World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Chantal Bard

Chantal Bard

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
6741
World Ranking
8820
National Ranking
593

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
7098
World Ranking
8051
National Ranking
474

Chantal Bard publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chantal Bard sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 83 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Chantal Bard D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chantal Bard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chantal Bard is affiliated with Université Laval in Canada. Their academic profile indicates active engagement in research within this institution.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields, subfields, or main topics of work listed for Chantal Bard. Similarly, there are no awards recorded for this researcher.

Best Publications

  • Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium

    Y. Lajoie;N. Teasdale;C. Bard;M. Fleury

  • On the cognitive penetrability of posture control.

    N. Teasdale;C. Bard;J. LaRue;M. Fleury

  • Upright Standing and Gait: Are There Changes in Attentional Requirements Related to Normal Aging?

    Y. Lajoie;N. Teasdale;C. Bard;M. Fleury

  • Postural Stability in Diabetic Polyneuropathy

    Pierre Boucher;Normand Teasdale;Richard Courtemanche;Chantal Bard

  • Availability of visual and proprioceptive afferent messages and postural control in elderly adults.

    Laurette Hay;Chantal Bard;Michelle Fleury;Normand Teasdale

  • Reference systems for coding spatial information in normal subjects and a deafferented patient

    J. Blouin;C. Bard;N. Teasdale;J. Paillard

  • Gait problems in diabetic neuropathic patients

    Richard Courtemanche;Normand Teasdale;Pierre Boucher;Michelle Fleury

  • Determining Movement Onsets from Temporal Series

    Normand Teasdale;Chantal Bard;Michelle Fleury;Douglas E. Young

  • Role of afferent information in the timing of motor commands: a comparative study with a deafferented patient.

    Chantal Bard;Jacques Paillard;Yves Lajoie;Michelle Fleury

  • Deafferentation and pointing with visual double-step perturbations.

    Chantal Bard;Yvonne Turrell;Michelle Fleury;Normand Teasdale

  • Timing and accuracy of visually directed movements in children: control of direction and amplitude components.

    Chantal Bard;Laurette Hay;Michelle Fleury

  • The role of proprioceptive information for the production of isometric forces and for handwriting tasks.

    N. Teasdale;R. Forget;C. Bard;J. Paillard

  • Gait of a deafferented subject without large myelinated sensory fibers below the neck.

    Y. Lajoie;N. Teasdale;J. D. Cole;M. Burnett

  • Aging and Postural Control: Postural Perturbations Caused by Changing the Visual Anchor

    Martin Simoneau;Normand Teasdale;Christophe Bourdin;Chantal Bard

  • Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space.

    Chantal Bard;Michelle Fleury;Normand Teasdale;Jacques Paillard

  • Updating of an internal model without proprioception: a deafferentation study.

    Pierre-Michel Bernier;Romeo Chua;Chantal Bard;Ian M. Franks

  • Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects Visuoproprioceptive conflict

    Y. Lajoie;J. Paillard;N. Teasdale;C. Bard

  • Role of peripheral vision in the directional control of rapid aiming movements

    Chantal Bard;Laurette Hay;Michelle Fleury

  • Analysis of Gymnastics Judges' Visual Search

    Chantal Bard;Michelle Fleury;Lise Carrière;Madeleine Hallé

  • Stabilization of head and eyes on target as a factor in successful basketball shooting

    H. Ripoll;C. Bard;J. Paillard

  • Contribution of Central and Peripheral Vision to the Regulation of Stance: Developmental Aspects.

    Vincent Nougier;Chantal Bard;Michelle Fleury;Normand Teasdale

  • Head orienting contributes to the directional accuracy of aiming at distant targets

    R. Roll;C. Bard;J. Paillard

Frequent Co-Authors

Michelle Fleury
Michelle Fleury Université Laval
Y. Lamarre
Y. Lamarre University of Montreal
Vincent Nougier
Vincent Nougier Joseph Fourier University
Jean Blouin
Jean Blouin Aix-Marseille University
Michel Audiffren
Michel Audiffren University of Poitiers
Bruce Bridgeman
Bruce Bridgeman University of California, Santa Cruz
George E. Stelmach
George E. Stelmach Arizona State University
Annette Majnemer
Annette Majnemer McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of neuroscience often intersects with other disciplines, creating diverse opportunities for further study and career development. Many students interested in neuroscience also explore related online programs that focus on mental health, psychology, and social work.

If you're passionate about supporting individuals and families, consider exploring the best online mft programs. These programs can help you build expertise in therapy and counseling, especially in family and relational dynamics.

For those interested in the broader field of psychology, there are several online masters in psychology as well as psychology degrees available through distance learning. These courses offer flexibility while equipping you with essential knowledge for various psychology-focused roles.

Another valuable pathway is pursuing an online master's in social work. This degree is ideal for those aiming to make a tangible impact in communities, working in schools, healthcare, or clinical settings.

Exploring these online degrees can broaden your expertise, prepare you for interdisciplinary roles, and open new career pathways in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Chantal Bard

Recently Published Articles