World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
6612
World Ranking
9442
National Ranking
936

Faith Matcham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Faith Matcham sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Faith Matcham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Faith Matcham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The prevalence of depression in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Faith Matcham;Lauren Rayner;Sophia Steer;Matthew Hotopf

  • The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on quality-of-life assessed using the SF-36: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Faith Matcham;Ian C. Scott;Lauren Rayner;Matthew Hotopf

  • Depression in patients with chronic pain attending a specialised pain treatment centre: prevalence and impact on health care costs.

    Lauren Jessica Haskell Rayner;Matthew Hugo Hotopf;Hristina Petkova;Faith Alexandra Elisabeth Matcham

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings

    Sara Simblett;Ben Greer;Faith Matcham;Hannah Curtis

  • Symptoms of depression and anxiety predict treatment response and long-term physical health outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

    Faith Alexandra Elisabeth Matcham;Sam Norton;David Lloyd Scott;Sophia Steer

  • Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: a systematic review of methods

    Unknown

  • Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer

    Giovanni Ostuzzi;Faith Alexandra Elisabeth Matcham;Sarah Dauchy;Corrado Barbui

  • Using Smartphones and Wearable Devices to Monitor Behavioral Changes During COVID-19.

    Shaoxiong Sun;Amos A. Folarin;Amos A. Folarin;Yatharth Ranjan;Zulqarnain Rashid

  • Using smartphones and wearable devices to monitor behavioural changes during COVID-19

    Shaoxiong Sun;Amos Folarin;Yatharth Ranjan;Zulqarnain Rashid

  • Remote assessment of disease and relapse in major depressive disorder (RADAR-MDD): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol

    F. Matcham;C. Barattieri di San Pietro;V. Bulgari;G. de Girolamo

  • Embedding integrated mental health assessment and management in general hospital settings: feasibility, acceptability and the prevalence of common mental disorder

    L. Rayner;F. Matcham;J. Hutton;C. Stringer

  • Psychological correlates of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review

    Faith Matcham;Sheila Ali;Matthew Hotopf;Trudie Chalder

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With mHealth Technology for Remote Measurement and Management of Depression: Qualitative Analysis.

    Simblett S;Matcham F;Siddi S;Bulgari

  • A systematic review of anxiety amongst people with Multiple Sclerosis

    Ellen Butler;Faith Matcham;Trudie Chalder

  • Are depression and anxiety associated with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis? A prospective study

    Faith Alexandra Elisabeth Matcham;Sheila Ali;Katherine Irving;Matthew Hugo Hotopf

  • Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder (RADAR-MDD): recruitment, retention, and data availability in a longitudinal remote measurement study

    Unknown

  • Usefulness of the SF-36 Health Survey in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders in rheumatoid arthritis

    Faith Alexandra Elisabeth Matcham;Sam Norton;Sophia Steer;Matthew Hugo Hotopf

  • Screening for anxiety and depression in people with psoriasis: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary referral setting.

    R.C. Lamb;Faith Matcham;M Turner;Lauren Rayner

  • Self-help interventions for symptoms of depression, anxiety and psychological distress in patients with physical illnesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Faith Alexandra Elisabeth Matcham;Lauren Jessica Haskell Rayner;Jane Hutton;Anna Monk

  • The relationship between depression and biologic treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis of the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register.

    Faith Matcham;Rebecca Davies;Rebecca Davies;Matthew Hotopf;Matthew Hotopf;Kimme L Hyrich;Kimme L Hyrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew Hotopf
Matthew Hotopf King's College London
Til Wykes
Til Wykes King's College London
Sam Norton
Sam Norton King's College London
Nicholas Cummins
Nicholas Cummins King's College London
David Scott
David Scott Ascension Health
Trudie Chalder
Trudie Chalder King's College London
Femke Lamers
Femke Lamers Amsterdam UMC
Giancarlo Comi
Giancarlo Comi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Faith Matcham

Recently Published Articles