World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5790
World Ranking
12985
National Ranking
5238

Angeliki Lazaridou publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angeliki Lazaridou sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 74 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Angeliki Lazaridou D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angeliki Lazaridou sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context

    Unknown

  • Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Unknown

  • Improving zero-shot learning by mitigating the hubness problem

    Georgiana Dinu;Angeliki Lazaridou;Marco Baroni

  • Multi-Agent Cooperation and the Emergence of (Natural) Language

    Angeliki Lazaridou;Alexander Peysakhovich;Marco Baroni

  • The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse context

    Denis Paperno;Germán Kruszewski;Angeliki Lazaridou;Quan Ngoc Pham

  • Social Influence as Intrinsic Motivation for Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Natasha Jaques;Angeliki Lazaridou;Edward Hughes;Çaglar Gülçehre

  • Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher

    Unknown

  • Learning and Evaluating General Linguistic Intelligence.

    Dani Yogatama;Cyprien de Masson d'Autume;Jerome T. Connor;Tomás Kociský

  • Hubness and Pollution: Delving into Cross-Space Mapping for Zero-Shot Learning

    Angeliki Lazaridou;Georgiana Dinu;Marco Baroni

  • Is this a wampimuk? Cross-modal mapping between distributional semantics and the visual world

    Angeliki Lazaridou;Elia Bruni;Marco Baroni

  • Compositional-ly Derived Representations of Morphologically Complex Words in Distributional Semantics

    Angeliki Lazaridou;Marco Marelli;Roberto Zamparelli;Marco Baroni

  • The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse context

    Denis Paperno;Germán Kruszewski;Angeliki Lazaridou;Quan Ngoc Pham

  • A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learning

    Marc Lanctot;Vinicius Zambaldi;Audrunas Gruslys;Angeliki Lazaridou

  • Multimodal word meaning induction from minimal exposure to natural text

    Angeliki Lazaridou;Marco Marelli;Marco Baroni

  • Experience Grounds Language

    Yonatan Bisk;Ari Holtzman;Jesse Thomason;Jacob Andreas

  • A Bayesian Model for Joint Unsupervised Induction of Sentiment, Aspect and Discourse Representations

    Angeliki Lazaridou;Ivan Titov;Caroline Sporleder

  • Compositional Obverter Communication Learning From Raw Visual Input

    Edward Choi;Angeliki Lazaridou;Nando de Freitas

  • Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models

    Unknown

  • Internet-augmented language models through few-shot prompting for open-domain question answering

    Unknown

  • Improving zero-shot learning by mitigating the hubness problem

    Georgiana Dinu;Angeliki Lazaridou;Marco Baroni

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Baroni
Marco Baroni Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Marc Lanctot
Marc Lanctot DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Joel Z. Leibo
Joel Z. Leibo DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Karl Tuyls
Karl Tuyls DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Thore Graepel
Thore Graepel University College London
Nando de Freitas
Nando de Freitas DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Yoram Bachrach
Yoram Bachrach DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Phil Blunsom
Phil Blunsom University of Oxford
Stephen Clark
Stephen Clark Cambridge Quantum Computing
Dani Yogatama
Dani Yogatama University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Angeliki Lazaridou

Recently Published Articles