World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Francisca Fernández-Piñas

Francisca Fernández-Piñas

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7366
World Ranking
6749
National Ranking
188

Francisca Fernández-Piñas publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisca Fernández-Piñas sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 117 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Francisca Fernández-Piñas D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisca Fernández-Piñas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Toxicity of five antibiotics and their mixtures towards photosynthetic aquatic organisms: implications for environmental risk assessment.

    Miguel González-Pleiter;Soledad Gonzalo;Ismael Rodea-Palomares;Francisco Leganés

  • Fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and their environmental dispersion with effluent and sludge.

    Carlos Edo;Miguel González-Pleiter;Francisco Leganés;Francisca Fernández-Piñas

  • Secondary nanoplastics released from a biodegradable microplastic severely impact freshwater environments

    Miguel González-Pleiter;Miguel Tamayo-Belda;Gerardo Pulido-Reyes;Georgiana Amariei

  • Untangling the biological effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles: the role of surface valence states.

    Gerardo Pulido-Reyes;Ismael Rodea-Palomares;Soumen Das;Tamil Selvan Sakthivel

  • Occurrence and transport of microplastics sampled within and above the planetary boundary layer.

    Miguel González-Pleiter;Miguel González-Pleiter;Carlos Edo;Ángeles Aguilera;Daniel Viúdez-Moreiras

  • Fibers spreading worldwide: Microplastics and other anthropogenic litter in an Arctic freshwater lake

    Miguel González-Pleiter;David Velázquez;Carlos Edo;Olga Carretero

  • Ageing and fragmentation of marine microplastics.

    Unknown

  • First detection of microplastics in the freshwater of an Antarctic Specially Protected Area.

    Miguel González-Pleiter;Carlos Edo;David Velázquez;María Cristina Casero-Chamorro

  • Application of the combination index (CI)-isobologram equation to study the toxicological interactions of lipid regulators in two aquatic bioluminescent organisms

    Ismael Rodea-Palomares;Alice L. Petre;Karina Boltes;Francisco Leganés

  • Honeybees as active samplers for microplastics.

    Carlos Edo;Amadeo R. Fernández-Alba;Flemming Vejsnæs;Jozef J.M. van der Steen

  • Global warming and hepatotoxin production by cyanobacteria: what can we learn from experiments?

    Rehab El-Shehawy;Elena Gorokhova;Francisca Fernández-Piñas;Francisca F. del Campo

  • Ecotoxicological assessment of surfactants in the aquatic environment: combined toxicity of docusate sodium with chlorinated pollutants.

    Roberto Rosal;Ismael Rodea-Palomares;Karina Boltes;Francisca Fernández-Piñas

  • Toxicological interactions of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) with selected pollutants.

    Ismael Rodea-Palomares;Francisco Leganés;Roberto Rosal;Francisca Fernández-Piñas

  • Ecotoxicity assessment of lipid regulators in water and biologically treated wastewater using three aquatic organisms

    Roberto Rosal;Ismael Rodea-Palomares;Karina Boltes;Francisca Fernández-Piñas

  • Microplastics identification and quantification in the composted Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste

    Carlos Edo;Francisca Fernández-Piñas;Roberto Rosal

  • An insight into the mechanisms of nanoceria toxicity in aquatic photosynthetic organisms

    Ismael Rodea-Palomares;Soledad Gonzalo;Javier Santiago-Morales;Francisco Leganés

  • Bio-nano interface and environment: A critical review.

    Gerardo Pulido-Reyes;Gerardo Pulido-Reyes;Francisco Leganes;Francisca Fernández-Piñas;Roberto Rosal

  • Microplastics as vectors of the antibiotics azithromycin and clarithromycin: Effects towards freshwater microalgae.

    Miguel González-Pleiter;Miguel González-Pleiter;Alicia Pedrouzo-Rodríguez;Irene Verdú;Francisco Leganés

  • Early and differential bacterial colonization on microplastics deployed into the effluents of wastewater treatment plants.

    Sergio Martínez-Campos;Miguel González-Pleiter;Francisca Fernández-Piñas;Roberto Rosal

  • Occurrence and identification of microplastics along a beach in the Biosphere Reserve of Lanzarote.

    Carlos Edo;Miguel Tamayo-Belda;Sergio Martínez-Campos;Keila Martín-Betancor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up diverse career pathways, often supported by various related online degree programs. For professionals seeking advancement in education-focused roles, exploring eds to edd program options can provide transformative leadership and research skills applicable in environmental education and policy-making.

For those interested in community health and social aspects of environmental work, an online dsw program offers a practical path to become experts in social work while addressing environmental justice issues.

If you’re considering entry-level roles or career switches, many institutions offer most affordable online general studies degree programs. These programs can provide foundational knowledge while maintaining flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Additionally, those seeking a smoother transition into higher education may find that some of the easy bachelor's degree options available online can help build relevant skillsets without overwhelming demands, ideal for balancing work and study.

Recently Published Articles