells after DNA-mediated gene transfer.

    D H Margulies;G A Evans;K Ozato;R D Camerini-Otero

  • Loss of Heterozygosity for Chromosome 11 in Primary Human Breast Tumors Is Associated with Poor Survival after Metastasis

    R. Winqvist;R. Winqvist;G. M. Hampton;A. Mannermaa;G. Blanco

  • Electronic Genetic-Physical and Biological Aspects of Cellular Electromanipulation

    Gunter A. Hofmann;Glen A. Evans

  • Optimization of electroporation for transfection of mammalian cell lines

    Grai L. Andreason;Glen A. Evans

Frequent Co-Authors

Licia Selleri
Licia Selleri University of California, San Francisco
James H. Eubanks
James H. Eubanks University Health Network
Marco Giovannini
Marco Giovannini University of California, Los Angeles
Norma J. Nowak
Norma J. Nowak University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Michael W. Smith
Michael W. Smith Johns Hopkins University
Thomas B. Shows
Thomas B. Shows Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Mark Bower
Mark Bower Imperial College London
John Quackenbush
John Quackenbush Harvard University
John Douglas Mcpherson
John Douglas Mcpherson University of California, Davis
Leroy Hood
Leroy Hood University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and careers in healthcare and health sciences. For students considering alternative or complementary pathways, there are flexible and affordable educational options that suit diverse goals and schedules.

Those interested in medical data and administration can look into a low cost medical coding and billing online program, which equips graduates with marketable skills for the fast-growing healthcare industry. If clinical roles appeal to you, there are good nursing schools with high acceptance rates that offer accessible paths to entering the nursing field.

For those seeking leadership roles, consider an accelerated healthcare administration degree online, designed to help you earn your qualifications faster and advance your career sooner. Additionally, many reputable institutions provide flexible and affordable health administration degrees online for those who want to make a meaningful impact in healthcare management without interrupting their current commitments.

These online programs offer practical routes into healthcare and related fields, providing valuable alternatives and complements to genetics studies.

Best Scientists Citing Glen A. Evans

Recently Published Articles