World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 76 1824 1734 22 22 218 22005

David Comas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Comas between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Comas published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2008. 8 of the 241 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2008. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 6 publications
1992 2025

241 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Comas: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 3
1996 5
1997 6
1998 4
1999 3
2000 5
2001 5
2002 3
2003 7
2004 6
2005 4
2006 4
2007 7
2008 20
2009 6
2010 9
2011 14
2012 17
2013 15
2014 5
2015 14
2016 11
2017 11
2018 5
2019 11
2020 8
2021 9
2022 6
2023 8
2024 2
2025 6
Total 241
Download as CSV

David Comas publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Comas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 215–224 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 218 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134 218
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

David Comas D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Comas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127 76
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David Comas is affiliated with Pompeu Fabra University in Spain and works primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research output includes 65 publications mainly focused on genetics and molecular biology, along with contributions to general health professions, archeology, and nutrition and dietetics.

Their work addresses several main topics, including forensic and genetic research, genetic diversity and population structure, Romani and Gypsy studies, genetic associations and epidemiology, genomics and phylogenetic studies, race, genetics, and society, as well as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology studies.

David Comas has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, notable among them are Francesc Calafell, Neus Font-Porterias, Julen Aizpurua-Iraola, Marcos Araújo Castro e Silva, and Jaume Bertranpetit.

Publications by David Comas have appeared repeatedly in several scientific journals. The most frequent publication venues include Scientific Reports, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Human Genetics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Human Molecular Genetics.

Their recent papers include:

  • Genomic insight into the origins and dispersal of the Brazilian coastal natives, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Genetic origins, singularity, and heterogeneity of Basques, 2021, Current Biology
  • Population Histories and Genomic Diversity of South American Natives, 2021, Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Deep genetic affinity between coastal Pacific and Amazonian natives evidenced by Australasian ancestry, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Population history of North Africa based on modern and ancient genomes, 2020, Human Molecular Genetics

Best Publications

  • Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans

    Iosif Lazaridis;Iosif Lazaridis;Nick Patterson;Alissa Mittnik;Gabriel Renaud

  • The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 genomes from 142 diverse populations

    Swapan Mallick;Swapan Mallick;Swapan Mallick;Heng Li;Mark Lipson;Iain Mathieson

  • Great ape genetic diversity and population history

    Javier Prado-Martinez;Peter H. Sudmant;Jeffrey M. Kidd;Jeffrey M. Kidd;Heng Li

  • Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East

    Iosif Lazaridis;Dani Nadel;Gary Rollefson;Deborah C. Merrett

  • Correlation between genetic and geographic structure in Europe.

    Oscar Lao;Timothy T. Lu;Michael Nothnagel;Olaf Junge

  • The dawn of human matrilineal diversity.

    Doron M. Behar;Richard Villems;Himla Soodyall;Jason Blue-Smith

  • The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people

    Doron M. Behar;Bayazit Yunusbayev;Bayazit Yunusbayev;Mait Metspalu;Ene Metspalu

  • Hunter-gatherer genomic diversity suggests a southern African origin for modern humans

    Brenna M. Henn;Christopher R. Gignoux;Matthew Jobin;Julie M. Granka

  • Trading genes along the silk road: mtDNA sequences and the origin of central Asian populations.

    David Comas;Francesc Calafell;Francesc Calafell;Eva Mateu;Anna Pérez-Lezaun;Anna Pérez-Lezaun

  • Independent Introduction of Two Lactase-Persistence Alleles into Human Populations Reflects Different History of Adaptation to Milk Culture

    Nabil Sabri Enattah;Nabil Sabri Enattah;Tine G.K. Jensen;Mette Nielsen;Rikke Lewinski

  • Global diversity, population stratification, and selection of human copy-number variation

    Peter H. Sudmant;Swapan Mallick;Swapan Mallick;Bradley J. Nelson;Fereydoun Hormozdiari

  • Genomic Ancestry of North Africans Supports Back-to-Africa Migrations

    Brenna M. Henn;Laura R Botigué;Simon-Pierre Gravel;Wei-wei Wang

  • A global perspective on genetic variation at the ADH genes reveals unusual patterns of linkage disequilibrium and diversity.

    Michael V. Osier;Andrew J. Pakstis;Himla Soodyall;David Comas

  • High-Resolution Analysis of Human Y-Chromosome Variation Shows a Sharp Discontinuity and Limited Gene Flow between Northwestern Africa and the Iberian Peninsula

    Elena Bosch;Francesc Calafell;David Comas;Peter J. Oefner

  • Neolithic mitochondrial haplogroup H genomes and the genetic origins of Europeans

    Paul Brotherton;Paul Brotherton;Wolfgang Haak;Jennifer Templeton;Guido Brandt

  • Human mitochondrial DNA variation and the origin of Basques.

    J. Bertranpetit;J. Sala;F. Calafell;P. A. Underhill

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Geographic population structure analysis of worldwide human populations infers their biogeographical origins

    Eran Elhaik;Tatiana Tatarinova;Dmitri Chebotarev;Ignazio S. Piras

  • Maternal Traces of Deep Common Ancestry and Asymmetric Gene Flow Between Pygmy Hunter-Gatherers and Bantu-speaking Farmers

    Lluís Quintana-Murci;Hélène Quach;Christine Harmant;Francesca Luca

  • Admixture, migrations, and dispersals in Central Asia: evidence from maternal DNA lineages.

    David Comas;Stéphanie Plaza;R Spencer Wells;Nadira Yuldaseva;Nadira Yuldaseva

  • Genome-Wide and Paternal Diversity Reveal a Recent Origin of Human Populations in North Africa

    Karima Fadhlaoui-Zid;Marc Haber;Marc Haber;Begoña Martínez-Cruz;Pierre A Zalloua

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaume Bertranpetit
Jaume Bertranpetit Pompeu Fabra University
Francesc Calafell
Francesc Calafell Pompeu Fabra University
Lluis Quintana-Murci
Lluis Quintana-Murci Institut Pasteur
David Reich
David Reich Harvard Medical School
Chris Tyler-Smith
Chris Tyler-Smith Wellcome Sanger Institute
Antti Sajantila
Antti Sajantila University of Helsinki
Mihai G. Netea
Mihai G. Netea Radboud University
Swapan Mallick
Swapan Mallick Harvard Medical School
Richard Villems
Richard Villems University of Tartu
Tomas Marques-Bonet
Tomas Marques-Bonet Pompeu Fabra University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA opens a multitude of career options in the healthcare field. Many students interested in genetics also explore complementary pathways that offer flexible online degrees and certifications, helping them boost their resumes and enhance career prospects.

For those who prefer working in medical data or administration, obtaining a medical coding and billing certification can be a quick way to enter the healthcare industry. This role offers vital support for healthcare providers and can be pursued remotely.

If you’re eager to start patient care, exploring easy nursing schools to get into might be a practical step. These programs often have less competitive entry requirements and can lead to rewarding clinical careers.

Interested in leadership roles? Accredited healthcare administration degree programs empower graduates with skills in management, preparing them for hospital or clinic administration. Budget-conscious students can also research the cheapest online healthcare management degree options, ensuring a solid education without high debt.

These related online pathways make it easy to build a diverse skill set that complements a Genetics background and increases your employability across the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing David Comas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles