World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth

Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
57
Citations
19141
World Ranking
1728
National Ranking
830

Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 170 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement primarily through this institution, where they pursue their research activities and contribute to the scientific community.

The available data does not provide detailed information regarding recent publications, making it difficult to summarize specific areas of current research output or thematic focus within their work. No records of recent papers, including titles, years, publication venues, or citation counts, are present.

Information about frequent co-authors or common collaborative partners is not available, so no specific network or teamwork patterns can be identified in this profile.

Similarly, there are no recorded frequent publication venues connected with this researcher, which limits insight into particular journals or conferences where their work is typically disseminated.

There is no data regarding books published by Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth or publishers associated with such works.

Details pertaining to their main fields of study, subfields, or core topics addressed in their research have not been supplied, which restricts the ability to describe the scientific domains or thematic foci that define their contributions.

No awards or recognitions have been documented for this scientist.

Based on the current data, the profile focuses primarily on the known institutional affiliation without further elaboration on research outputs or scientific specializations.

Best Publications

  • The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory

    Leonard R. Derogatis;Ronald S. Lipman;Karl Rickels;E. H. Uhlenhuth

  • Insomnia and Its Treatment: Prevalence and Correlates

    Glen D. Mellinger;Mitchell B. Balter;Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth

  • The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL). A measure of primary symptom dimensions

    L. R. Derogatis;R. S. Lipman;K. Rickels;E. H. Uhlenhuth

  • Scaling of Life Events

    Eugene S. Paykel;Brigitte A. Prusoff;E. H. Uhlenhuth

  • Dose-Response Study of N,N-Dimethyltryptamine in Humans: II. Subjective Effects and Preliminary Results of a New Rating Scale

    Ruck J. Strassman;Clifford R. Qualls;Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth;Robert Kellner

  • Symptom checklist syndromes in the general population. Correlations with psychotherapeutic drug use.

    E. H. Uhlenhuth;Mitchell B. Balter;Glen D. Mellinger;Ira H. Cisin

  • Drug preference and mood in humans: diazepam.

    C. E. Johanson;E. H. Uhlenhuth

  • Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam

    H. de Wit;E.H. Uhlenhuth;C.E. Johanson

  • Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine.

    C. E. Johanson;E. H. Uhlenhuth

  • New epidemiologic findings about insomnia and its treatment.

    M B Balter;E H Uhlenhuth

  • A cross-national comparison of anti-anxiety/sedative drug use.

    Balter Mb;Manheimer Di;Mellinger Gd;Uhlenhuth Eh

  • Length of treatment with anxiolytic sedatives and response to their sudden withdrawal.

    Lino Covi;R. S. Lipman;J. H. Pattison;L. R. Derogatis

  • Moclobemide in social phobia: a controlled dose-response trial.

    Russell Jr Noyes;Russell Jr Noyes;Georges Moroz;Jonathan R.T. Davidson;Michael R. Liebowitz

  • Individual Differences in Behavioral and Subjective Responses to Alcohol

    H. de Wit;E. H. Uhlenhuth;J. Pierri;C. E. Johanson

  • Psychiatric Screening in a Medical Clinic: An Evaluation of a Self-report Inventory

    Richard M. Glass;Andrew T. Allan;E. H. Uhlenhuth;Chase P. Kimball

  • Drug, doctor's verbal attitude and clinic setting in the symptomatic response to pharmacotherapy.

    E. H. Uhlenhuth;E. H. Uhlenhuth;Karl Rickels;Karl Rickels;Seymour Fisher;Seymour Fisher;Lee C. Park;Lee C. Park

  • Symptom intensity and life events.

    Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth;Eugene S. Paykel

  • The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of phenylpropanolamine, mazindol and d-amphetamine in humans.

    L. D. Chait;E. H. Uhlenhuth;Chris E. Johanson

  • Personality dimensions in panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder

    Vladan Starcevic;E.H. Uhlenhuth;Stephanie Fallon;Dorothy Pathak

  • Symptom Intensity and Life Stress in the City

    Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth;Ronald S. Lipman;Mitchell B. Balter;Martin Stern

  • World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris E. Johanson
Chris E. Johanson Wayne State University
Vladan Starcevic
Vladan Starcevic University of Sydney
Robert Kellner
Robert Kellner University of New Mexico
Teddy D. Warner
Teddy D. Warner University of New Mexico
Karl Rickels
Karl Rickels University of Pennsylvania
Eugene S. Paykel
Eugene S. Paykel University of Cambridge
Russell Noyes
Russell Noyes University of Iowa
Harriet de Wit
Harriet de Wit University of Chicago
Mark H. Pollack
Mark H. Pollack Rush University Medical Center
Donald F. Klein
Donald F. Klein New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Social Sciences and Humanities offer diverse online study options in the USA, helping students tailor their education to current job market needs. One vital pathway is pursuing msw programs, which equip graduates to support individuals and communities through social work.

For those interested in behavioral sciences, an accelerated bcba program online prepares students for the Board Certified Behavior Analyst credential, opening doors to roles in therapy and educational support.

Time-conscious learners may consider 1 year msw programs, which allow students to fast-track their social work credentials and enter the workforce more quickly. Similarly, career changers and recent graduates can explore a fast psychology degree to build expertise in mental health, research, and counseling.

Each online path offers flexibility, affordability, and quicker entry into impactful careers, making them attractive options for those passionate about supporting and understanding individuals, families, and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Eberhard H. Uhlenhuth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles