World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
8056
World Ranking
18426
National Ranking
7522

Boyd Hardesty publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boyd Hardesty sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Boyd Hardesty D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boyd Hardesty sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Boyd Hardesty was affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their academic career was marked by participation in scientific research, and they contributed to the field in ways recognized by peers.

In 1997, they were honored as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). This distinction reflected their professional standing within the broader scientific community.

There is no available record of their recent papers, frequent co-authors, main fields or subfields of study, publication venues, book publications, or specific research topics from the provided data.

Best Publications

  • Structure, function, and genetics of ribosomes

    Boyd Hardesty;Gisela Kramer

  • The Mechanism by which Cycloheximide and Related Glutarimide Antibiotics Inhibit Peptide Synthesis on Reticulocyte Ribosomes

    Tom G. Obrig;William J. Culp;Wallace L. McKeehan;Boyd Hardesty

  • The mechanism of sodium fluoride and cycloheximide inhibition of hemoglobin biosynthesis in the cell-free reticulocyte system.

    Syr-Yaung Lin;Raymond D. Mosteller;Boyd Hardesty

  • Specificity of the protein kinase activity associated with the hemin-controlled repressor of rabbit reticulocyte.

    G Kramer;J M Cimadevilla;B Hardesty

  • The mechanism of cycloheximide inhibition of protein synthesis in rabbit reticulocytes.

    Wallace McKeehan;Boyd Hardesty

  • Purification and partial characterization of the aminoacyl transfer ribonucleic acid binding enzyme from rabbit reticulocytes.

    Wallace L. McKeehan;Boyd Hardesty

  • The 90-kilodalton peptide of the heme-regulated eIF-2 alpha kinase has sequence similarity with the 90-kilodalton heat shock protein.

    David W. Rose;Richard E. H. Wettenhall;Wieslaw Kudlicki;Gisela Kramer

  • In vitro protein engineering using synthetic tRNA(Ala) with different anticodons.

    Chunhua Ma;Wieslaw Kudlicki;O. W. Odom;Gisela Kramer

  • Folding of a nascent peptide on the ribosome.

    Boyd Hardesty;Gisela Kramer

  • Movement of tRNA but not the nascent peptide during peptide bond formation on ribosomes.

    O. W. Odom;William D. Picking;Boyd Hardesty

  • Ribosomes and ribosomal RNA as chaperones for folding of proteins

    Wieslaw Kudlicki;Ashley Coffman;Gisela Kramer;Boyd Hardesty

  • The effect of an antiviral peptide on the ribosomal reactions of the peptide elongation enzymes, EF-I and EF-II

    Tom G. Obrig;James D. Irvin;Boyd Hardesty

  • Possible involvement of the 90-kDa heat shock protein in the regulation of protein synthesis.

    D W Rose;W J Welch;G Kramer;B Hardesty

  • Inhibition of poliovirus replication by a plant antiviral peptide.

    Michael A Ussery;James D Irvin;Boyd Hardesty

  • Polyamines are necessary for maximum in vitro synthesis of globin peptides and play a role in chain initiation.

    David Konecki;Gisela Kramer;Pairoh Pinphanichakarn;Boyd Hardesty

  • Renaturation of rhodanese by translational elongation factor (EF) Tu. Protein refolding by EF-Tu flexing.

    Wieslaw Kudlicki;Ashley Coffman;Gisela Kramer;Boyd Hardesty

  • Inhibition of Peptide Initiation on Reticulocyte Ribosomes by Edeine

    Tom Obrig;James Irvin;William Culp;Boyd Hardesty

  • GTP hydrolysis during methionyl-tRNAf binding to 40 S ribosomal subunits and the site of edeine inhibition.

    O W Odon;G Kramer;A B Henderson;P Pinphanichakarn

  • Isolation and partial characterization of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex from rabbit reticulocytes.

    Kamales Som;Boyd Hardesty

  • Distances between 3' ends of ribosomal ribonucleic acids reassembled into Escherichia coli ribosomes.

    Obed W. Odom;David J. Robbins;James Lynch;Diane Dottavio-Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Wallace L. McKeehan
Wallace L. McKeehan Texas A&M Health Science Center
Paul M. Horowitz
Paul M. Horowitz The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Georg Stöffler
Georg Stöffler Innsbruck Medical University
Anna A. DePaoli-Roach
Anna A. DePaoli-Roach Indiana University
Hans G. Zachau
Hans G. Zachau Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ada Yonath
Ada Yonath Weizmann Institute of Science
Miriam Eisenstein
Miriam Eisenstein Weizmann Institute of Science
Bruce E. Kemp
Bruce E. Kemp Australian Catholic University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Boyd Hardesty

Recently Published Articles