World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
13250
World Ranking
14294
National Ranking
1012

Anna M. Wobus publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Wobus sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 128 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Anna M. Wobus D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Wobus sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts

Overview

Anna M. Wobus is affiliated with the Leibniz Association in Germany. Their research career includes recognition by notable scientific organizations, highlighting a specific focus in human genetics and molecular medicine.

The scientist received the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina - Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften award in 2001, with a citation pointing to contributions in human genetics and molecular medicine.

Additionally, they are a member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts.

Best Publications

  • Embryonic Stem Cells: Prospects for Developmental Biology and Cell Therapy

    Anna M. Wobus;Kenneth R. Boheler

  • Differentiation of Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cells Into Cardiomyocytes

    Kenneth R. Boheler;Jaroslaw Czyz;David Tweedie;Huang Tian Yang

  • Nestin expression: a property of multi-lineage progenitor cells?

    C. Wiese;A. Rolletschek;G. Kania;P. Blyszczuk

  • Pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells are able to differentiate into cardiomyocytes expressing chronotropic responses to adrenergic and cholinergic agents and Ca2+ channel blockers

    Anna M. Wobus;Gerd Wallukat;Jürgen Hescheler

  • Expression of Pax4 in embryonic stem cells promotes differentiation of nestin-positive progenitor and insulin-producing cells

    Przemyslaw Blyszczuk;Jaroslaw Czyz;Gabriela Kania;Martin Wagner

  • Retinoic Acid Accelerates Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiac Differentiation and Enhances Development of Ventricular Cardiomyocytes ☆

    Anna M. Wobus;Guan Kaomei;Jin Shan;Marie-Cecile Wellner

  • Muscle Cell Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells Reflects Myogenesis in Vivo: Developmentally Regulated Expression of Myogenic Determination Genes and Functional Expression of Ionic Currents

    J. Rohwedel;V. Maltsev;E. Bober;H.-H. Arnold

  • Differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells into the neuronal lineage in vitro gives rise to mature inhibitory and excitatory neurons

    Carsten Strübing;Gudrun Ahnert-Hilger;Jin Shan;Bertram Wiedenmann

  • Selection of ventricular-like cardiomyocytes from ES cells in vitro

    M. MÜller;B. K. Fleischmann;S. Selbert;G. J. Ji

  • Embryonic stem cell differentiation: the role of extracellular factors.

    Jaroslaw Czyz;Anna M. Wobus

  • Embryonic stem cell-derived neurogenesis. Retinoic acid induction and lineage selection of neuronal cells.

    Kaomei Guan;Hong Chang;Alexandra Rolletschek;Anna M. Wobus

  • From totipotent embryonic stem cells to spontaneously contracting smooth muscle cells: a retinoic acid and db-cAMP in vitro differentiation model.

    Marek Drab;Hermann Haller;Rostislav Bychkov;Bettina Erdmann

  • Embryonic stem cells as a model to study cardiac, skeletal muscle, and vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation.

    Anna M. Wobus;Kaomei Guan;Huang-Tian Yang;Kenneth R. Boheler

  • Differentiation of Embryonal Stem Cells into Keratinocytes: Comparison of Wild-Type and β1Integrin-Deficient Cells

    Claudia Bagutti;Anna M. Wobus;Reinhard Fässler;Fiona M. Watt

  • Differentiation and integrity of cardiac muscle cells are impaired in the absence of beta 1 integrin.

    Reinhard Fässler;Jürgen Rohwedel;Victor Maltsev;Wilhelm Bloch

  • Potential of embryonic stem cells.

    Anna M. Wobus

  • Differentiation of embryonic stem cell-derived dopaminergic neurons is enhanced by survival-promoting factors

    Alexandra Rolletschek;Hong Chang;Kaomei Guan;Jaroslaw Czyz

  • Potential of embryonic and adult stem cells in vitro.

    Jaroslaw Czyz;Cornelia Wiese;Alexandra Rolletschek;Przemyslaw Blyszczuk

  • High frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM signals) affect gene expression levels in tumor suppressor p53-deficient embryonic stem cells

    Jaroslaw Czyz;Kaomei Guan;Qinghua Zeng;Teodora Nikolova

  • Differentiation plasticity of chondrocytes derived from mouse embryonic stem cells.

    Claudia Hegert;Jan Kramer;Gunnar Hargus;Jana Müller

Frequent Co-Authors

Eckhard Wolf
Eckhard Wolf Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Kenneth R. Boheler
Kenneth R. Boheler Johns Hopkins University
Richard L. Lieber
Richard L. Lieber Northwestern University
Brian K. Hall
Brian K. Hall Dalhousie University
Bernd K. Fleischmann
Bernd K. Fleischmann University of Bonn
Jürgen Hescheler
Jürgen Hescheler University of Cologne
Maria Wartenberg
Maria Wartenberg Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Stefan Rose-John
Stefan Rose-John Kiel University
Niels Kuster
Niels Kuster ETH Zurich
Heinz Himmelbauer
Heinz Himmelbauer BOKU University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers in healthcare and related fields. For those interested in working with medical data, the job outlook for medical billing and coding is strong, with growing demand for skilled professionals who can handle health information securely and efficiently.

Many students are also searching for affordable online him programs to start or advance their careers in health information management. These degrees can often be completed remotely, making them ideal for those balancing other commitments.

Those passionate about nutrition and wellness may consider pursuing a master degree in nutrition online. This path combines biology, chemistry, and health sciences to prepare graduates for roles in clinical settings, research, or public health.

Lastly, technology-focused students can explore ultrasound tech programs online. These programs offer flexible study options and can quickly lead to a stable, in-demand career supporting diagnostic medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Anna M. Wobus

Recently Published Articles