World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Candan Gokceoglu

Candan Gokceoglu

Award Badge
Earth Science
Turkey
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 69 1043 921 1 1 220 18417

Candan Gokceoglu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Candan Gokceoglu between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Candan Gokceoglu published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2024. 33 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2024. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 10 publications
1995 2025

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Candan Gokceoglu: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 3
1999 0
2000 3
2001 3
2002 3
2003 7
2004 15
2005 7
2006 11
2007 2
2008 11
2009 8
2010 12
2011 7
2012 16
2013 11
2014 12
2015 7
2016 8
2017 3
2018 13
2019 10
2020 15
2021 19
2022 11
2023 18
2024 23
2025 10
Total 271
Download as CSV

Candan Gokceoglu publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Candan Gokceoglu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 218–227 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 220 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290 220
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Candan Gokceoglu D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Candan Gokceoglu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78 69
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Earth Science in Turkey Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Earth Science in Turkey Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Earth Science in Turkey Leader Award

Overview

Candan Gokceoglu is affiliated with Cappadocia University in Turkey. Their research spans primarily the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science, with significant focus in Civil and Structural Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Mechanics of Materials, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work concentrates on topics including landslides and related hazards, geotechnical engineering and analysis, geotechnical engineering and underground structures, tunneling and rock mechanics, rock mechanics and modeling, flood risk assessment and management, and fire effects on ecosystems.

Notable recent publications by Candan Gokceoglu include:

  • A Comprehensive Assessment of XGBoost Algorithm for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Upper Basin of Ataturk Dam, Turkey, 2021, Applied Sciences
  • Efficient computational techniques for predicting the California bearing ratio of soil in soaked conditions, 2021, Engineering Geology
  • Flood damage assessment with Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data after Sardoba dam break with GLCM features and Random Forest method, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Use of Mamdani Fuzzy Algorithm for Multi-Hazard Susceptibility Assessment in a Developing Urban Settlement (Mamak, Ankara, Turkey), 2020, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • Evaluation of Floods and Landslides Triggered by a Meteorological Catastrophe (Ordu, Turkey, August 2018) Using Optical and Radar Data, 2020, Geofluids

Frequent collaborators in research include Sultan Kocaman, Ebu Bekir Aygar, Gizem Karakaş, Servet Karahan, and R. Can. These collaborations reflect consistent partnerships over a range of projects and publications.

The most common venues where Candan Gokceoglu publishes are:

  • The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • Engineering Geology
  • Environmental Earth Sciences
  • ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • Applied Sciences

The body of work demonstrates a focus on applied methods and computational approaches in geotechnical and environmental challenges, especially related to hazard susceptibility, landslide prediction, flood damage assessment, and the use of remote sensing and machine learning technologies.

Best Publications

  • Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran

    Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Biswajeet Pradhan;Candan Gokceoglu

  • An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps

    H.A. Nefeslioglu;C. Gokceoglu;H. Sonmez

  • Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach

    Murat Ercanoglu;Candan Gokceoglu

  • Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of sandstones using petrography-based models

    K. Zorlu;C. Gokceoglu;F. Ocakoglu;H.A. Nefeslioglu

  • Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey)

    Murat Ercanoglu;Candan Gokceoglu

  • Estimation of rock modulus: For intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation

    H. Sonmez;C. Gokceoglu;H.A. Nefeslioglu;A. Kayabasi

  • Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing techniques

    C. Gökceoglu;H. Aksoy

  • An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm

    A. Akgun;E. A. Sezer;H. A. Nefeslioglu;C. Gokceoglu

  • A fuzzy model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity of a problematic rock

    Candan Gokceoglu;Kivanc Zorlu

  • Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran

    Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Abbas Goli Jirandeh;Biswajeet Pradhan;Chong Xu

  • Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran

    Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Biswajeet Pradhan;Candan Gokceoglu;Majid Mohammadi

  • Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Neuro-Fuzzy Approach in a Landslide-Prone Area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia)

    B Pradhan;E A Sezer;C Gokceoglu;M F Buchroithner

  • Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analyses

    Tolga Can;Hakan A. Nefeslioglu;Candan Gokceoglu;Harun Sonmez

  • Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility by Decision Trees in the Metropolitan Area of Istanbul, Turkey

    H. A. Nefeslioglu;E. Sezer;C. Gokceoglu;A. S. Bozkir

  • A fuzzy triangular chart to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of the Ankara agglomerates from their petrographic composition

    Candan Gokceoglu

  • The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity

    Candan Gokceoglu;Harun Sonmez;Hakan A. Nefeslioglu;Tamer Y. Duman

  • Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia

    Ebru Akcapinar Sezer;Biswajeet Pradhan;Candan Gokceoglu

  • Application of two non-linear prediction tools to the estimation of tunnel boring machine performance

    S. Yagiz;C. Gokceoglu;E. Sezer;S. Iplikci

  • Factors affecting the durability of selected weak and clay-bearing rocks from Turkey, with particular emphasis on the influence of the number of drying and wetting cycles

    Candan Gökceoğlu;Resat Ulusay;Harun Sönmez

  • Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey

    T. Y. Duman;T. Can;C. Gokceoglu;H. A. Nefeslioglu

  • An attenuation relationship based on Turkish strong motion data and iso-acceleration map of Turkey

    Resat Ulusay;Ergün Tuncay;Harun Sonmez;Candan Gokceoglu

Frequent Co-Authors

H. A. Nefeslioglu
H. A. Nefeslioglu Eskisehir Technical University
Resat Ulusay
Resat Ulusay Hacettepe University
Biswajeet Pradhan
Biswajeet Pradhan University of Technology Sydney
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi Shiraz University
Luca Salvati
Luca Salvati Sapienza University of Rome
Albert Solé-Benet
Albert Solé-Benet Spanish National Research Council
Coen J. Ritsema
Coen J. Ritsema Wageningen University & Research
Celeste Coelho
Celeste Coelho University of Aveiro
António Ferreira
António Ferreira Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra
Dino Torri
Dino Torri Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science as a field is just the beginning. Many students find that supplementing their knowledge with skills from related disciplines can enhance career prospects. For example, pursuing an online photography degree can be valuable for environmental scientists interested in documenting fieldwork or creating compelling visual content for research and conservation efforts.

Additionally, veterans looking to transition into Earth Science or related fields have numerous options to consider. Both veteran friendly online photography degree programs and online spanish degrees for veterans provide flexible, supportive environments tailored to their unique needs and can open doors to careers in environmental education, communication, or international fieldwork.

For those interested in quick credentialing, short spanish degrees online offer an efficient pathway to gain language skills critical for collaborating with diverse communities and conducting research globally. Combining Earth Science studies with such complementary disciplines can significantly broaden career opportunities in academia, government, and industry.

Best Scientists Citing Candan Gokceoglu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles