World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Doychin N. Angelov

Doychin N. Angelov

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
5344
World Ranking
7726
National Ranking
653

Doychin N. Angelov publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doychin N. Angelov sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 151 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Doychin N. Angelov D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doychin N. Angelov sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Doychin N. Angelov is affiliated with the University of Cologne in Germany and focuses research on Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on nerve injury and regeneration. Their work addresses clinical and molecular aspects related to nerve repair, rehabilitation, and neuroplasticity mechanisms.

The primary fields of study in Angelov's research include Medicine with 20 publications and Neuroscience with 9 publications. Subfields encompass Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, and Molecular Biology.

The main research topics covered by Angelov's publications are:

  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
  • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Angelov has contributed to several peer-reviewed papers, including:

  • Neutralizing BDNF and FGF2 injection into denervated skeletal muscle improve recovery after nerve repair (2020, Muscle & Nerve)
  • Facial Nerve Repair by Muscle-Vein Conduit in Rats: Functional Recovery and Muscle Reinnervation (2020, Tissue Engineering Part A)
  • Appropriate dosage, timing, and site of intramuscular injections of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promote motor recovery after facial nerve injury in rats (2024, Muscle & Nerve)
  • Trigeminal Sensory Supply Is Essential for Motor Recovery after Facial Nerve Injury (2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Manually Assisted Locomotor Therapy on Neurotrophin-3 Expression and Microglia/Macrophage Mobilization Following Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury in Rats (2023, Current Issues in Molecular Biology)

Frequent coauthors in Angelov's research network include:

  • Svenja Rink
  • Maria Eleni Μanthou
  • Levent Sarıkçıoğlu
  • Habib Bendella
  • Jannika Reuscher

Angelov's research has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Muscle & Nerve
  • Tissue Engineering Part A
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Current Issues in Molecular Biology
  • Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology

This profile reflects Angelov's involvement in investigations across several experimental models focusing on nerve regeneration and repair strategies, with attention to both muscular and neural functional recovery. The collaboration with coauthors indicates a multidisciplinary approach involving neuromuscular and molecular methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Therapeutic vaccine for acute and chronic motor neuron diseases: Implications for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    D. N. Angelov;S. Waibel;O. Guntinas-Lichius;M. Lenzen

  • Olfactory ensheathing glia and Schwann cells: two of a kind?

    Konstantin Wewetzer;Enrique Verdú;Doychin N Angelov;Xavier Navarro

  • Factors limiting motor recovery after facial nerve transection in the rat: combined structural and functional analyses

    Orlando Guntinas-Lichius;Andrey Irintchev;Michael Streppel;Mithra Lenzen

  • Focal application of neutralizing antibodies to soluble neurotrophic factors reduces collateral axonal branching after peripheral nerve lesion.

    M. Streppel;N. Azzolin;S. Dohm;O. Guntinas-Lichius

  • Nimodipine accelerates axonal sprouting after surgical repair of rat facial nerve

    DN Angelov;WF Neiss;M Streppel;J Andermahr

  • Mechanical stimulation of paralyzed vibrissal muscles following facial nerve injury in adult rat promotes full recovery of whisking

    Doychin N. Angelov;Marcin Ceynowa;Orlando Guntinas-Lichius;Michael Streppel

  • Transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells stimulates the collateral sprouting from axotomized adult rat facial motoneurons.

    Orlando Guntinas-Lichius;Doychin N. Angelov;Toma L. Tomov;Joe Dramiga

  • Transplantation of Olfactory Mucosa Minimizes Axonal Branching and Promotes the Recovery of Vibrissae Motor Performance after Facial Nerve Repair in Rats

    Unknown

  • An example of neural plasticity evoked by putative behavioral demand and early use of vibrissal hairs after facial nerve transection.

    Toma L. Tomov;Orlando Guntinas-Lichius;Maria Grosheva;Michael Streppel

  • Recovery of original nerve supply after hypoglossal-facial anastomosis causes permanent motor hyperinnervation of the whisker-pad muscles in the rat.

    Doychin N. Angelov M.D.;Andreas Gunkel;Eberhard Stennert;Wolfram F. Neiss

  • Galectin-3 is upregulated in microglial cells in response to ischemic brain lesions, but not to facial nerve axotomy

    Michael Walther;Stephan Kuklinski;Penka Pesheva;Orlando Guntinas-Lichius

  • Tenascin-R Is Antiadhesive for Activated Microglia that Induce Downregulation of the Protein after Peripheral Nerve Injury: a New Role in Neuronal Protection

    Doychin N. Angelov;Michael Walther;Michael Streppel;Orlando Guntinas-Lichius

  • The hypoglossal-facial anastomosis as model of neuronal plasticity in the rat.

    Wolfram F. Neiss;Orlando Guntinas Lichius;Doychin N. Angelov;Andreas Gunkel

  • Contralateral trigeminal nerve lesion reduces polyneuronal muscle innervation after facial nerve repair in rats.

    Doychin N. Angelov;Emmanouil Skouras;Orlando Guntinas-Lichius;Michael Streppel

  • Ablation of adhesion molecule L1 in mice favours Schwann cell proliferation and functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury

    Daria Guseva;Doychin N. Angelov;Andrey Irintchev;Andrey Irintchev;Melitta Schachner;Melitta Schachner;Melitta Schachner

  • Reversal of neuromotor and cognitive dysfunction in an enriched environment combined with multimodal early onset stimulation after traumatic brain injury in rats.

    Marc Maegele;Marcela Lippert-Gruener;Thorsten Ester-Bode;Stefan Sauerland

  • The axotomy-induced neuropeptides galanin and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide promote axonal sprouting of primary afferent and cranial motor neurones.

    Victor Suarez;Orlando Guntinas-Lichius;Michael Streppel;Shota Ingorokva

  • Slow Axonal Regrowth But Extreme Hyperinnervation of Target Muscle After Suture of the Facial Nerve in Aged Rats

    M Streppel;D.N Angelov;O Guntinas-Lichius;R.-D Hilgers

  • Increased expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, MCP-1, and MIP-1α by spinal perivascular macrophages during experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in rats

    Nils Hofmann;Nina Lachnit;Michael Streppel;Brigitte Witter

  • The pros and cons of growth factors and cytokines in peripheral axon regeneration.

    Lars Klimaschewski;Barbara Hausott;Doychin N Angelov

  • Opposite impacts of tenascin-C and tenascin-R deficiency in mice on the functional outcome of facial nerve repair.

    Orlando Guntinas-Lichius;Doychin N. Angelov;Fabio Morellini;Mithra Lenzen

  • Hypoglossal and reticular interneurons involved in oro-facial coordination in the rat.

    Anastas S. Popratiloff;Michael Streppel;Agnés Gruart;Orlando Guntinas-Lichius

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfram F. Neiss
Wolfram F. Neiss University of Cologne
Sarah A. Dunlop
Sarah A. Dunlop University of Western Australia
Agnès Gruart
Agnès Gruart Pablo de Olavide University
Melitta Schachner
Melitta Schachner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Tessa Gordon
Tessa Gordon University of Alberta
Paul V. Lehmann
Paul V. Lehmann Case Western Reserve University
José M. Delgado-García
José M. Delgado-García Pablo de Olavide University
Robert Nitsch
Robert Nitsch University of Münster
Wolfgang H. R. Miltner
Wolfgang H. R. Miltner Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Mary P. Galea
Mary P. Galea University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing neuroscience opens the door to a variety of careers beyond research and academia. Many students explore related fields online to expand their skill sets and career prospects. For those interested in social work, an accelerated msw program online offers a fast and flexible pathway to combine neuroscience knowledge with clinical social work practice.

If you are considering psychology, a fast track psychology degree online is a practical option for understanding human behavior and mental processes—skills closely tied to neuroscience.

Counseling is another rewarding pathway that connects with neuroscience backgrounds. Look for the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited) to ensure quality and affordability as you prepare for licensure.

Those aiming for roles in therapy or support services can benefit from enrolling in online mental health degree programs. These degrees can complement your neuroscience studies and open up diverse career pathways in healthcare, education, or community resources.

Best Scientists Citing Doychin N. Angelov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles