World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
45
Citations
10023
World Ranking
1447
National Ranking
639

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
11264
World Ranking
6111
National Ranking
2749

Bruce Hajek publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Hajek sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 147 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Bruce Hajek D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Hajek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - IEEE Koji Kobayashi Computers and Communications Award "For the application of stochastic and probabilistic theory to improved understanding of computernetwork behavior, particularly, the modeling and performance optimization of multipleaccess channels."
  • 1999 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to stochastic systems, communication networks, and control.
  • 1992 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1989 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to stochastic systems, communications networks, and control systems.

Overview

Bruce Hajek is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their primary field of study is Computer Science, with research encompassing various subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Molecular Biology, Information Systems, Statistics and Probability, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their research covers several main topics, including:

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance
  • Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

Frequent collaborators in their work include Xiaohan Kang, Suryanarayana Sankagiri, Taha Ameen, Y. Hanzawa, and Shreyas Gandlur.

Bruce Hajek has contributed to several publication venues, with the most frequent being arXiv (Cornell University), followed by PLoS ONE, Stochastic Systems, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

Recent publications include:

  • From graph topology to ODE models for gene regulatory networks, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • The Longest-Chain Protocol Under Random Delays, 2023, Stochastic Systems
  • The Longest-Chain Protocol Under Random Delays, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Regenerative Particle Thompson Sampling, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • From graph topology to ODE models for gene regulatory networks, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their work bridges theoretical and applied areas, often intersecting computer science with biology, especially through the analysis of gene regulatory networks and bioinformatics.

Bruce Hajek has received several awards recognizing their contributions, including:

  • IEEE Koji Kobayashi Computers and Communications Award, 2003, for application of stochastic and probabilistic theory to improved understanding of computer network behavior, particularly the modeling and performance optimization of multiple access channels
  • Member of the National Academy of Engineering, 1999, for contributions to stochastic systems, communication networks, and control
  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, 1992
  • IEEE Fellow, 1989, for contributions to stochastic systems, communications networks, and control systems

Best Publications

  • Cooling Schedules for Optimal Annealing

    Bruce Hajek

  • Stochastic Processes in Engineering Systems

    E. Wong;B. Hajek;H. Saunders

  • Link scheduling in polynomial time

    B. Hajek;G. Sasaki

  • Information theory and communication networks: an unconsummated union

    A. Ephremides;B. Hajek

  • Hitting-time and occupation-time bounds implied by drift analysis with applications

    Bruce Hajek

  • Optimal control of two interacting service stations

    B. Hajek

  • Decentralized dynamic control of a multiaccess broadcast channel

    B. Hajek;T. van Loon

  • Gossiping with Multiple Messages

    S. Sanghavi;B. Hajek;L. Massoulie

  • Extremal Splittings of Point Processes

    Bruce E. Hajek

  • Achieving Exact Cluster Recovery Threshold via Semidefinite Programming

    Bruce Hajek;Yihong Wu;Jiaming Xu

  • VCG-Kelly Mechanisms for Allocation of Divisible Goods: Adapting VCG Mechanisms to One-Dimensional Signals

    Sichao Yang;B. Hajek

  • A tutorial survey of theory and applications of simulated annealing

    Bruce Hajek

  • The time complexity of maximum matching by simulated annealing

    Galen H. Sasaki;Bruce Hajek

  • Random Processes for Engineers

    Bruce Hajek

  • An information-theoretic and game-theoretic study of timing channels

    J. Giles;B. Hajek

  • Scheduling nonuniform traffic in a packet-switching system with small propagation delay

    Timothy Weller;Bruce Hajek

  • On the capture probability for a large number of stations

    B. Hajek;A. Krishna;R.O. LaMaire

  • Deflection routing in hypercube networks

    A.G. Greenberg;B. Hajek

  • Achieving Exact Cluster Recovery Threshold via Semidefinite Programming: Extensions

    Bruce Hajek;Yihong Wu;Jiaming Xu

  • OPTIMAL DYNAMIC ROUTING IN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS WITH CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC

    Bruce E. Hajek;Richard G. Ogier

  • 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory

    J. A. O'Sullivan;J. B. Anderson;A. Barg;A. Ashikhmin

Frequent Co-Authors

Yihong Wu
Yihong Wu Yale University
Eugene Wong
Eugene Wong University of California, Berkeley
Sujay Sanghavi
Sujay Sanghavi The University of Texas at Austin
R. Srikant
R. Srikant University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Laurent Massoulié
Laurent Massoulié French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Amos Lapidoth
Amos Lapidoth ETH Zurich
Sewoong Oh
Sewoong Oh University of Washington
Ralf Koetter
Ralf Koetter Technical University of Munich
Lei Ying
Lei Ying University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anthony Ephremides
Anthony Ephremides University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mathematics, pursuing degrees in business or finance can open up diverse career opportunities. Many opt for flexible, accessible programs that balance quality and affordability. For those exploring management roles, the easiest mba program to get into offers a practical entry point for gaining essential business skills without overwhelming admission requirements.

Similarly, the easiest online mba programs to get into provide flexible schedules ideal for working professionals looking to advance their careers while studying remotely. These programs combine convenience with important business acumen, making them attractive for math graduates transitioning into corporate roles.

For those aiming at high-level leadership and doctoral education, affordable options like the dba online programs can be a strategic choice. These programs offer the chance to specialize in business administration while maintaining cost efficiency.

Additionally, combining a strong mathematical background with finance expertise through the cheapest online masters in finance can lead to lucrative roles in investment analysis, risk management, and financial planning. These affordable degrees make finance accessible without sacrificing quality or flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce Hajek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles