World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 68 7689 7093 199 183 240 19932

Eiko E. Kuramae publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eiko E. Kuramae between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eiko E. Kuramae published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2022. 15 of the 255 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2022. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

255 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eiko E. Kuramae: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 6
2003 6
2004 3
2005 3
2006 6
2007 4
2008 6
2009 1
2010 3
2011 2
2012 2
2013 6
2014 8
2015 10
2016 13
2017 9
2018 15
2019 20
2020 23
2021 20
2022 25
2023 21
2024 22
2025 14
2026 1
Total 255
Download as CSV

Eiko E. Kuramae publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eiko E. Kuramae sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 237–246 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 240 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605 240
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Eiko E. Kuramae D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eiko E. Kuramae sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814 68
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eiko E. Kuramae is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with a stronger emphasis on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, evidenced by 193 publications in this field. Within these disciplines, Kuramae has contributed extensively to several subfields, including Plant Science, Soil Science, Ecology, Molecular Biology, and Environmental Chemistry.

The main topics addressed in Kuramae's work span Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity, Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions, Gut Microbiota and Health, and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies.

Kuramae has published several papers, some of which have received a notable number of citations. Selected recent publications include:

  • Fusarium: more than a node or a foot-shaped basal cell (2021), published in Studies in Mycology
  • Long-term lime and gypsum amendment increase nitrogen fixation and decrease nitrification and denitrification gene abundances in the rhizosphere and soil in a tropical no-till intercropping system (2020), Geoderma
  • Cultivation-independent and cultivation-dependent metagenomes reveal genetic and enzymatic potential of microbial community involved in the degradation of a complex microbial polymer (2020), Microbiome
  • Effects of growth-promoting bacteria on soybean root activity, plant development, and yield (2020), Agronomy Journal
  • From toilet to agriculture: Fertilization with microalgal biomass from wastewater impacts the soil and rhizosphere active microbiomes, greenhouse gas emissions and plant growth (2020), Resources Conservation and Recycling

Kuramae frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Major co-authors include Márcio Fernandes Alves Leite, Ohana Y. A. Costa, George A. Kowalchuk, Carlos Alexandre Costa Crusciol, and João William Bossolani.

Regarding publication venues, Kuramae has an extensive record in journals such as Microorganisms, The Science of The Total Environment, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Applied Soil Ecology, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Best Publications

  • Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning

    Cameron Wagg;Cameron Wagg;Klaus Schlaeppi;Samiran Banerjee;Eiko E. Kuramae

  • The genome sequence of the plant pathogen Xylella fastidiosa

    A. J.G. Simpson;F. C. Reinach;P. Arruda;F. A. Abreu

  • Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Ecological Function and Impact on Soil Aggregation.

    Ohana Y. A. Costa;Jos M Raaijmakers;Eiko Eurya Kuramae

  • The Ecology of Acidobacteria: Moving beyond Genes and Genomes.

    Anna M. Kielak;Cristine C. Barreto;George A. Kowalchuk;Johannes A. van Veen

  • Taxonomical and functional microbial community selection in soybean rhizosphere.

    Lucas W Mendes;Eiko E Kuramae;Acácio A Navarrete;Johannes A van Veen

  • Comparative Genomics of Two Leptospira interrogans Serovars Reveals Novel Insights into Physiology and Pathogenesis

    A. L. T. O. Nascimento;A. I. Ko;A. I. Ko;E. A. L. Martins;C. B. Monteiro-Vitorello

  • Dandruff-associated Malassezia genomes reveal convergent and divergent virulence traits shared with plant and human fungal pathogens

    Jun Xu;Charles W. Saunders;Ping Hu;Raymond A. Grant

  • Soil characteristics more strongly influence soil bacterial communities than land‐use type

    Eiko E. Kuramae;Etienne Yergeau;Lina C. Wong;Agata S. Pijl

  • Comparative analyses of the complete genome sequences of Pierce's disease and citrus variegated chlorosis strains of Xylella fastidiosa

    M. A. Van Sluys;M. C. De Oliveira;C. B. Monteiro-Vitorello;C. Y. Miyaki

  • Analysis and functional annotation of an expressed sequence tag collection for tropical crop sugarcane.

    André L. Vettore;André L. Vettore;Felipe R. da Silva;Felipe R. da Silva;Edson L. Kemper;Edson L. Kemper;Glaucia M. Souza

  • Root-associated microbiomes of wheat under the combined effect of plant development and nitrogen fertilization

    Shuaimin Chen;Tatoba R. Waghmode;Ruibo Sun;Eiko E. Kuramae

  • Fusarium: more than a node or a foot-shaped basal cell.

    P.W. Crous;P.W. Crous;L. Lombard;M. Sandoval-Denis;K.A. Seifert

  • Soil-Borne Microbiome: Linking Diversity to Function

    Lucas William Mendes;Siu Mui Tsai;Acácio A. Navarrete;Mattias de Hollander

  • Legacy of land use history determines reprogramming of plant physiology by soil microbiome.

    Xiaogang Li;Alexandre Jousset;Wietse de Boer;Víctor J. Carrión

  • Acidobacterial community responses to agricultural management of soybean in Amazon forest soils.

    Acácio A. Navarrete;Eiko E. Kuramae;Mattias de Hollander;Agata S. Pijl

  • Soil Microbiome Is More Heterogeneous in Organic Than in Conventional Farming System.

    Manoeli Lupatini;Gerard W. Korthals;Mattias de Hollander;Thierry K. S. Janssens

  • Functional traits dominate the diversity-related selection of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere.

    Yan Yan;Eiko E Kuramae;Mattias de Hollander;Peter G L Klinkhamer

  • Network topology reveals high connectance levels and few key microbial genera within soils

    Manoeli Lupatini;Afnan K. A. Suleiman;Rodrigo J. S. Jacques;Zaida I. Antoniolli

  • Impact of long-term N, P, K, and NPK fertilization on the composition and potential functions of the bacterial community in grassland soil

    Yao Pan;Noriko Cassman;Mattias de Hollander;Lucas W. Mendes

  • Six monophyletic lineages identified within Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii by multi-locus sequence typing.

    M. Bovers;F. Hagen;E.E. Kuramae;T. Boekhout

Frequent Co-Authors

Siu Mui Tsai
Siu Mui Tsai Universidade de São Paulo
George A. Kowalchuk
George A. Kowalchuk Utrecht University
Heitor Cantarella
Heitor Cantarella IAC (United States)
Teun Boekhout
Teun Boekhout University of Amsterdam
Maria Helena S. Goldman
Maria Helena S. Goldman Universidade de São Paulo
Luiz Lehmann Coutinho
Luiz Lehmann Coutinho Universidade de São Paulo
Gustavo H. Goldman
Gustavo H. Goldman Universidade de São Paulo
João C. Setubal
João C. Setubal Universidade de São Paulo
Carlos Alexandre Costa Crusciol
Carlos Alexandre Costa Crusciol Sao Paulo State University
Marcel G. A. van der Heijden
Marcel G. A. van der Heijden University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding pathways, many of which can now be pursued online. For students seeking a direct route into patient care, registered nurse online programs offer a flexible option to become a licensed RN, allowing graduates to enter the healthcare workforce quickly.

Another popular option is to explore the field of diet and nutrition through a nutritionist degree online. This pathway prepares students to become nutritionists and dietitians, experts in using food and science to promote good health.

For those aiming for leadership roles or hospital administration, top cahme accredited mha programs provide the recognized credentials needed for management positions in healthcare organizations.

Finally, registered nurses who want to further advance their clinical knowledge and credentials can consider msn to dnp online no clinicals options. These online programs offer doctoral-level training without requiring additional in-person clinical hours.

Whether you are interested in direct care, nutrition, administration, or advanced nursing, there are online degrees to help you achieve your career goals in biology and biochemistry fields.

Best Scientists Citing Eiko E. Kuramae

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles