World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernhard Seiboth

Bernhard Seiboth

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
9740
World Ranking
17962
National Ranking
164

Bernhard Seiboth publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Seiboth sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 119 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bernhard Seiboth D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Seiboth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Enzyme
  • Biochemistry

Bernhard Seiboth focuses on Trichoderma reesei, Hypocrea, Cellulase, Biochemistry and Gene. His work deals with themes such as Catabolite repression, Mutant, Aspergillus nidulans and Trichoderma, which intersect with Trichoderma reesei. His Hypocrea course of study focuses on Microbiology and genomic DNA.

His studies in Cellulase integrate themes in fields like Transformation, Biotechnology, Computational biology and Fungal protein. Bernhard Seiboth has included themes like Functional genomics, Trichoderma viride, Metabolic engineering and Mutagenesis in his Biotechnology study. Bernhard Seiboth is interested in Inducer, which is a field of Biochemistry.

His most cited work include:

  • A versatile toolkit for high throughput functional genomics with Trichoderma reesei (731 citations)
  • Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma (433 citations)
  • Metabolic engineering strategies for the improvement of cellulase production by Hypocrea jecorina (305 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Trichoderma reesei, Biochemistry, Cellulase, Hypocrea and Gene. His Trichoderma reesei research includes elements of Genetics, Gene expression, Catabolite repression, Mutant and Microbiology. While the research belongs to areas of Microbiology, Bernhard Seiboth spends his time largely on the problem of Trichoderma, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Genome and Strain.

His Cellulase study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Biomass, Biotechnology, Inducer and Metabolic engineering. His Hypocrea research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Extracellular, Leloir pathway, Galactitol and Transformation. His Transformation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Mutagenesis and Computational biology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Trichoderma reesei (65.22%)
  • Biochemistry (50.43%)
  • Cellulase (33.04%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Trichoderma reesei (65.22%)
  • Comparative genomics (13.04%)
  • Evolutionary biology (12.17%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Bernhard Seiboth spends much of his time researching Trichoderma reesei, Comparative genomics, Evolutionary biology, Aspergillus and Biodiversity. He is conducting research in Biochemistry and Cellulase as part of his Trichoderma reesei study. Bernhard Seiboth interconnects Genetics, Biotechnology, Cell biology, Catabolite repression and DNA sequencing in the investigation of issues within Cellulase.

His Biotechnology research integrates issues from Sexual reproduction and Botany. He works mostly in the field of Gene, limiting it down to topics relating to Computational biology and, in certain cases, Intron, Oligonucleotide, Exon, Complementary DNA and Coding region, as a part of the same area of interest. His Microbiology research focuses on Regulation of gene expression and how it connects with Conidiation, Asexual sporulation and Chromosomal translocation.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus (228 citations)
  • Cellulases and beyond: the first 70 years of the enzyme producer Trichoderma reesei (214 citations)
  • Regulators of plant biomass degradation in ascomycetous fungi. (93 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Enzyme
  • Gene
  • Genome

Bernhard Seiboth mainly investigates Trichoderma reesei, Cellulase, Hydrolysis, Botany and Biotechnology. His research integrates issues of Transcription, Gene expression, Gene, Biorefinery and Catabolite repression in his study of Trichoderma reesei. His research in Gene intersects with topics in Computational biology and Synthetic biology.

Biomass is closely connected to Trichoderma in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Biorefinery. The various areas that Bernhard Seiboth examines in his Cellulase study include Genetics, DNA sequencing, Microbiology and Cell biology. His Biotechnology study combines topics in areas such as Mating type, Heterothallic, Mating and Sexual reproduction.

Best Publications

  • A versatile toolkit for high throughput functional genomics with Trichoderma reesei

    André Schuster;André Schuster;Kenneth S Bruno;James R Collett;Scott E Baker

  • Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma

    Christian P Kubicek;Alfredo Herrera-Estrella;Verena Seidl-Seiboth;Diego A Martinez

  • Cellulases and beyond: the first 70 years of the enzyme producer Trichoderma reesei.

    Robert H. Bischof;Jonas Ramoni;Bernhard Seiboth

  • Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus

    Ronald P. de Vries;Robert Riley;Ad Wiebenga;Guillermo Aguilar-Osorio

  • Metabolic engineering strategies for the improvement of cellulase production by Hypocrea jecorina

    Christian P Kubicek;Marianna Mikus;André Schuster;Monika Schmoll

  • A complete survey of Trichoderma chitinases reveals three distinct subgroups of family 18 chitinases.

    Verena Seidl;Birgit Huemer;Bernhard Seiboth;Christian P. Kubicek

  • The putative protein methyltransferase LAE1 controls cellulase gene expression in Trichoderma reesei

    Bernhard Seiboth;Razieh Aghcheh Karimi;Pallavi A. Phatale;Rita Linke

  • Tracking the roots of cellulase hyperproduction by the fungus Trichoderma reesei using massively parallel DNA sequencing

    Stéphane Le Crom;Wendy Schackwitz;Len Pennacchio;Jon K. Magnuson

  • The CRE1 carbon catabolite repressor of the fungus Trichoderma reesei: a master regulator of carbon assimilation

    Thomas Portnoy;Thomas Portnoy;Antoine Margeot;Rita Linke;Lea Atanasova

  • The Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) hypercellulolytic mutant RUT C30 lacks a 85 kb (29 gene-encoding) region of the wild-type genome

    Verena Seidl;Christian Gamauf;Irina S Druzhinina;Bernhard Seiboth

  • Regulators of plant biomass degradation in ascomycetous fungi.

    Tiziano Benocci;Maria Victoria Aguilar-Pontes;Miaomiao Zhou;Bernhard Seiboth

  • Fungal arabinan and l-arabinose metabolism

    Bernhard Seiboth;Benjamin Metz

  • Gene targeting in a nonhomologous end joining deficient Hypocrea jecorina.

    Zhang Guangtao;Lukas Hartl;Andre Schuster;Stefan Polak

  • Systems analysis of lactose metabolism in Trichoderma reesei identifies a lactose permease that is essential for cellulase induction.

    Christa Ivanova;Jenny A. Bååth;Bernhard Seiboth;Christian P. Kubicek

  • Differential regulation of the cellulase transcription factors XYR1, ACE2, and ACE1 in Trichoderma reesei strains producing high and low levels of cellulase.

    Thomas Portnoy;Thomas Portnoy;Antoine Margeot;Verena Seidl-Seiboth;Stéphane Le Crom

  • The bgl1 gene of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414 encodes an extracellular, cellulose-inducible β-glucosidase involved in cellulase induction by sophorose

    Robert L. Mach;Bernhard Seiboth;Andrey Myasnikov;Ramon Gonzalez

  • Global carbon utilization profiles of wild-type, mutant, and transformant strains of Hypocrea jecorina.

    Irina S. Druzhinina;Monika Schmoll;Bernhard Seiboth;Christian P. Kubicek

  • The D-xylose reductase of Hypocrea jecorina is the major aldose reductase in pentose and D-galactose catabolism and necessary for β-galactosidase and cellulase induction by lactose

    Bernhard Seiboth;Christian Gamauf;Manuela Pail;Lukas Hartl

  • A homologous production system for Trichoderma reesei secreted proteins in a cellulase-free background.

    Fatma Uzbas;Ugur Sezerman;Lukas Hartl;Christian P. Kubicek

  • Additional file 8: of Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus

    Ronald de Vries;Robert Riley;Ad Wiebenga;Guillermo Aguilar-Osorio

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott E. Baker
Scott E. Baker Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Ronald P. de Vries
Ronald P. de Vries Utrecht University
Igor V. Grigoriev
Igor V. Grigoriev Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Bernard Henrissat
Bernard Henrissat Technical University of Denmark
Giancarlo Perrone
Giancarlo Perrone National Research Council (CNR)
Erika Lindquist
Erika Lindquist United States Department of Energy
Asaf Salamov
Asaf Salamov Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Claudio Scazzocchio
Claudio Scazzocchio Imperial College London
Alla Lapidus
Alla Lapidus Saint Petersburg State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students of Biology and Biochemistry in the USA have many flexible options to advance their education and careers. Online programs now cater to a wide range of aspirational paths—often in less time and at lower cost than traditional degrees. For those with a master’s in nursing, post masters fnp programs enable quick specialization to become a Family Nurse Practitioner.

Nutrition and public health enthusiasts can pursue a dietician degree online, helping launch a career in dietary science. Registered nurses interested in leadership or research roles often opt for rn to bsn online completion programs, which are designed for efficiency and convenience.

Meanwhile, professionals seeking administrative roles can consider 1 year mha programs online to quickly earn a master’s in healthcare management. Each of these options offers a unique way for biology and biochemistry graduates to expand their impact in health, research, or management.

Best Scientists Citing Bernhard Seiboth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles